EverettGriz said:
Correct. UM doesn’t value rebounding as much as some successful teams.
Much like most successful teams don’t value not turning the ball over like UM. Or how successful teams don’t play defense like Montana. Or how successful teams don’t shoot FTs like Montana.
There are a lot of ways to be successful, but very few teams who are. Thank God Montana is one of them.
Rebounding, especially on the offensive boards gives teams another possession and an opportunity to score. Pretty plan and simple and if you have the horses to get those boards it’s an important part of your offense. But unfortunately the Griz do not have the horses. Offensive rebounds is more of a “by chance” opportunity. By that I mean the ball can come off the rim in all sorts of bounces so it’s not something you can game plan for. Unless you have the size and quickness to go to the boards, which we do not, then Travis’s strategy is to get back on defense. If you’ll note we do not get beat very often in the transition game.
A common complaint I hear on this board is why don’t the shooters follow their shots? Good shooters pretty much know when the ball leaves their hands if it’s going in or not. Again, I thinks it’s a coaching philosophy to get back on defense and with our lack of size I would defer to the coach who just won his 100th conference game.
For the most part I think offensive rebounding is like the forward pass in football; one of three things can happen, completion, incomplete or interception. In basketball with undersized and smaller players the same results can happen; another possession, loss of ball and transition basket or fouling.
I’m merely an observer and in no way an expert on the game of basketball.