The_Real_Chief
Well-known member
I mean hasn't Urban won a few titles already with a big physical running QB and a spread offense?
UMGriz75 said:You've got the "6 games" in the wrong place. He went from 3-2 conference his first season to 6-2 in the Atlantic Conference his second season, the conference champion. His overall record his second year was 9-5.BWahlberg said:Oh and one other thing, in his 2nd full season as a head coach Dabo Swinney won 6 games. After that his teams posted double digit wins every single season.
You meant to say that, right?
And you meant to point out that he went 4-4 conference his third year, after he had all his own "recruits," somehow managing to lose seven games total by some magical power of "double digit wins."
Or were you referring to a different Dabo Swinney?
What, exactly, was your point?
kemajic said:That up-tempo Montana spread offense ran 59 plays against a poor MSU team.
BWahlberg said:UMGriz75 said:You've got the "6 games" in the wrong place. He went from 3-2 conference his first season to 6-2 in the Atlantic Conference his second season, the conference champion. His overall record his second year was 9-5.BWahlberg said:Oh and one other thing, in his 2nd full season as a head coach Dabo Swinney won 6 games. After that his teams posted double digit wins every single season.
You meant to say that, right?
And you meant to point out that he went 4-4 conference his third year, after he had all his own "recruits," somehow managing to lose seven games total by some magical power of "double digit wins."
Or were you referring to a different Dabo Swinney?
What, exactly, was your point?
2nd full season as HC. Full being the key word
His first actual season as head coach he was an interim for the last 7 games.
His second actual season but first full season with the team he went 9-5. His third actual season but SECOND full season he went 6-7 overall.
It wold appear that even good coaches can have early bumps in the road. Good thing Clemson didn't fire him. Maybe Stitt deserves similar consideration. Additionally his third full season (fourth actual season as HC) his team was mostly his recruits. From there his teams went 10-4, 11-2, 11-2, 10-3, 14-1, and 14-1
My point is sometimes coaches need a little bit of time and maybe some people should chill the F out and see how things transpire.
Ursus1 said:Some of these are hilarious and an awesome lesson in fuzzy logic. Clemson/Dabo/Bama/Saban. Saban won a ton of titles, lost on a pick play.....he was using a true freshman QB, yet Stitt's program can get reliable QB play out of anyone.....let alone play a true freshman at QB. Clemson LOST last year with that offense, and without a pick play would gave again. Dabo and Saban should not even have Stitt mentoned in the same post as them.....they both teams to championships, not left out of a 24 team playoff system!!
AZDoc said:BWahlberg said:UMGriz75 said:You've got the "6 games" in the wrong place. He went from 3-2 conference his first season to 6-2 in the Atlantic Conference his second season, the conference champion. His overall record his second year was 9-5.BWahlberg said:Oh and one other thing, in his 2nd full season as a head coach Dabo Swinney won 6 games. After that his teams posted double digit wins every single season.
You meant to say that, right?
And you meant to point out that he went 4-4 conference his third year, after he had all his own "recruits," somehow managing to lose seven games total by some magical power of "double digit wins."
Or were you referring to a different Dabo Swinney?
What, exactly, was your point?
2nd full season as HC. Full being the key word
His first actual season as head coach he was an interim for the last 7 games.
His second actual season but first full season with the team he went 9-5. His third actual season but SECOND full season he went 6-7 overall.
It wold appear that even good coaches can have early bumps in the road. Good thing Clemson didn't fire him. Maybe Stitt deserves similar consideration. Additionally his third full season (fourth actual season as HC) his team was mostly his recruits. From there his teams went 10-4, 11-2, 11-2, 10-3, 14-1, and 14-1
My point is sometimes coaches need a little bit of time and maybe some people should chill the F out and see how things transpire.
Wow...where is he? That was one of the best fact filled azz kickings I've seen in a while. I hope it's true lol
wbtfg said:Great game last night....
Watson and Williams are big time talents no doubt about it. That said, I think the turning point of the game was when Alabama's stud running back went out and the true freshman QB was forced to shoulder more of the load. If Scarborough, who already had 2 TD's and was ripping off runs at 6 ypc doesn't get hurt, Alabama wins the game.
UMGriz75 said:You've got the "6 games" in the wrong place. He went from 3-2 conference his first season to 6-2 in the Atlantic Conference his second season, the conference champion. His overall record his second year was 9-5.BWahlberg said:Oh and one other thing, in his 2nd full season as a head coach Dabo Swinney won 6 games. After that his teams posted double digit wins every single season.
You meant to say that, right?
And you meant to point out that he went 4-4 conference his third year, after he had all his own "recruits," somehow managing to lose seven games total by some magical power of "double digit wins."
Or were you referring to a different Dabo Swinney?
What, exactly, was your point?
It was the Russians!HelenaHandBasket said:Ursus1 said:Some of these are hilarious and an awesome lesson in fuzzy logic. Clemson/Dabo/Bama/Saban. Saban won a ton of titles, lost on a pick play.....he was using a true freshman QB, yet Stitt's program can get reliable QB play out of anyone.....let alone play a true freshman at QB. Clemson LOST last year with that offense, and without a pick play would gave again. Dabo and Saban should not even have Stitt mentoned in the same post as them.....they both teams to championships, not left out of a 24 team playoff system!!
Why is everyone so bent out of shape about the final touchdown play?
horribilisfan8184 said:wbtfg said:Great game last night....
Watson and Williams are big time talents no doubt about it. That said, I think the turning point of the game was when Alabama's stud running back went out and the true freshman QB was forced to shoulder more of the load. If Scarborough, who already had 2 TD's and was ripping off runs at 6 ypc doesn't get hurt, Alabama wins the game.
I think you are right. Not sure 'Bama converted another 3rd down after he left the game.
That's quite the spin. As an "interim" head coach, he wasn't an actual head coach, so it doesn't count. Seriously? You mean, he went 6-2 conference his "actual first year" and then the flop 4-4 was his actual second year, right? Then, by manipulating the term "interim coach" that means he had a good year his third year, instead of the bad year.BWahlberg said:His first actual season as head coach he was an interim for the last 7 games.
His second actual season but first full season with the team he went 9-5. His third actual season but SECOND full season he went 6-7 overall.
It wold appear that even good coaches can have early bumps in the road. ...
My point is sometimes coaches need a little bit of time and maybe some people should chill the F out and see how things transpire.
BWahlberg said:Up tempo offense
Goal to run 90+ plays
Gas the defense
Relied upon a dynamic QB and playmaker WRs.
Very strong defense but not "the best" defense (Alabama had that)
(Shrugs)
But it'll never work in the fcs right? lol
I agree with Doc! POTY! Should be a new category: Beat down of the Year Award. Ironically put together by one of the nicest posters on the board.AZDoc said:BWahlberg said:UMGriz75 said:You've got the "6 games" in the wrong place. He went from 3-2 conference his first season to 6-2 in the Atlantic Conference his second season, the conference champion. His overall record his second year was 9-5.BWahlberg said:Oh and one other thing, in his 2nd full season as a head coach Dabo Swinney won 6 games. After that his teams posted double digit wins every single season.
You meant to say that, right?
And you meant to point out that he went 4-4 conference his third year, after he had all his own "recruits," somehow managing to lose seven games total by some magical power of "double digit wins."
Or were you referring to a different Dabo Swinney?
What, exactly, was your point?
2nd full season as HC. Full being the key word
His first actual season as head coach he was an interim for the last 7 games.
His second actual season but first full season with the team he went 9-5. His third actual season but SECOND full season he went 6-7 overall.
It wold appear that even good coaches can have early bumps in the road. Good thing Clemson didn't fire him. Maybe Stitt deserves similar consideration. Additionally his third full season (fourth actual season as HC) his team was mostly his recruits. From there his teams went 10-4, 11-2, 11-2, 10-3, 14-1, and 14-1
My point is sometimes coaches need a little bit of time and maybe some people should chill the F out and see how things transpire.
Wow...where is he? That was one of the best fact filled azz kickings I've seen in a while. I hope it's true lol
UMGriz75 said:That's quite the spin. As an "interim" head coach, he wasn't an actual head coach, so it doesn't count. Seriously? You mean, he went 6-2 conference his "actual first year" and then the flop 4-4 was his actual second year, right? Then, by manipulating the term "interim coach" that means he had a good year his third year, instead of the bad year.BWahlberg said:His first actual season as head coach he was an interim for the last 7 games.
His second actual season but first full season with the team he went 9-5. His third actual season but SECOND full season he went 6-7 overall.
It wold appear that even good coaches can have early bumps in the road. ...
My point is sometimes coaches need a little bit of time and maybe some people should chill the F out and see how things transpire.
Have you surveyed how many coaches went in exactly the opposite direction after their first coaching year? Why not? It's not the records, so much, as it is WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENED, and the fact that it represented a trend here begun in the first year.
Maybe you should stop spinning what actually happened this year and grow the F up. You know, just to coin a phrase for you. I generally enjoy your posts but when you need to turn asshole just because somebody calls you on a bad set of facts, well, good luck with that strategy.