• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Final 4 Bound???

SwiLLSaysKobe4MVP said:
CDAGRIZ said:
SwiLLSaysKobe4MVP said:
Lou said:
Oh well, same thing.

Appy St is 1-AA and Gonzaga is 1-AAA. What the shitt are you talking about dude?

I think he meant that APPY ST. can't play against the big boys for a championship in FB. Thus, the absurdity of them being suggested as the best team in college FB.

The difference with GU (1-AAA) is that 1-AAA teams actually play with the big boys; and have a chance of being the best overall bball team in America. (not saying GU is the best; so don't even crow about that)

Appy St has just as much of a chance to win a national title in basketball as the Zags do each year....There is only div 1 in basketball. 320+ teams have the same shot at the beginning of the year. Are you high or just an idiot...

Swilly, Here's a recap since you can't read a thread before making yourself look stupid:

Lou said that someone picked GU for the FF. Then bigtyme said that it meant that if UM beat GU it would mean that UM would win the championship (again, since GU was picked for the FF).

Then Lou said that, by that logic, if Mich beat #1 OSU in FB, it would mean that Appy ST. would be #1. Obviously, this is not the case since Appy St. cannot even play for a big boys title in FB. This is why lou pointed out that Appy St. was DII (incorrectly), but what he meant was that they cannot be #1; not even close. So bigtyme's logic does not hold. (nothing against you bigtyme, I know you were porbably joking).

Therein lies Lou's point: its absurd to suggest that kind of thing because if one uses that logic for other situations, he/she gets absurd outcomes.

You then suggested that 1-AAA is somehow inferior to 1-AA.

I then tried to explain this to you by reiterating Lou's point to you (which has now been done about five times). I then said that Appy St. has no chance to win a big boy title in FB since they are 1-AA. I then said that 1-AAA teams actually can win a big boy title in BB. Hence the difference between the possible level of acievement between a 1-AA FB program and a 1-AAA BB program.

How's your head? You cheapen my degree.

PS- I KNOW that Appy has a chance to win the BB championship. That fact does not weaken wy position; if anything, it strengthens it.
 
SwiLLSaysKobe4MVP said:
CDAGRIZ said:
SwiLLSaysKobe4MVP said:
Lou said:
Oh well, same thing.

Appy St is 1-AA and Gonzaga is 1-AAA. What the shitt are you talking about dude?

I think he meant that APPY ST. can't play against the big boys for a championship in FB. Thus, the absurdity of them being suggested as the best team in college FB.

The difference with GU (1-AAA) is that 1-AAA teams actually play with the big boys; and have a chance of being the best overall bball team in America. (not saying GU is the best; so don't even crow about that)

Appy St has just as much of a chance to win a national title in basketball as the Zags do each year....There is only div 1 in basketball. 320+ teams have the same shot at the beginning of the year. Are you high or just an idiot...

I see only one thing wrong with this Swill......Appy State doesn't have as much of a chance as GU each year because of the immense talent gap! Kinda like when your fourth grade english teacher told you that the world needs ditch diggers too.
 
I see only one thing wrong with this Swill......Appy State doesn't have as much of a chance as GU each year because of the immense talent gap! Kinda like when your fourth grade english teacher told you that the world needs ditch diggers too.



I am sure Michigan was thinking the same thing. As for ditch diggers, what would that teacher know? Hell that ditch digger makes more money and if lucky works for the State gov with great benefits. :thumb: lol
 
mtgrizrule said:
I see only one thing wrong with this Swill......Appy State doesn't have as much of a chance as GU each year because of the immense talent gap! Kinda like when your fourth grade english teacher told you that the world needs ditch diggers too.



I am sure Michigan was thinking the same thing. As for ditch diggers, what would that teacher know? Hell that ditch digger makes more money and if lucky works for the State gov with great benefits. :thumb: lol

WHAT!
 
mtgrizrule said:
Lou, wake up. APPY STATE beat Michigan in football this year.

So that means they win the National Championship? OMG you people are killing me......to be continued....(I'm sure)
 
mtgrizrule said:
Lou, wake up. APPY STATE beat Michigan in football this year.

Some people think cucumbers taste better pickled.

istockphoto_1787169_nuclear_head.jpg



ArggHH!!!
 
AtHomeInTheDahlbergDen said:
Lou said:
mtgrizrule said:
Lou, wake up. APPY STATE beat Michigan in football this year.

So that means they win the National Championship? OMG you people are killing me......to be continued....(I'm sure)
and.... ignored.

This will make my life much easier......I will have to explain myself one less time per day. Thanks Denny; love your food by the way. That moons over my hammy is to die for!
 
Had to see that... Lou, i think we'd all prefer if you didn't try to explain anything. you contribute nothing insightful and only attempt to tack your unintelligent banter onto CDA's "i didn't have time to write a short letter so i wrote a long one instead" posts.
 
AtHomeInTheDahlbergDen said:
Had to see that... Lou, i think we'd all prefer if you didn't try to explain anything. you contribute nothing insightful and only attempt to tack your unintelligent banter onto CDA's "i didn't have time to write a short letter so i wrote a long one instead" posts.

I start off short; and when people aren't able to grasp, I'm forced to elaborate. I think you'd do the same....
 
CDAGRIZ said:
AtHomeInTheDahlbergDen said:
Had to see that... Lou, i think we'd all prefer if you didn't try to explain anything. you contribute nothing insightful and only attempt to tack your unintelligent banter onto CDA's "i didn't have time to write a short letter so i wrote a long one instead" posts.

I start off short; and when people aren't able to grasp, I'm forced to elaborate. I think you'd do the same....
not if it drastically diluted the point i was trying to make.
 
AtHomeInTheDahlbergDen said:
CDAGRIZ said:
AtHomeInTheDahlbergDen said:
Had to see that... Lou, i think we'd all prefer if you didn't try to explain anything. you contribute nothing insightful and only attempt to tack your unintelligent banter onto CDA's "i didn't have time to write a short letter so i wrote a long one instead" posts.

I start off short; and when people aren't able to grasp, I'm forced to elaborate. I think you'd do the same....
not if it drastically diluted the point i was trying to make.

What if it was the only way to spell things out for people like Swilly? Strengthen? Yes. Dilute? Hardly, for anyone with over about 95 IQ and basic comprehension of the English Language.

And...ignored
 
CDAGRIZ said:
AtHomeInTheDahlbergDen said:
CDAGRIZ said:
AtHomeInTheDahlbergDen said:
Had to see that... Lou, i think we'd all prefer if you didn't try to explain anything. you contribute nothing insightful and only attempt to tack your unintelligent banter onto CDA's "i didn't have time to write a short letter so i wrote a long one instead" posts.

I start off short; and when people aren't able to grasp, I'm forced to elaborate. I think you'd do the same....
not if it drastically diluted the point i was trying to make.

What if it was the only way to spell things out for people like Swilly? Strengthen? Yes. Dilute? Hardly, for anyone with over about 95 IQ and basic comprehension of the English Language.

And...ignored
No, it's diluted. Don't confuse unreadable and poorly structured with intelligent.
 
AtHomeInTheDahlbergDen said:
Had to see that... Lou, i think we'd all prefer if you didn't try to explain anything. you contribute nothing insightful and only attempt to tack your unintelligent banter onto CDA's "i didn't have time to write a short letter so i wrote a long one instead" posts.

Lou said:
At the time of their epic matchup:

Total games played in career:
TH: 34
JH:19

Total minutes played in career:
TH: 1,028
JH: 223

Really? Both of these teams give Gonzaga a RUN FOR THEIR MONEY?

Well since the year 2000 Gonzaga's record against SC is 15-2 with an average margin of victory of over 10 points. With a win streak of 13 at one point.

The Zags record against SM is 16-2 since 2000 and their average margin of victory is over 17

I don't think this sounds like a run for their money to me, but maybe we have different definitions of the term.



Here you go Denny. Just two of the many posts that actually include INSIGHT, do you even know what that means? I post based on fact and research. You post on sheer intuition, or lack thereof.
 
AtHomeInTheDahlbergDen said:
CDAGRIZ said:
AtHomeInTheDahlbergDen said:
CDAGRIZ said:
I start off short; and when people aren't able to grasp, I'm forced to elaborate. I think you'd do the same....
not if it drastically diluted the point i was trying to make.

What if it was the only way to spell things out for people like Swilly? Strengthen? Yes. Dilute? Hardly, for anyone with over about 95 IQ and basic comprehension of the English Language.

And...ignored
No, it's diluted. Don't confuse unreadable and poorly structured with intelligent.


Sorry Den, had to see that one...

If something is unreadable, it implies an inability to read that something. If that something is written in English, it implies an inability to read/comprehend English. If the person proclaiming such a piece unreadable is YOU, what are you saying about yourself?

if A -> B
if B -> C

how's that for structure?
 
Lou said:
AtHomeInTheDahlbergDen said:
Had to see that... Lou, i think we'd all prefer if you didn't try to explain anything. you contribute nothing insightful and only attempt to tack your unintelligent banter onto CDA's "i didn't have time to write a short letter so i wrote a long one instead" posts.

Lou said:
At the time of their epic matchup:

Total games played in career:
TH: 34
JH:19

Total minutes played in career:
TH: 1,028
JH: 223

Really? Both of these teams give Gonzaga a RUN FOR THEIR MONEY?

Well since the year 2000 Gonzaga's record against SC is 15-2 with an average margin of victory of over 10 points. With a win streak of 13 at one point.

The Zags record against SM is 16-2 since 2000 and their average margin of victory is over 17

I don't think this sounds like a run for their money to me, but maybe we have different definitions of the term.



Here you go Denny. Just two of the many posts that actually include INSIGHT, do you even know what that means? I post based on fact and research. You post on sheer intuition, or lack thereof.
Two. Well done. I'm glad you spent the time doing this extensive research for message board posts on topics i could give a damn about. Are you a griz fan or do you just not have anything else to do? I'm sure there's a GU message board filled with people like you.
 
AtHomeInTheDahlbergDen said:
Lou said:
AtHomeInTheDahlbergDen said:
Had to see that... Lou, i think we'd all prefer if you didn't try to explain anything. you contribute nothing insightful and only attempt to tack your unintelligent banter onto CDA's "i didn't have time to write a short letter so i wrote a long one instead" posts.

Lou said:
At the time of their epic matchup:

Total games played in career:
TH: 34
JH:19

Total minutes played in career:
TH: 1,028
JH: 223

Really? Both of these teams give Gonzaga a RUN FOR THEIR MONEY?

Well since the year 2000 Gonzaga's record against SC is 15-2 with an average margin of victory of over 10 points. With a win streak of 13 at one point.

The Zags record against SM is 16-2 since 2000 and their average margin of victory is over 17

I don't think this sounds like a run for their money to me, but maybe we have different definitions of the term.



Here you go Denny. Just two of the many posts that actually include INSIGHT, do you even know what that means? I post based on fact and research. You post on sheer intuition, or lack thereof.
Two. Well done. I'm glad you spent the time doing this extensive research for message board posts on topics i could give a damn about. Are you a griz fan or do you just not have anything else to do? I'm sure there's a GU message board filled with people like you.

Yes, two, and that was in the last three days. It's also two more than you've accomplished in the last 1658 posts. Pretty good percentage for me I think. And this one counts as well!!

Thanks for ignoring me by the way!!!
 
Back
Top