• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

GAME DAY THREAD - UNDSU

gobison said:
I like to go back and read game threads to see where it’s a break down when we start kicking your ass . I should take screen shots of all the cockiness , aged well
Click to expand...

How many national titles would Montana have if NDSU would have went 1-AA in 1990. Some say zero
 
gobison said:
I like to go back and read game threads to see where it’s a break down when we start kicking your ass . I should take screen shots of all the cockiness , aged well
Click to expand...
I'd say I can't believe you don't have better things to do with your time, but I very much can believe it. :lol:
 
logicfan said:
gobison said:
I like to go back and read game threads to see where it’s a break down when we start kicking your ass . I should take screen shots of all the cockiness , aged well
Click to expand...

How many national titles would Montana have if NDSU would have went 1-AA in 1990. Some say zero
Click to expand...

Not 1990. 1978.

IMO had that happened, NDSU would be in the FBS at this point.
 
Oldschoolhornet said:
Uofmman now that your season is over you have a bunch of time to root for Sac State!
Click to expand...
Nah, I think I'll pass. Thanks for speeding over here after your first playoff win, though! We know how much our approval means to you! :thumb:
 
Oldschoolhornet said:
Uofmman now that your season is over you have a bunch of time to root for Sac State!
Click to expand...

I'll be cheering for sac...hope they run the table and have a chance to curb stomp the kittens. Tall task.
 
Colter_Nuanez56 said:
https://twitter.com/SkylineSportsMT/status/1599302258578972673
Click to expand...

ugh, what hauck said about britt 'there were several plays we liked, but we checked and he had not practiced them'. what? you've got a qb who has been repeatedly injured, and might possibly have been playing injured from the start of the game, you are going to play a defense that is fast and hits hard, and you don't get your backup a few reps on what is depicted as a handful of plays you think would work in the game? that just seems...
 
argh! said:
Colter_Nuanez56 said:
https://twitter.com/SkylineSportsMT/status/1599302258578972673
Click to expand...

ugh, what hauck said about britt 'there were several plays we liked, but we checked and he had not practiced them'. what? you've got a qb who has been repeatedly injured, and might possibly have been playing injured from the start of the game, you are going to play a defense that is fast and hits hard, and you don't get your backup a few reps on what is depicted as a handful of plays you think would work in the game? that just seems...
Click to expand...
People keep bringing this up, but do you think they should have given Britt starter practice reps (more than 50%) instead of LJ, even though it was clear LJ gave them a much better chance of winning? LJ needs those reps in order to get ready, but do we want to take those away on the chance that Britt has to come into the game? I guess what I want to know is what's the proper ratio of reps where LJ gets enough to be effective, but Britt gets enough to come in if needed without it being detrimental to LJ? It's effectively a zero-sum situation.
 
uofmman1122 said:
People keep bringing this up, but do you think they should have given Britt starter practice reps (more than 50%) instead of LJ, even though it was clear LJ gave them a much better chance of winning? LJ needs those reps in order to get ready, but do we want to take those away on the chance that Britt has to come into the game? I guess what I want to know is what's the proper ratio of reps where LJ gets enough to be effective, but Britt gets enough to come in if needed without it being detrimental to LJ? It's effectively a zero-sum situation.
Click to expand...

of course britt should not have gotten the same amount of reps as johnson, i never said anything of the sort. but given johnson's recent history, and the fact that it appeared he had an injury that from previous games looked to be one tackle away from being made significantly worse, you'd think having britt run a few extra plays that the coaches thought would work would be doable.
 
argh! said:
uofmman1122 said:
People keep bringing this up, but do you think they should have given Britt starter practice reps (more than 50%) instead of LJ, even though it was clear LJ gave them a much better chance of winning? LJ needs those reps in order to get ready, but do we want to take those away on the chance that Britt has to come into the game? I guess what I want to know is what's the proper ratio of reps where LJ gets enough to be effective, but Britt gets enough to come in if needed without it being detrimental to LJ? It's effectively a zero-sum situation.
Click to expand...

of course britt should not have gotten the same amount of reps as johnson, i never said anything of the sort. but given johnson's recent history, and the fact that it appeared he had an injury that from previous games looked to be one tackle away from being made significantly worse, you'd think having britt run a few extra plays that the coaches thought would work would be doable.
Click to expand...
I'm saying that I don't think even giving the kid 100% of the reps would've been enough to make him as effective as we needed him to be, and any less for Johnson would've just made him even more ineffective. That's not a knock on Britt, just the reality of the situation.
 
uofmman1122 said:
argh! said:
of course britt should not have gotten the same amount of reps as johnson, i never said anything of the sort. but given johnson's recent history, and the fact that it appeared he had an injury that from previous games looked to be one tackle away from being made significantly worse, you'd think having britt run a few extra plays that the coaches thought would work would be doable.
Click to expand...
I'm saying that I don't think even giving the kid 100% of the reps would've been enough to make him as effective as we needed him to be, and any less for Johnson would've just made him even more ineffective. That's not a knock on Britt, just the reality of the situation.
Click to expand...

...basically Britt did a unbelievable job being thrown in the lion's den without any
training ....more respect for him...I think he will be great one if handle right!
 
grizghost said:
uofmman1122 said:
I'm saying that I don't think even giving the kid 100% of the reps would've been enough to make him as effective as we needed him to be, and any less for Johnson would've just made him even more ineffective. That's not a knock on Britt, just the reality of the situation.
Click to expand...

...basically Britt did a unbelievable job being thrown in the lion's den without any
training ....more respect for him...I think he will be great one if handle right!
Click to expand...
Yeah, I think he did great with some freshman mistakes, and he can only get better.
 
uofmman1122 said:
argh! said:
of course britt should not have gotten the same amount of reps as johnson, i never said anything of the sort. but given johnson's recent history, and the fact that it appeared he had an injury that from previous games looked to be one tackle away from being made significantly worse, you'd think having britt run a few extra plays that the coaches thought would work would be doable.
Click to expand...
I'm saying that I don't think even giving the kid 100% of the reps would've been enough to make him as effective as we needed him to be, and any less for Johnson would've just made him even more ineffective. That's not a knock on Britt, just the reality of the situation.
Click to expand...

ok, got it, and thanks for the further explanation!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top