Mslacat
Well-known member
griz2000 said:Mslacat said:Grizbacker1 said:CatFan22 said:Why aren't you writing some to your own?
You guys are always pissed off when someone posts a newspaper article about another kitty in trouble, so now you are getting some back at ya. I guess as always, you can dish it, but you can't take it. The multitude of losses to the Griz over the years must have really taken a toll on you. :wink:
Most of what I read on Bobcatnation seems to be written with a sense of humor about it. No real slams there!
BTW: The legal drinking age needs to moved back to 19.
Have a birthday coming up do you?![]()
I was legally, able to drink here in Montana when I was 19. If we are able to prosecute a 13 year old as an adult because he should have know better. If an eighteen year old is responsible enough to go to war and die, and if an eighteen year old is responsible enough to vote in the general election they should have the responsibility (good and bad) to be treated as a full adult with every thing that comes with it. 18-20 is a very dangerous time as an adult (actually you could view it as kind of adult in training) you must accept all the responsibilities and consequence as an adult but few of the privileges.
And for those who point to DUI or traffic/alcohol related offences committed by this group of society, I would point out the number of offences committed are very close to those members of our society who 65 and older. Only in the older populations cases a good portion of those do not involve alcohol. SO......... If you are going to deny 18-20 year old the right to drink based on the likelihood of being involved in a alcohol related vehicle accident, I would say you must also take a way a persons driver license once the turn 65. (the actual number is about 63.5 years old, but we will go with 65)