• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

EWU Trouble

ALPHAGRIZ1 said:
snap said:
HannahO said:
snap said:
HannahO. Would it be too much trouble to throw together a tray of sandwiches for me and the boys? I'm hungry.

Sorry, Snap, you'll have to rustle up your own vittles. I'm much to busy to trifle with the likes of you. If you don't have anyone to help you out, well I guess I can understand. You see, most women don't find boorishness an attractive characteristic.


And most men don't find a woman's inability to make a sandwich an attractive characteristic. How are the BLTs coming?

Like real men care that a woman finds us boorish! Thats funny right there... :lol:

Snap, if you have any extra sandwiches I want one.

Here's a little instructional video for you and Snap as real men who obviously need all the help you can get with your sam'wich making.

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=lPBM4gU1zh4
 
The only thing that we would ever care about that comes out of your mouth is...................

Now, I like extra mustard on my BLT


:coffee:

Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk 2
 
ALPHAGRIZ1 said:
The only thing that we would ever care about that comes out of your mouth is...................

Now, I like extra mustard on my BLT


:coffee:

Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk 2

I can see from your clever rejoinder that you don't bring much to the table (pun intended). If your attitude about women even remotely reflects that of the average Montanian it's also pretty obvious why there's Federal investigations and all kinds of other crap going on over there.

But we've strayed pretty far from the original topic and it's clear from your inability to come up with anything but insults and inuendo that you have nothing of substance or intelligence to add. Clearly that's what you do, and in your own pitiful way you do it well. If you come up with anything coherent, please post it .... it would be such a pleasant surprise.
 
MooUBaby said:
Gaeilge1 said:
Just curious. How can you guarantee that?
Because jimmy Wilson killed a guy, bit a girl, kemp and Trumain got tazed, Quin got two DUIs, and Donaldson raped girl, none of the for mentioned got kicked off the team. Is that enough of a guarentee?
you are an idiot..do you know what happened in the jimmy wilson case? cuz if you do you would know that kid got a horse shit deal and deserved a second chance at playin ball after spending 2 years in prison when it turned out to be accidental, and in the defense of himself and a family member

A DUI is not pulling a gun on cops...and if TRU and Kemp were doing the tazing instead of receiving the tazer im sure they would have been dismissed.
 
HannahO said:
ALPHAGRIZ1 said:
The only thing that we would ever care about that comes out of your mouth is...................

Now, I like extra mustard on my BLT


:coffee:

Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk 2

I can see from your clever rejoinder that you don't bring much to the table (pun intended). If your attitude about women even remotely reflects that of the average Montanian it's also pretty obvious why there's Federal investigations and all kinds of other crap going on over there.

But we've strayed pretty far from the original topic and it's clear from your inability to come up with anything but insults and inuendo that you have nothing of substance or intelligence to add. Clearly that's what you do, and in your own pitiful way you do it well. If you come up with anything coherent, please post it .... it would be such a pleasant surprise.

Ahhhh the old I am taking the "high road" routine..........the first sign of insecurity and its also a long way from the laundry room.

Snap likes extra starch...........babe.



:coffee:
 
lakers79 said:
So name calling aside, someone above posting said that since Guyton of EWU hadn't recorded even 1 stat, it was east for Coach Baldwin to kick him off the team. NOT, he would have done that to ANY player for packing a pistol into a local bar. So are you saying the Griz would actually take into account the status of whether the player is valuable to the team or not before dismissing him? I would hope not for a charge of this magnitude. But I guess JJ is still on the team, so you answered my question. And to the other dumb poster who said rape wasn't like pulling a gun on the cops, SHAME!!!
Let's keep both of our football programs clean and educate these athlete's (the offending one's) what college athletics is all about. Represent your University and community, this is a privelage!!
JJ has been accused, not charged or convicted of rape........do you not believe in the fact that as an american your inniocent unitl proven guilty? Nobody but JJ and that girl right now know the truth, but its pretty ovbious this guy pulled out a gun, so he is guilty right? Im just curious, U say JJ is still on the team so that answers your question... well would you agree that he is not yet guilty of a damn thing? or should we just say fuck the trial, or even if he is going to be charged...just put im on the next bus to deerlodge and lock him up?
 
becker2117 said:
MooUBaby said:
Gaeilge1 said:
Just curious. How can you guarantee that?
Because jimmy Wilson killed a guy, bit a girl, kemp and Trumain got tazed, Quin got two DUIs, and Donaldson raped girl, none of the for mentioned got kicked off the team. Is that enough of a guarentee?
you are an idiot..do you know what happened in the jimmy wilson case? cuz if you do you would know that kid got a horse shit deal and deserved a second chance at playin ball after spending 2 years in prison when it turned out to be accidental, and in the defense of himself and a family member

A DUI is not pulling a gun on cops...and if TRU and Kemp were doing the tazing instead of receiving the tazer im sure they would have been dismissed.
the problem with your statement is the same as my statement, we both don't know what happened with Wilson. You think you know because he was acquitted, which in fact you dont know anymore than the average Joe. The difference between our two statements was the fact that I posted this to give an example in order to prove how discipline is handled at um. While you posted to make it known that you are all knowing when it comes to current and former players, which is typical of your fan base.
 
MooUBaby said:
becker2117 said:
MooUBaby said:
Gaeilge1 said:
Just curious. How can you guarantee that?
Because jimmy Wilson killed a guy, bit a girl, kemp and Trumain got tazed, Quin got two DUIs, and Donaldson raped girl, none of the for mentioned got kicked off the team. Is that enough of a guarentee?
you are an idiot..do you know what happened in the jimmy wilson case? cuz if you do you would know that kid got a horse shit deal and deserved a second chance at playin ball after spending 2 years in prison when it turned out to be accidental, and in the defense of himself and a family member

A DUI is not pulling a gun on cops...and if TRU and Kemp were doing the tazing instead of receiving the tazer im sure they would have been dismissed.
the problem with your statement is the same as my statement, we both don't know what happened with Wilson. You think you know because he was acquitted, which in fact you dont know anymore than the average Joe. The difference between our two statements was the fact that I posted this to give an example in order to prove how discipline is handled at um. While you posted to make it known that you are all knowing when it comes to current and former players, which is typical of your fan base.

Actually, we do know what occurred with Wilson, because there were two trials and considerable testimony. 23 of 24 jurors agreed that Wilson was justified in what he did (and no crime was committed), UM's coach, AD and president invited him to return to UM, and the ncaa agreed to give him a special waiver of the 5-year rule. Yet, you come on here to be your normal troll self. You are truly a jerk and a loser, and a pretty dumb one too.
 
MooUBaby said:
becker2117 said:
MooUBaby said:
Gaeilge1 said:
Just curious. How can you guarantee that?
Because jimmy Wilson killed a guy, bit a girl, kemp and Trumain got tazed, Quin got two DUIs, and Donaldson raped girl, none of the for mentioned got kicked off the team. Is that enough of a guarentee?
you are an idiot..do you know what happened in the jimmy wilson case? cuz if you do you would know that kid got a horse shit deal and deserved a second chance at playin ball after spending 2 years in prison when it turned out to be accidental, and in the defense of himself and a family member

A DUI is not pulling a gun on cops...and if TRU and Kemp were doing the tazing instead of receiving the tazer im sure they would have been dismissed.
the problem with your statement is the same as my statement, we both don't know what happened with Wilson. You think you know because he was acquitted, which in fact you dont know anymore than the average Joe. The difference between our two statements was the fact that I posted this to give an example in order to prove how discipline is handled at um. While you posted to make it known that you are all knowing when it comes to current and former players, which is typical of your fan base.


A new low in intelligence from MUB (and that standard was pretty damn tough to meet, say nothing of best).

Well done and congratulations, MUB!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
PlayerRep said:
Growler1 said:
I guarantee you that Hauck and Phlu would not have kicked a player off the team for this. And, even more guaranteed is that Play-A Rape would be defending the player on this board, and blaming the police for instigating the incident.

Hauck and Pflu would have kicked him off the team. Hauck once kicked off an all-american shortly after he waived a gun from a car in Missoula. I "guarantee" that G1 is wrong yet again.

notice p.r. doesn't contest the second part. :thumb:
 
getgrizzy said:
PlayerRep said:
Growler1 said:
I guarantee you that Hauck and Phlu would not have kicked a player off the team for this. And, even more guaranteed is that Play-A Rape would be defending the player on this board, and blaming the police for instigating the incident.

Hauck and Pflu would have kicked him off the team. Hauck once kicked off an all-american shortly after he waived a gun from a car in Missoula. I "guarantee" that G1 is wrong yet again.

notice p.r. doesn't contest the second part. :thumb:

getgrizzy, why are you being such a jerk these days?
 
PlayerRep said:
getgrizzy said:
PlayerRep said:
Growler1 said:
I guarantee you that Hauck and Phlu would not have kicked a player off the team for this. And, even more guaranteed is that Play-A Rape would be defending the player on this board, and blaming the police for instigating the incident.

Hauck and Pflu would have kicked him off the team. Hauck once kicked off an all-american shortly after he waived a gun from a car in Missoula. I "guarantee" that G1 is wrong yet again.

notice p.r. doesn't contest the second part. :thumb:

getgrizzy, why are you being such a jerk these days?

not being a jerk, i'm just pointing out the facts to see if we can get you to be more forthcoming with your information. i think that you're extremely knowledgeable and have connections to inside information, but you rarely offer up info that would lead someone to believe a player did something wrong. i find that to be a strange coincidence and damaging to your credibility.
 
getgrizzy said:
PlayerRep said:
getgrizzy said:
PlayerRep said:
Hauck and Pflu would have kicked him off the team. Hauck once kicked off an all-american shortly after he waived a gun from a car in Missoula. I "guarantee" that G1 is wrong yet again.

notice p.r. doesn't contest the second part. :thumb:

getgrizzy, why are you being such a jerk these days?

not being a jerk, i'm just pointing out the facts to see if we can get you to be more forthcoming with your information. i think that you're extremely knowledgeable and have connections to inside information, but you rarely offer up info that would lead someone to believe a player did something wrong. i find that to be a strange coincidence and damaging to your credibility.

Your recent comment had nothing to do with pointing out facts. It was unnecessary and snippy.

Yes. I support players and coaches. I don't diss them or provide dirt on them. My goal is not to have credibility. I already know that the vast majority of frequent posters/readers know that they can rely on the information and impressions I provide. I always chuckle when a poster who's been dissing me, sends me a PM asking for information. This comment isn't directed at you.
 
PlayerRep said:
getgrizzy said:
PlayerRep said:
getgrizzy said:
notice p.r. doesn't contest the second part. :thumb:

getgrizzy, why are you being such a jerk these days?

not being a jerk, i'm just pointing out the facts to see if we can get you to be more forthcoming with your information. i think that you're extremely knowledgeable and have connections to inside information, but you rarely offer up info that would lead someone to believe a player did something wrong. i find that to be a strange coincidence and damaging to your credibility.

Your recent comment had nothing to do with pointing out facts. It was unnecessary and snippy.

Yes. I support players and coaches. I don't diss them or provide dirt on them. My goal is not to have credibility. I already know that the vast majority of frequent posters/readers know that they can rely on the information and impressions I provide. I always chuckle when a poster who's been dissing me, sends me a PM asking for information. This comment isn't directed at you.

the fact being that you rarely (have you ever?) provide info that puts a player in a negative light. you can't tell me you have none. you do go out of your way to provide info that puts a player in a positive light. it isn't about dissing them, it's about disclosing what you've been told. it isn't that we don't believe the info you provide, but that you don't provide all the info you have.
 
getgrizzy said:
PlayerRep said:
getgrizzy said:
PlayerRep said:
getgrizzy, why are you being such a jerk these days?

not being a jerk, i'm just pointing out the facts to see if we can get you to be more forthcoming with your information. i think that you're extremely knowledgeable and have connections to inside information, but you rarely offer up info that would lead someone to believe a player did something wrong. i find that to be a strange coincidence and damaging to your credibility.

Your recent comment had nothing to do with pointing out facts. It was unnecessary and snippy.

Yes. I support players and coaches. I don't diss them or provide dirt on them. My goal is not to have credibility. I already know that the vast majority of frequent posters/readers know that they can rely on the information and impressions I provide. I always chuckle when a poster who's been dissing me, sends me a PM asking for information. This comment isn't directed at you.

the fact being that you rarely (have you ever?) provide info that puts a player in a negative light. you can't tell me you have none. you do go out of your way to provide info that puts a player in a positive light. it isn't about dissing them, it's about disclosing what you've been told. it isn't that we don't believe the info you provide, but that you don't provide all the info you have.

Yes, I don't post all of the info I know. In fact, I post about 10% of what I know. Yes, occasionally I have heard something negative about a player, and I don't post it. Again, note the name playerrep. It's not playerdisser or playertattletailer.
 
PlayerRep said:
getgrizzy said:
PlayerRep said:
getgrizzy said:
not being a jerk, i'm just pointing out the facts to see if we can get you to be more forthcoming with your information. i think that you're extremely knowledgeable and have connections to inside information, but you rarely offer up info that would lead someone to believe a player did something wrong. i find that to be a strange coincidence and damaging to your credibility.

Your recent comment had nothing to do with pointing out facts. It was unnecessary and snippy.

Yes. I support players and coaches. I don't diss them or provide dirt on them. My goal is not to have credibility. I already know that the vast majority of frequent posters/readers know that they can rely on the information and impressions I provide. I always chuckle when a poster who's been dissing me, sends me a PM asking for information. This comment isn't directed at you.

the fact being that you rarely (have you ever?) provide info that puts a player in a negative light. you can't tell me you have none. you do go out of your way to provide info that puts a player in a positive light. it isn't about dissing them, it's about disclosing what you've been told. it isn't that we don't believe the info you provide, but that you don't provide all the info you have.

Yes, I don't post all of the info I know. In fact, I post about 10% of what I know. Yes, occasionally I have heard something negative about a player, and I don't post it. Again, note the name playerrep. It's not playerdisser or playertattletailer.

Egriz- Making people feel important since 2001
 
PlayerRep said:
Yes. I support players and coaches.

I support the women who are the victims of rape or domestic violence. I also support players and coaches whom hold the same moral values that I do. I don't ever "write off" an incident as trivial just because charges weren't filed or because a player is remorseful.
 
PlayerRep said:
Yes, I don't post all of the info I know. In fact, I post about 10% of what I know. Yes, occasionally I have heard something negative about a player, and I don't post it. Again, note the name playerrep. It's not playerdisser or playertattletailer.

You post 10% of what you know, which is 100% of the positive.
 
grizcountry420 said:
PlayerRep said:
getgrizzy said:
PlayerRep said:
Your recent comment had nothing to do with pointing out facts. It was unnecessary and snippy.

Yes. I support players and coaches. I don't diss them or provide dirt on them. My goal is not to have credibility. I already know that the vast majority of frequent posters/readers know that they can rely on the information and impressions I provide. I always chuckle when a poster who's been dissing me, sends me a PM asking for information. This comment isn't directed at you.

the fact being that you rarely (have you ever?) provide info that puts a player in a negative light. you can't tell me you have none. you do go out of your way to provide info that puts a player in a positive light. it isn't about dissing them, it's about disclosing what you've been told. it isn't that we don't believe the info you provide, but that you don't provide all the info you have.

Yes, I don't post all of the info I know. In fact, I post about 10% of what I know. Yes, occasionally I have heard something negative about a player, and I don't post it. Again, note the name playerrep. It's not playerdisser or playertattletailer.

Egriz- Making people feel important since 2001
:lol:
 
Back
Top