• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

GRIZ Basketball my take

mtgrizrule

Well-known member
Sorry to not posted this under any of the other numerous threads, but just not sure where it belongs. This post will be a mixed bag, but I want to vent a few things. So here it goes, hope to have the strength not to get too personal with anyone here. If I do, I apologize in advance.

1st of all, a few of you really are overblowing this season and the losses we do have. It really disappoints me a few of you next to never post on GRIZ basketball, yet when we have tough loss, you come on here spitting fire and venom. Calling for Tinkle's and O'day's job, that is plain wrong. Then again, why does it surprise me? The same posters do it in football too. So what does that tell me? It tells me no matter what the GRIZ accomplish in revenue sport, you are never happy and always find something to bitch about. How about this? Try supporting good teams, great coaches, and great players/people. Why not appreciate we win way more than we lose in the revenue sports? Appreciate we have coaches that work very hard to run clean programs and make their players good students.

With that said, onto basketball and Tinkle. Is Tinkle perfect? Hell no, but he is improving every year. Name me a coach at Montana, or BSC basketball history that has been? Name one coach that won a national championship as a BSC member? Name one BSC program that was even considered a National Championship contender and got national respect? To my recollection, Idaho has been the only BSC program to even make the top 10 nationally. That was in the 80's, I believe. The majority of us were kids or not even born yet! The point being, in the realm of college basketball, BSC programs do not figure nationally. As much as we hate to admit it, Montana and all BSC programs are nothing more than stepping stone programs. I believe only 1 time has a program won 3 straight BSC championships in BSC history. God knows, like anyone, I would again love to see Montana or any BSC program be nationally recognized in div 1 basketball. Some of you act like we are a national power and are relevant. FYI, in the real world, we have never been a power or relevant in basketball.

Do you guys realize the coaches that go on to be successful nationally do so after leaving Montana? To be honest the ceiling has not ever been set real high at Montana by any coach for more than 1 or 2 years. The high ceiling has been set by some over presumptious and unrealistic fans, not set by the powers to be at the university. Basically Tinkle has not done worse than past coaches. Unlike past coaches though, he is actually committed to Montana. I do not know one coach that has been here the period of time Tinkle has been that bled more GRIZ blood, and represented our university with the pride, dignity, and respect he has.

Another thing many of us are overlooking is his confidence in his abilities to go after a higher caliber of player than past coaches have. Tinkle is showing he is not afraid or intimidated by bigger name coaches, programs, and conferences. He is willing to exchange blows and sell the program to highly ranked players. His attitude is, "Who is to say we cannot get the kid? What do we have to lose? Let's sell this kid." Tinkle appears to get a handful to hear him out every year, and of that handful convince 1 or 2 to be GRIZ. Selvig and Qvale were highly respected players and had some great offers from great programs. Those 2 were a package deal, and 1 happened to have been born a GRIZ, so I will not make a big deal about those 2. Last year Tinkle landed Pac 10 borderline caliber talent in Cherry and Hutchison. This year he has landed 3 Pac 10 level players in Jammar, Reader, and Autry . By the way in those 5 players we have 5 positions filled Cherry PG, Autry (SG), Jammar (SF), Reader (PF), and Hutchison (C). That is damn impressive.

Health and grades permitting, no later than 2011 this will be a dominating BSC team. it all depends on the surrounding cast Tinkle puts around them, and unfortunately these kids have to adjust to college basketball. Tbat will be Cherry's JR year and Selvig's SR year. If all these kids come aboard, are healthy, and are in the program then, and we still are still the same as we are now, then and only then will I
reconsider Tinkle's standing as coach here.

As for this year, not many of you realize what a disadvantage he is working with only 1 healthy big (Qvale). This would not be a problem if Selvig were healthier, but that is not the case. If you ask me, Tinkle has done a damn fine job working with only 1healthy big man this year. Try coaching at any level with lack of frontcourt depth. It is not easy.

I will give we have no business losing to ISU and EWU this year, but that happens in all conferences to most any team. Conference play is damn tough. However, putting this into perspective, I expected the GRIZ to be 12-4 this year, but only with a completely healthy Selvig, 10-6 as it turned out. So this team did as I expected they would. What I did not expect was for UNC and MSU have the records they did.

For those that say we do not play defense, are not coached well, and do not work hard....."BS"! Do you not realize we are ranked in the top 40 in FG% defense, Points allowed per game, and FG% (despite strugging badly a few games.) Bad teams do not rank high in those categories. Those rankings take well coached, smart, disciplined teams. Do you not realize we have only one double digit loss this year? We have lost 9 games by a total of 49 points! That is an average of about 5.5 points per loss. That is a matter of 2 possessions a game our average loss is by, 2 possessions, or 1 more defensive stop and 1 more made basket. 1 of the losses was a complete homer job (UW) by officials.

Unlike the last few years, there are not any embarassing blowouts (Weber State and PSU). This team is awfully close to being a 22-6 or 23-5. The past few years we were nowhere near being that competitive. With the talent coming aboard we will be even more competitive when the young guys mature. By my calculations we are already 7 deep the next 2 years, the means we need to land 4 role or specialty guys and we have everything we need. For the record, 1 or 2 of those players have to be great rebounders and defenders.

As frustrated as I am by our losses, in hindsight and after evaluating the welfare of this program, in my opinion this program is on the verge of great things. Those great things just are not as soon as some think. The present is good, verging on great. The future is great, verging on excellent. We have the right man directing this program, and the man I feel is committed to success at Montana, not elsewhere.

For the record, Tinkle has my 100% support as long as progress is continued and this is subject to be reevaluated after the 2011 season. Now go get the BSC championship guys, some egrizzers need to be proven wrong, PLEASE!
 
Tinkle reminds me of Joe Cravens--great guy, can't coach a lick. As a friend of mine used to say when Cravens was at Idaho, "as long as he's coaching there, we got a chance." As a Bengal, we're finding the same thing with Tinks.
 
Not often u find a coach at our level who wants to be here. That. Buys him little time in my book. I also feel he is improving as a coach. When he took over we weren't playing very well on either side of the ball now were are a very good team defensively outside of a few lapses and are much more consistent offensively. The talent he has been bringin in iks very ikmpressive and much better things are to come. No doubt the cat games and a few others were frustrating but don't let it cloud the facts, we are more consistent and are winning games we would not have just 2 years ago. Now as stated above go get a big sky chipper and prove some people wrong. GO GRIZZLIES!!!
 
Not often u find a coach at our level who wants to be here. That. Buys him little time in my book. I also feel he is improving as a coach. When he took over we weren't playing very well on either side of the ball now were are a very good team defensively outside of a few lapses and are much more consistent offensively. The talent he has been bringin in iks very ikmpressive and much better things are to come. No doubt the cat games and a few others were frustrating but don't let it cloud the facts, we are more consistent and are winning games we would not have just 2 years ago. Now as stated above go get a big sky chipper and prove some people wrong. GO GRIZZLIES!!!
 
Tarheel. What level are you comparing the Big Sky to...ACC. Sounds like a pretty condescending statement to me. That's really lame reason to keep him here. Better reasons are his teams are showing gradual improvement(except against the cats) and he has multi-year contract. And he's great recruiter
 
IronMountainGriz&Cat said:
Tarheel. What level are you comparing the Big Sky to...ACC. Sounds like a pretty condescending statement to me. That's really lame reason to keep him here. Better reasons are his teams are showing gradual improvement(except against the cats) and he has multi-year contract. And he's great recruiter


I mentioned gradual improvement and recruiting. My point is that generally speaking at the BSC level that coaches are just as motivated to build their resume to move up as they are to build the program itself. It seems that tinks genuinely loves montana and wants to build our program up instead of skipping town when Better offer comes along like so many coaches in the big sky and at montana have in the past.

Now obviously if he didn't recruit well or they weren't improving then he's gotta go regardless but that is not the case.
 
i guess i'm still really confused. NO coach has ever done anything amazing in this league. NO coach stays around after they do have some success. and NO coach has an amazing record. what is it that you guys aren't happy with, and why do you feel the expectations should be higher? so who's the best coach in the league? rahe? it seems like he should be but he's only been here for a few years and has been blessed with pretty great talent. and his conference record is certainly good, but averaging 12-4 is nothing that blows anyone away. adras has been at nau for 10+ years now and is barely over .500. and tinkle actually has a way better winning percentage than him in conference play. if i'm not mistaken tinkle is right behind rahe in conference winning percentage. now, i love huse and i think he's going to really help the cats. but you guys gotta see how funny it is when some of you are calling for tinkle to get replaced by huse! tinkles conference record is 29-19 while huse is 21-27. seems real crappy but that is exactly what almost every coach in this league is at. and i'd bet money that after a few years that is what rahe is at too. if he's even still around. i really don't see where some of these expectations come from, and to be honest, i don't understand what the expectations are. but you have the 2nd best coach in terms of winning percentage, he's always gotten you in the playoffs, and he hasn't done anything worse than any other coach in the league. even the "best" coach has lost early in playoffs the last two years. it happens to every team, and there is no reason to think that things should be any different for the griz. not on the basketball court at least. you guys have a great shot at making a run. it's sad some of you can't see that...
 
Mtgrizrule,You make a fine statement in support of Tinkle, but in my opinion you miss entirely the aspirations of many young men, who serve as cannon fodder during his years of learning to coach at this level.I played for one of the finest coaches (my opinion) at the UofM, and after a coaching change played for one of greatly reduced ability..I and my teammates knew, and resented immensly the coaches learning curve we were forced to endure. All coaches must learn somewhere, but I don't believe it should be at this level...I'm not argueing your points, but just have a different view.....
 
racehorsewilly said:
Mtgrizrule,You make a fine statement in support of Tinkle, but in my opinion you miss entirely the aspirations of many young men, who serve as cannon fodder during his years of learning to coach at this level.I played for one of the finest coaches (my opinion) at the UofM, and after a coaching change played for one of greatly reduced ability..I and my teammates knew, and resented immensly the coaches learning curve we were forced to endure. All coaches must learn somewhere, but I don't believe it should be at this level...I'm not argueing your points, but just have a different view.....


Unfortunately the biggest drawback to hiring was having a coach having to learn on the fly. Regardless of sport or level anytime there is a coaching change, the existing players have a rough transition. In some transitions, it takes for every player from the prior coach to be gone from the program. As someone that knew every player on LK's team and Wayne's teams personally up to last year, I respect every player that played for LK, then Tinkle.

I have no doubts both Wayne and Larry are great people, successful, and great families. Both have there own philosophies, expectations, strengths, and weaknesses. Together they were a perfect coaching tandem, both strong willed with egos (which you need in coaching). I respect both personally, but LK leaving when he did really disappointed me, yet still respect his decision. Tinkle was hired for his GRIZ ties and potential. We are beginning to see the wait on that potential pay off, too bad there have been growing pains for Tinkle, but that was to be expected.

The one thing Tinkle has sold me on, is his love and desire for the GRIZ, and his wanting to be the man to take GRIZ basketball to the next level. Hell, who knows maybe become the mens version of Selvig. Something just seems to strike me with Tinkle that is truely genuine as for his committment to the program. Would he jump ship? Maybe in time, but not anytime soon. I have feeling this is his job as long as he wants it. I really sounds content and motivated to succeed at Montana 1st and foremost, verses building success elsewhere. I have never said that before about any mens GRIZ coach, including LK. That is why I am willing to give Tinkle more slack than maybe other coaches here.

Speaking of coaches, I hope Martin, Matthews, Hasquet, CET, Ellis, Criswell, and Strait all pursue coaching one day. I think each would make great basketball coaches and represent the game well.
 
racehorsewilly said:
Mtgrizrule,You make a fine statement in support of Tinkle, but in my opinion you miss entirely the aspirations of many young men, who serve as cannon fodder during his years of learning to coach at this level.I played for one of the finest coaches (my opinion) at the UofM, and after a coaching change played for one of greatly reduced ability..I and my teammates knew, and resented immensly the coaches learning curve we were forced to endure. All coaches must learn somewhere, but I don't believe it should be at this level...I'm not argueing your points, but just have a different view.....
So, I am not sure what exactly you are trying to say...playing musical coaches rarely develops a great team...and new coaches bring in different ideas...these kids are given scholarships at a time many kids are struggling to buy books....Tinkle is a good coach...and the longer he stays at UM, the better he and the team will be...the future looks bright. and, he is doing it with class and a style all his own....no one expects to win the NCAA, right now...but we will see UM make a solid performance, if not next year, the year after....count on it....
 
Back
Top