NorthwestFresh said:This entire thread is so stupid it should just be deleted to stop further embarrassment.
No, there is no case to be made for "entrapment".
None
Zero
If stupid qualifies something for deletion, I assume you'll be gone soon?
NorthwestFresh said:This entire thread is so stupid it should just be deleted to stop further embarrassment.
No, there is no case to be made for "entrapment".
None
Zero
EverettGriz said:NorthwestFresh said:This entire thread is so stupid it should just be deleted to stop further embarrassment.
No, there is no case to be made for "entrapment".
None
Zero
If stupid qualifies something for deletion, I assume you'll be gone soon?
NorthwestFresh said:EverettGriz said:NorthwestFresh said:This entire thread is so stupid it should just be deleted to stop further embarrassment.
No, there is no case to be made for "entrapment".
None
Zero
If stupid qualifies something for deletion, I assume you'll be gone soon?
Derherher
"Entrapment" is not a valid defense in this case. The trial is ongoing. Nobody knows what the jury is thinking. It would be nice to be talking about football like most other schools at this point instead of concocting cockamamie hypothetical defenses for a guy on trial for rape.
AZGrizFan said:She is/was an obvious nutjob that I wouldn't have touched with a 10-foot pole for that exact reason.
Spanky said:The lady set up JJ. She picked him up, took him to her house, then her bedroom and jumped in the sack with him. She planned and executed the event. Why? Revenge?