• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Fall Camp Day-4 Observations

Jesse said:
AZGrizFan said:
Stitt may have dropped the ball on Andersen. Not arguing that.

But he gave us Samuel Akem and Samori Toure. Let's celebrate the successes. :) :) :)
I know you are right, but they haven’t stepped it up and beat the cats likeTroy handled us. oh what could of have been if only someone on his staff had remembered who the Fitz brothers were. I think Troy is going to have his hands full playing middle linebacker. But he is smart as hell and hopefully he doesn’t play offense against us ever again. Can’t wait for the brawl of the wild.

Ps. You were right Troy ran by Rh and the entire bsc. Luckily for us the fastest guy in the bsc is now playing middle linebacker. If I was calling their defense I would have him on the weak side and blitz him on a regular basis.

Well, I try not to focus on the ones who DON’T choose to come here…for the record, there’s been a couple ‘scat O-linemen from Montana that I’d have loved to have seen in Maroon and Silver over the past 4-5 years as well…

And with him playing MLB, I would guess running lanes/holes are going to close up about THAT much faster….
 
AZGrizFan said:
Jesse said:
I know you are right, but they haven’t stepped it up and beat the cats likeTroy handled us. oh what could of have been if only someone on his staff had remembered who the Fitz brothers were. I think Troy is going to have his hands full playing middle linebacker. But he is smart as hell and hopefully he doesn’t play offense against us ever again. Can’t wait for the brawl of the wild.

Ps. You were right Troy ran by Rh and the entire bsc. Luckily for us the fastest guy in the bsc is now playing middle linebacker. If I was calling their defense I would have him on the weak side and blitz him on a regular basis.

Well, I try not to focus on the ones who DON’T choose to come here…for the record, there’s been a couple ‘scat O-linemen from Montana that I’d have loved to have seen in Maroon and Silver over the past 4-5 years as well…

And with him playing MLB, I would guess running lanes/holes are going to close up about THAT much faster….
From what I'm gathering, moving Andersen to Mike has two benefits: 1) he's in a better spot 'call the defense' and keep the unit organized, and 2) it will be hard to scheme against him when he generally lining up at (or near) the opposing Center. There should be no predictable blitz tendencies from (or to) the strong or weak sides. He's expected to play free and find the ball, and should be in a majority of tackles. He should rack up TFLs at a blistering pace. It's the Brian Urlacher model. We shall see. Time will tell.
 
ABQCat said:
AZGrizFan said:
Well, I try not to focus on the ones who DON’T choose to come here…for the record, there’s been a couple ‘scat O-linemen from Montana that I’d have loved to have seen in Maroon and Silver over the past 4-5 years as well…

And with him playing MLB, I would guess running lanes/holes are going to close up about THAT much faster….
From what I'm gathering, moving Andersen to Mike has two benefits: 1) he's in a better spot 'call the defense' and keep the unit organized, and 2) it will be hard to scheme against him when he generally lining up at (or near) the opposing Center. There should be no predictable blitz tendencies from (or to) the strong or weak sides. He's expected to play free and find the ball, and should be in a majority of tackles. He should rack up TFLs at a blistering pace. It's the Brian Urlacher model. We shall see. Time will tell.

Well he’s definitely the guy I’d want running the D, and he’d be wasted at safety (IMHO).
 
garizzalies said:
hunt-ducks said:
Uh, just to make the rules clear, we're not talking about former banned screen names. I didn't ban myself, and have no control over the invertebrate whiners who who couldn't keep-up and whined enough to get me banned. You have accused me of posting under multiple screen names NOW. You have stated that Jess, 3-7-77, and possibly other screen names are me. So, if I do not have any other ACTIVE screen names, you and your short-peckered-friend LOSE, and need to donate the $500.

Now, watch his spin-it in 5-4-3-2-1

Making you and The Squad look stupid, is as easy as watching you look into your mirror each morning.
You lost the bet, now pay up.
Montana statutory law identifies the essential elements of a contract as follows:

  • Identifiable parties capable of contracting; ✅
  • their consent; ✅
  • a lawful object; ✅ and

  • a sufficient cause or consideration. ✅
See MCA sec. 28-2-102.
All of the elements are clearly established and you are required by law to pay. You said you would do so “quickly”.

You made an offer to name any other screen name that is yours, and I accepted and proved there are at least 8 other names. You did not and cannot dispute that.

You cannot change the terms of the contract after acceptance. As stated in your offer, the only way you can get out of it is if a mod says all of those names did not belong to you. Good luck with that. I will allow a reasonable opportunity for you to attempt this—couple days should suffice.

I will expect to meet you at Nate’s office this week. Friday works best for me. And I demand that you bring cash. I know you have never seen $500 cash in you life, so you better scrape together everything you own and head down to Mountain Man Pawn, because I don’t want you giving Nate a bad check—and I can totally see you trying that.

Nice try dip stick. You and your butt-buddies posted that 3-7-77 and Jesse were me. I have NEVER utilized more than one screen name at a time. You lost the bet, but predictably will welch on it. You are such a loser, and a non-athlete pedestrian fan.
 
hunt-ducks said:
garizzalies said:
You lost the bet, now pay up.
Montana statutory law identifies the essential elements of a contract as follows:

  • Identifiable parties capable of contracting; ✅
  • their consent; ✅
  • a lawful object; ✅ and

  • a sufficient cause or consideration. ✅
See MCA sec. 28-2-102.
All of the elements are clearly established and you are required by law to pay. You said you would do so “quickly”.

You made an offer to name any other screen name that is yours, and I accepted and proved there are at least 8 other names. You did not and cannot dispute that.

You cannot change the terms of the contract after acceptance. As stated in your offer, the only way you can get out of it is if a mod says all of those names did not belong to you. Good luck with that. I will allow a reasonable opportunity for you to attempt this—couple days should suffice.

I will expect to meet you at Nate’s office this week. Friday works best for me. And I demand that you bring cash. I know you have never seen $500 cash in you life, so you better scrape together everything you own and head down to Mountain Man Pawn, because I don’t want you giving Nate a bad check—and I can totally see you trying that.

Nice try dip stick. You and your butt-buddies posted that 3-7-77 and Jesse were me. I have NEVER utilized more than one screen name at a time. You lost the bet, but predictably will welch on it. You are such a loser, and a non-athlete pedestrian fan.
You fucking liar. You muther fucking liar!

Anyone can go back and look at the posts. I never said shit other than “accept!” Never mentioned 77/Jessie. Quit making shit up.

You were running your fat mouth and got called on it and you ran out the back door as usual.

You made the offer. Not me. Nobody forced you to bet. And you never said shit about “at a time” prior to my acceptance. Trying to weasel out now just shows your character, or lack thereof.

You are such a loser with the athletic ability of a drunk sloth.
 
ABQCat said:
AZGrizFan said:
Well, I try not to focus on the ones who DON’T choose to come here…for the record, there’s been a couple ‘scat O-linemen from Montana that I’d have loved to have seen in Maroon and Silver over the past 4-5 years as well…

And with him playing MLB, I would guess running lanes/holes are going to close up about THAT much faster….
From what I'm gathering, moving Andersen to Mike has two benefits: 1) he's in a better spot 'call the defense' and keep the unit organized, and 2) it will be hard to scheme against him when he generally lining up at (or near) the opposing Center. There should be no predictable blitz tendencies from (or to) the strong or weak sides. He's expected to play free and find the ball, and should be in a majority of tackles. He should rack up TFLs at a blistering pace. It's the Brian Urlacher model. We shall see. Time will tell.

the griz did something like that with jordan tripp, who made it to the nfl. he was an all-american before that season, but i remember the plan not working nearly as good as hoped for.
 
Garizz, another question I never thought to ask. How long would it take for a sloth to get drunk? Try as I did, I couldn't find the answer on the internet. :party:
 
alabamagrizzly said:
hunt-ducks said:
One additional comment about Onu. From what I saw today, Onu might be able to take away the opponent's best WR with single coverage. It has been some time since we had a CB capable of being that guy. It is only one practice I observed, by Onu smothered every WR who came his way.

Great analysis on the qb’s. I think it’s gonna be Cam’s year but Brown and Britt should have a good battle next year if Britt can catch up. I think Ford will do a decent job of taking care of who ever the #2 receiver is. This is the first year in maybe ever that I feel the CB position is a real strength with a lot of great depth.

Having two dominant corners at this level is an absolute game changer and hard to come by, thats for sure.
 
garizzalies said:
hunt-ducks said:
Nice try dip stick. You and your butt-buddies posted that 3-7-77 and Jesse were me. I have NEVER utilized more than one screen name at a time. You lost the bet, but predictably will welch on it. You are such a loser, and a non-athlete pedestrian fan.
You f###[#] liar. You muther f###[#] liar!

Anyone can go back and look at the posts. I never said shit other than “accept!” Never mentioned 77/Jessie. Quit making shit up.

You were running your fat mouth and got called on it and you ran out the back door as usual.

You made the offer. Not me. Nobody forced you to bet. And you never said shit about “at a time” prior to my acceptance. Trying to weasel out now just shows your character, or lack thereof.

You are such a loser with the athletic ability of a drunk sloth.


Listen to the wimp who was the last one chosen in gym class. I played college athletics, and am a member of "The M Club". You couldn't make a high school girls badminton team. Why don't you slip into something more comfortable... like a coma.
 
Oops
All of lil' Stevi Dills personas are all bitter and butt-hurt at exactly the same time AGAIN

Imagine my surprise
 
ABQCat said:
AZGrizFan said:
Well, I try not to focus on the ones who DON’T choose to come here…for the record, there’s been a couple ‘scat O-linemen from Montana that I’d have loved to have seen in Maroon and Silver over the past 4-5 years as well…

And with him playing MLB, I would guess running lanes/holes are going to close up about THAT much faster….
From what I'm gathering, moving Andersen to Mike has two benefits: 1) he's in a better spot 'call the defense' and keep the unit organized, and 2) it will be hard to scheme against him when he generally lining up at (or near) the opposing Center. There should be no predictable blitz tendencies from (or to) the strong or weak sides. He's expected to play free and find the ball, and should be in a majority of tackles. He should rack up TFLs at a blistering pace. It's the Brian Urlacher model. We shall see. Time will tell.
So I heard you guys signed another linebacker drop down where will he play? Why do you think it will be an advantage to line up your fastest guy at or near the center? Seems to me he is going to get caught up in a lot of traffic inside which would tend to nullify his strengths. I liked watching him play offense because he was so damn explosive. You think your new qb will make up for his 23 rushing tds, doubtful imo.
 
BadlandsGrizFan said:
alabamagrizzly said:
Great analysis on the qb’s. I think it’s gonna be Cam’s year but Brown and Britt should have a good battle next year if Britt can catch up. I think Ford will do a decent job of taking care of who ever the #2 receiver is. This is the first year in maybe ever that I feel the CB position is a real strength with a lot of great depth.

Having two dominant corners at this level is an absolute game changer and hard to come by, thats for sure.

We've four good ones, and our depth will be the best in many years at the CB position. Looks like Bobby got tired of Band-Aiding the CB position with former wide receivers, and made the position a priority. Our pass rush continues to be sketchy, so have great CBs will instantly help in that area.
 
hunt-ducks said:
BadlandsGrizFan said:
Having two dominant corners at this level is an absolute game changer and hard to come by, thats for sure.

We've four good ones, and our depth will be the best in many years at the CB position. Looks like Bobby got tired of Band-Aiding the CB position with former wide receivers, and made the position a priority. Our pass rush continues to be sketchy, so have great CBs will instantly help in that area.

I don’t think it was ever his game plan to “bandaid” the CB position….just seemed like the last couple years many of the corners we offered took offers elsewhere, or didn’t pan out….but i do believe Hicks-Onu, Cotton, Joe, Ford, Walker et.al. Are the real deal….and their relative youth (from a eligibility standpoint) is probably the best news of all.
 
Back
Top