• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Good, Bad, Ugly - MSU

How about you produce the still photo of him not holding if you want to prove the official was wrong.
I already did.

I don't know how to use technology. And I'm not trying to prove the official wrong. I'm trying to get AZ to prove what he said was right. He said the hold was a grab, impeding and a good call. If he wants me to believe it, and stop disagreeing with him, he needs to prove it.

Also, I was always told that holding required "illegal" grabbing the jersey or "illegal" impeding. Grabbing a defender in the box, i.e. not outside the shoulders, is generally okay.

What don't you keep your big mouth shut? And maybe you should learn the rule too. You never played the game and your posts, or some of them, show that.
 
Last edited:
Jordan Tripp said it was a hold on the TV broadcast.
Jordan Tripp has said every non-call on an obvious penalty that would benefit the Griz is a good non-call and every call on the Griz is a good call. It's what made me so upset with Marty. Marty wouldn't and Tripp doesn't criticize the officiating even when the call is an obvious boneheaded call. I believe Jordan would have agreed with the refs and said the Sac State player was inbounds if Montana was in the same situation as Idaho was last week. I'm beginning to believe their contracts says they have to say it that way.
 
Last edited:
Jordan Tripp said it was a hold on the TV broadcast.
Then Tripp doesn't know what he's talking about either. He thought that the Cats had better players at 80% of the positions too, according to various posts, and that's absolutely wrong. No. 84 didn't think it was a hold and he's a current player. Maybe you and Tripp should talk to no. 84.

And I've noticed that Tripp is getting some criticism for siding too often with the opposing team and touting what the other teams does over the Griz.
 
I don't know how to use technology. And I'm not trying to prove the official wrong. I'm trying to get AZ to prove what he said was right. He said the hold was a grab, impeding and a good call. If he wants me to believe it, and stop disagreeing with him, he needs to prove it.

Also, I was always told that holding required "illegal" grabbing the jersey or "illegal" impeding. Grabbing a defender in the box, i.e. not outside the shoulders, is generally okay.

What don't you keep your big mouth shut? And maybe you should learn the rule too. You never played the game and your posts, or some of them, show that.
And my point, why don't you prove what you are saying. It was called a hold, prove it was wrong.
 
And my point, why don't you prove what you are saying. It was called a hold, prove it was wrong.
I am asking the other guy to prove his point. I don't have to prove any point. You are a jerk. You don't understand football.

From the Tripp is Annoying thread:

"i hardly ever get bothered by an announcer, but after a while tripp even just starts talking and my eyes automatically roll. seriously, the guy never shuts up about the opposing team - it's as if he thinks it's his job to give them props, regardless of the situation."

This comment could be made about you too.
 
I am asking the other guy to prove his point. I don't have to prove any point. You are a jerk. You don't understand football.

From the Tripp is Annoying thread:

"i hardly ever get bothered by an announcer, but after a while tripp even just starts talking and my eyes automatically roll. seriously, the guy never shuts up about the opposing team - it's as if he thinks it's his job to give them props, regardless of the situation."

This comment could be made about you too.
No, he doesn't have to prove anything.
 
No it wasn't. You said I had to prove it. You are a huge goalpost mover. When you get called on something, you try to move the goal post. Mr Never Played the Game.
Yeah it was, the point was he doesn't have prove it just like you don't think you had too. No goalposts moved at all Mr Arrogant Ass.
 
Just got this out of blue from friend:

“Watching the Griz Cat replay. The hold penalty on the third quarter Davis TD total BS.”
 
Yeah it was, the point was he doesn't have prove it just like you don't think you had too. No goalposts moved at all Mr Arrogant Ass.
You are a liar too. You didn’t say no one had to prove their point. You told me to prove mine multiple times. You just can’t get over my pointing out that you don’t understand football and never played the game.
 
Good: Seeing old friends..
Holding msu’s offense to 24 points..
Weather

Bad: Holding call on a Montana TD-should have never been called.
Ah Yat missing a wide open tight end in the middle of the field on the pick 6. He had time.
Worthham is great but use him accordingly not constantly. Use the middle of the field
We have some pretty damn good tight ends.
Not able to get the defense off the field at games end.

Ugly: A pictorial of how to masterbate at the end of the game….this needs to be addressed!
Blocked field goal-good grief!

Sorry I interrupted the back and forth of the pissing contest..carry on!
 
I already did.

I don't know how to use technology. And I'm not trying to prove the official wrong. I'm trying to get AZ to prove what he said was right. He said the hold was a grab, impeding and a good call. If he wants me to believe it, and stop disagreeing with him, he needs to prove it.

Also, I was always told that holding required "illegal" grabbing the jersey or "illegal" impeding. Grabbing a defender in the box, i.e. not outside the shoulders, is generally okay.

What don't you keep your big mouth shut? And maybe you should learn the rule too. You never played the game and your posts, or some of them, show that.
Did the official call holding? That’s the only proof you need.
 
Back
Top