UMGriz75
Well-known member
Five years ago, it would have been easier to answer the question. As I have long pointed out, once an organization enters a "death spiral," it is much, much more complex and there is no guarantee of success, indeed, there is, typically, collapse. We may be witnessing that at the University of Montana. It's unprecedented.grzz said:75, I would be curious to hear your thoughts on how the University gets back on track. At the risk of asking for a long post, much of your diagnosis of problems with the University as a whole I agree with. What do we need in the next President, how does the enrollment issue get fixed, and so on.
A few years ago, the United States Olympic Committee (USOC) appointed me to a "governance task force" to analyze something very much like this: the collapse of a "national governing body" (NGB) for one of the Olympic sports. The purpose was to 1) analyze what went wrong, 2) what are the alternatives to "fix it," and 3) what are the recommended ways to "fix it." That was the second time I was appointed by the USOC to that kind of "reorganization" situation.
I spent approximately 1,000 hours on that final report to the USOC. I cited to approximately 200 peer-reviewed studies on organizational management and the role of leadership, and the history of organizational structures, both "for-profit" and "non-profit." We did extensive analytical work on correlations within that NGB between policies, behaviors, and results -- both financial and in sport success at the international level.
The final Report in that instance is about 400 pages. The solutions are both broad and mundane. I don't have 400 pages here. Too many Trolls for egriz to be an asset to the University of Montana. It will continue as its moderators command, a bulletin board for their friends to insult people.
Irregardless of my views in that report, that kind of study is necessary when "an organization goes haywire." Board of Regents, continuing its own policy of missing the point, isn't doing that. So already, we are off to a bad start, being led by the same people that put us here.
If you look at the "search committee," these are people that have been firmly entrenched in the problem. It is not a commitment to change or even understanding the need for it.
I'd be glad to PM you the recent USOC work, as an example, just one, of "governance studies of organizations in trouble," but I would have to kill you if you used that to disclose that to what role I play at UM since the "Athletics" administrative and coaching experience might be obvious to some.