Gee Confirms Kemp Off The Team

[AZGrizFan]

In today's world the term "prima donna" has become a mainstream word to often describe a vain, undisciplined, egotistical, obnoxious or tempermental person who finds it difficult to work under direction or as part of a team, and although irritating, cannot be done without. < wikipedia

So go ahead and drop "names," so what. I call it like I see you. You don't care for it, tough. I don't see the present coaching staff as lying so much as just putting out vanilla; don't go straying off the subject just to avoid what's right in front of you. And I don't speak for someone else in so far as what they may say or would have said as THE LAST THING that could be said by someone else; that's just saying you don't know your ass hole from third base. Man up and develop your own opinion. Let them speak for themselves. I don't have to prove my observation and I ain't running for office so I don't need your money; along with that I'm not convinced by your paltry attempts to brow beat me into submission, either. Kemp may not have been so obnoxious as the term implies, as far as that goes, but he was too vain to even bother being a QB, even taking into consideration his pouts about only coming to Montana in order to be a QB wearing pretty thin. Pretty vain still when he lacks reflection upon his own abilites in comparison to other QBs on the roster and figuring that he didn't measure up; pretty vain there to insist on still being QB material. Lackadaisical in running any WR routes; lackadaisical in punt returns; etc., etc., etc. Pouting away just because he wasn't the BMOC; so fragile in his time away from the game due to injuries that resembled his injured ego to cover up his lack of even bothering to begin with. Oh, but he can run, which is about all he could do, I guess, since he couldn't pass worth s--t, though no one could convince him of that either, evidently; but even then fumbling the ball away to the Bobcats within the five yard line that subsequently lost the game. Undisciplined and difficult to work with under direction, tempermental,..comes pretty close in my book. More so that than its contra. At least from what I've seen and heard of the last three or four years. And I can easily do without him.

The rest of your opinion is just that...an opinion...but come ON, man. THAT bolded statement is just piling on. That ONE play didn't lose us the Bobscat game. :roll: :lol: :lol: Maybe it was CHASE'S fumble at the 2? :? :?

 

[WyomingGrizFan]

In today's world the term "prima donna" has become a mainstream word to often describe a vain, undisciplined, egotistical, obnoxious or tempermental person who finds it difficult to work under direction or as part of a team, and although irritating, cannot be done without. < wikipedia

So go ahead and drop "names," so what. I call it like I see you. You don't care for it, tough. I don't see the present coaching staff as lying so much as just putting out vanilla; don't go straying off the subject just to avoid what's right in front of you. And I don't speak for someone else in so far as what they may say or would have said as THE LAST THING that could be said by someone else; that's just saying you don't know your ass hole from third base. Man up and develop your own opinion. Let them speak for themselves. I don't have to prove my observation and I ain't running for office so I don't need your money; along with that I'm not convinced by your paltry attempts to brow beat me into submission, either. Kemp may not have been so obnoxious as the term implies, as far as that goes, but he was too vain to even bother being a QB, even taking into consideration his pouts about only coming to Montana in order to be a QB wearing pretty thin. Pretty vain still when he lacks reflection upon his own abilites in comparison to other QBs on the roster and figuring that he didn't measure up; pretty vain there to insist on still being QB material. Lackadaisical in running any WR routes; lackadaisical in punt returns; etc., etc., etc. Pouting away just because he wasn't the BMOC; so fragile in his time away from the game due to injuries that resembled his injured ego to cover up his lack of even bothering to begin with. Oh, but he can run, which is about all he could do, I guess, since he couldn't pass worth s--t, though no one could convince him of that either, evidently; but even then fumbling the ball away to the Bobcats within the five yard line that subsequently lost the game. Undisciplined and difficult to work with under direction, tempermental,..comes pretty close in my book. More so that than its contra. At least from what I've seen and heard of the last three or four years. And I can easily do without him.

The rest of your opinion is just that...an opinion...but come ON, man. THAT bolded statement is just piling on. That ONE play didn't lose us the Bobscat game. :roll: :lol: :lol: Maybe it was CHASE'S fumble at the 2? :? :?

And for what it's worth, that's all you have as well; just an opinion. Such a mature remark, taking into account your leaving yourself wide open for the same treatment.
The Griz hadn't a turnover all game until Kemp dropped the ball when it was 2nd and 7 at the MSU 10. This with about 10:39 left in the 3rd Qtr. After that it was a cascading electron from there on in. Roper gets intercepted at 6:11 at the MSU 24. Reynolds fumbles it at :42 left in the 3rd at the MSU 5. But that's but an opinion as well, I guess. It's as good as all the rest and preceeded all the other miscues; if it didn't happen, What then?

Sure, Kemp could run a little; needing as if with twenty guys blocking 11. If a defender merely sneezed on him he fell over. Do you ever recall Kemp ever breaking a tackle? People talk about him and his body building; strange that afterwards he still couldn't pitch a ball pass twenty yards. One would have thought he had developed some strength with all those so-called muscles that he acquired. Sure didn't seem that way in the subsequent.

So what's your friggin' opinion, Shylock? If you renounce the receipt of the "quid pro quo," the state authority is not lawful in substantiating your claim for recompense. You're on your own in making recoupable your debt.

 

[AZGrizFan]

In today's world the term "prima donna" has become a mainstream word to often describe a vain, undisciplined, egotistical, obnoxious or tempermental person who finds it difficult to work under direction or as part of a team, and although irritating, cannot be done without. < wikipedia

So go ahead and drop "names," so what. I call it like I see you. You don't care for it, tough. I don't see the present coaching staff as lying so much as just putting out vanilla; don't go straying off the subject just to avoid what's right in front of you. And I don't speak for someone else in so far as what they may say or would have said as THE LAST THING that could be said by someone else; that's just saying you don't know your ass hole from third base. Man up and develop your own opinion. Let them speak for themselves. I don't have to prove my observation and I ain't running for office so I don't need your money; along with that I'm not convinced by your paltry attempts to brow beat me into submission, either. Kemp may not have been so obnoxious as the term implies, as far as that goes, but he was too vain to even bother being a QB, even taking into consideration his pouts about only coming to Montana in order to be a QB wearing pretty thin. Pretty vain still when he lacks reflection upon his own abilites in comparison to other QBs on the roster and figuring that he didn't measure up; pretty vain there to insist on still being QB material. Lackadaisical in running any WR routes; lackadaisical in punt returns; etc., etc., etc. Pouting away just because he wasn't the BMOC; so fragile in his time away from the game due to injuries that resembled his injured ego to cover up his lack of even bothering to begin with. Oh, but he can run, which is about all he could do, I guess, since he couldn't pass worth s--t, though no one could convince him of that either, evidently; but even then fumbling the ball away to the Bobcats within the five yard line that subsequently lost the game. Undisciplined and difficult to work with under direction, tempermental,..comes pretty close in my book. More so that than its contra. At least from what I've seen and heard of the last three or four years. And I can easily do without him.

The rest of your opinion is just that...an opinion...but come ON, man. THAT bolded statement is just piling on. That ONE play didn't lose us the Bobscat game. :roll: :lol: :lol: Maybe it was CHASE'S fumble at the 2? :? :?

And for what it's worth, that's all you have as well; just an opinion. Such a mature remark, taking into account your leaving yourself wide open for the same treatment.
The Griz hadn't a turnover all game until Kemp dropped the ball when it was 2nd and 7 at the MSU 10. This with about 10:39 left in the 3rd Qtr. After that it was a cascading electron from there on in. Roper gets intercepted at 6:11 at the MSU 24. Reynolds fumbles it at :42 left in the 3rd at the MSU 5. But that's but an opinion as well, I guess. It's as good as all the rest and preceeded all the other miscues; if it didn't happen, What then?

Sure, Kemp could run a little; needing as if with twenty guys blocking 11. If a defender merely sneezed on him he fell over. Do you ever recall Kemp ever breaking a tackle? People talk about him and his body building; strange that afterwards he still couldn't pitch a ball pass twenty yards. One would have thought he had developed some strength with all those so-called muscles that he acquired. Sure didn't seem that way in the subsequent.

So what's your friggin' opinion, Shylock? If you renounce the receipt of the "quid pro quo," the state authority is not lawful in substantiating your claim for recompense. You're on your own in making recoupable your debt.

Jesus. Take your meds. :? :? :?

Did Kemp fumble? Yes, that's a fact. But Kemp's turnover didn't cause us to lose. Any more than Chase's turnover or Roper's turnover did. One play didn't lose us that game. NUMEROUS plays did. You're allowing your obvious hatred of all things "Kemp" to cloud your judgement. Honestly, your post makes you come off as a guy who either a) got beat up by Kemp or b) Kemp fucked your girlfriend. Or maybe you've just cut back on the meds.

Either way, you might wanna take a couple plays off.... :lol:

 

[WyomingGrizFan]

In today's world the term "prima donna" has become a mainstream word to often describe a vain, undisciplined, egotistical, obnoxious or tempermental person who finds it difficult to work under direction or as part of a team, and although irritating, cannot be done without. < wikipedia

So go ahead and drop "names," so what. I call it like I see you. You don't care for it, tough. I don't see the present coaching staff as lying so much as just putting out vanilla; don't go straying off the subject just to avoid what's right in front of you. And I don't speak for someone else in so far as what they may say or would have said as THE LAST THING that could be said by someone else; that's just saying you don't know your ass hole from third base. Man up and develop your own opinion. Let them speak for themselves. I don't have to prove my observation and I ain't running for office so I don't need your money; along with that I'm not convinced by your paltry attempts to brow beat me into submission, either. Kemp may not have been so obnoxious as the term implies, as far as that goes, but he was too vain to even bother being a QB, even taking into consideration his pouts about only coming to Montana in order to be a QB wearing pretty thin. Pretty vain still when he lacks reflection upon his own abilites in comparison to other QBs on the roster and figuring that he didn't measure up; pretty vain there to insist on still being QB material. Lackadaisical in running any WR routes; lackadaisical in punt returns; etc., etc., etc. Pouting away just because he wasn't the BMOC; so fragile in his time away from the game due to injuries that resembled his injured ego to cover up his lack of even bothering to begin with. Oh, but he can run, which is about all he could do, I guess, since he couldn't pass worth s--t, though no one could convince him of that either, evidently; but even then fumbling the ball away to the Bobcats within the five yard line that subsequently lost the game. Undisciplined and difficult to work with under direction, tempermental,..comes pretty close in my book. More so that than its contra. At least from what I've seen and heard of the last three or four years. And I can easily do without him.

The rest of your opinion is just that...an opinion...but come ON, man. THAT bolded statement is just piling on. That ONE play didn't lose us the Bobscat game. :roll: :lol: :lol: Maybe it was CHASE'S fumble at the 2? :? :?

And for what it's worth, that's all you have as well; just an opinion. Such a mature remark, taking into account your leaving yourself wide open for the same treatment.
The Griz hadn't a turnover all game until Kemp dropped the ball when it was 2nd and 7 at the MSU 10. This with about 10:39 left in the 3rd Qtr. After that it was a cascading electron from there on in. Roper gets intercepted at 6:11 at the MSU 24. Reynolds fumbles it at :42 left in the 3rd at the MSU 5. But that's but an opinion as well, I guess. It's as good as all the rest and preceeded all the other miscues; if it didn't happen, What then?

Sure, Kemp could run a little; needing as if with twenty guys blocking 11. If a defender merely sneezed on him he fell over. Do you ever recall Kemp ever breaking a tackle? People talk about him and his body building; strange that afterwards he still couldn't pitch a ball pass twenty yards. One would have thought he had developed some strength with all those so-called muscles that he acquired. Sure didn't seem that way in the subsequent.

So what's your friggin' opinion, Shylock? If you renounce the receipt of the "quid pro quo," the state authority is not lawful in substantiating your claim for recompense. You're on your own in making recoupable your debt.

Jesus. Take your meds. :? :? :?

Did Kemp fumble? Yes, that's a fact. But Kemp's turnover didn't cause us to lose. Any more than Chase's turnover or Roper's turnover did. One play didn't lose us that game. NUMEROUS plays did. You're allowing your obvious hatred of all things "Kemp" to cloud your judgement. Honestly, your post makes you come off as a guy who either a) got beat up by Kemp or b) Kemp f***[*] your girlfriend. Or maybe you've just cut back on the meds.

Either way, you might wanna take a couple plays off.... :lol:

So, like I said before; if you don't like it, tough. Besides, it doesn't matter just how logical your viewpoint is nor just how illogical mine is. Whatever gets rid of your University of Montana Athletic Department, at the very least; plain and simple.

 

[AZGrizFan]

The rest of your opinion is just that...an opinion...but come ON, man. THAT bolded statement is just piling on. That ONE play didn't lose us the Bobscat game. :roll: :lol: :lol: Maybe it was CHASE'S fumble at the 2? :? :?

And for what it's worth, that's all you have as well; just an opinion. Such a mature remark, taking into account your leaving yourself wide open for the same treatment.
The Griz hadn't a turnover all game until Kemp dropped the ball when it was 2nd and 7 at the MSU 10. This with about 10:39 left in the 3rd Qtr. After that it was a cascading electron from there on in. Roper gets intercepted at 6:11 at the MSU 24. Reynolds fumbles it at :42 left in the 3rd at the MSU 5. But that's but an opinion as well, I guess. It's as good as all the rest and preceeded all the other miscues; if it didn't happen, What then?

Sure, Kemp could run a little; needing as if with twenty guys blocking 11. If a defender merely sneezed on him he fell over. Do you ever recall Kemp ever breaking a tackle? People talk about him and his body building; strange that afterwards he still couldn't pitch a ball pass twenty yards. One would have thought he had developed some strength with all those so-called muscles that he acquired. Sure didn't seem that way in the subsequent.

So what's your friggin' opinion, Shylock? If you renounce the receipt of the "quid pro quo," the state authority is not lawful in substantiating your claim for recompense. You're on your own in making recoupable your debt.

Jesus. Take your meds. :? :? :?

Did Kemp fumble? Yes, that's a fact. But Kemp's turnover didn't cause us to lose. Any more than Chase's turnover or Roper's turnover did. One play didn't lose us that game. NUMEROUS plays did. You're allowing your obvious hatred of all things "Kemp" to cloud your judgement. Honestly, your post makes you come off as a guy who either a) got beat up by Kemp or b) Kemp f***[*] your girlfriend. Or maybe you've just cut back on the meds.

Either way, you might wanna take a couple plays off.... :lol:

So, like I said before; if you don't like it, tough. Besides, it doesn't matter just how logical your viewpoint is nor just how illogical mine is. Whatever gets rid of your University of Montana Athletic Department, at the very least; plain and simple.

What does that even mean? :? :? :?