Not embarrassed at all. I still think we should play NAIA teams. Look at the state of our teams this past year. It was an embarrassment for the program, fans and the university. A solution would be to play lesser teams for experience to be more prepared for the regular season. It appears that will be the case in next year's schedule. BUT I NEVER SAID! "every year" admit you are wrong and that you just looking to challenge someone you do not like.
No, it was actually your inability to have a rational conversation around your own suggestion of playing NAIA teams that annoyed me, not the other way around. You threw out an incredibly stupid idea, and then just got mad and whined when people tried to actually discuss it with you.
Listen, yes, you should play lesser teams, but they should be lower level FCS and D2 teams. Which is what our schedule is for next year. That is very different than Montana NAIA teams. There is a huge difference between Central Washington and the Northern Lights. That was the point that many of us tried to discuss with you, and you doubled down.
By playing a Montana NAIA team, we would lose attendance, NAIA kids would get hurt needlessly, and the team wouldn't develop like you claim to be true. They would develop more bad habits than good, and things would work against NAIA teams that would never work against good FCS teams, simply because of the difference in size and speed. That is why teams are not developing their QBs that way. You don't see MSU, NDSU, or SDSU scheduling games against Rocky or Montana Western to develop young players.
Your obsessive focus on the part about you never said "every year" is a very poor attempt to deflect the discussion.
I NEVER SAID! "every year" admit you are wrong and that you just looking to challenge someone you do not like.
You are being overly pedantic. Then how would we choose what years? You have to schedule out games in advance. If a game against an NAIA team is such a good idea, why not do it every year? You are trying so desperately hard to say "you're wrong" that you have completely lost sight of the forest while you stare at one tiny little sapling. I don't know if you said "every year," I haven't looked through every post. Perhaps I was wrong on that. Your overall point is still a senseless one, though, even if you only think we should do it 75% of the time or some other metric you have invented to avoid discussing your actual idea.