• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Defensing Stitt's Offense

BWahlberg said:
grizcountry420 said:
BWahlberg said:
If early practices are any indicator Gregorak has it figured out. Press-coverage and heavy blitzing. Should be interesting to see Stitt's offense adjust as these guys get more comfortable in the new system.


I heard that Chris Parker is having a solid week on the defensive side of the ball..

Solid is an understatement :thumb: Nelson, McKinley and Parker have been picking off passes and blowing up a lot of plays since last week. Pick-6's, INTs, PBU's, you name it.

Amazing what more aggressive pass defensive schemes can do. Thanks for the update. :thumb:
 
mtgrizrule said:
BWahlberg said:
grizcountry420 said:
BWahlberg said:
If early practices are any indicator Gregorak has it figured out. Press-coverage and heavy blitzing. Should be interesting to see Stitt's offense adjust as these guys get more comfortable in the new system.


I heard that Chris Parker is having a solid week on the defensive side of the ball..

Solid is an understatement :thumb: Nelson, McKinley and Parker have been picking off passes and blowing up a lot of plays since last week. Pick-6's, INTs, PBU's, you name it.

Amazing what more aggressive pass defensive schemes can do. Thanks for the update. :thumb:

Add in that both McKinley and Parker now pass the "eye test". They look like they've added good muscle and size. They play a lot more physical than they did in practice last year. It would seem the development of these two younger corners is coming along well. Nelson is the fast guy in the group and the tall one, he's playing well. Nate Harris sprained his ankle bad on the very first day so he's out probably for most of spring ball. I'm feeling pretty good about our corners at this point - although it is early and they're playing against an offense without a decided upon #1 QB that just learned their system a week ago.
 
mtgrizrule said:
spsyk said:
Htowngriz said:
spsyk said:
I'll go on the limb and say defenses will be competitive at the FBS level, and coach Stitt's offense will not be anything that won't be able to adapt to and defend, and he will continue with mediocrity as he had in the fifteen years at School Of Mines.

He will probably win as many NC that he has on his resume thus far, and hopefully win more conference titles that are on his resume.

With all the hype and anticipation posted here on EGriz, sure make his mountain to climb an accomplishment that few can complete, hope he is the ONE.

Although I wait till the start of the season, and play one game at a time, before installing coach Stitt into the Walk Of Fame.

Whatever happens I for one won't be disappointed, with his success, and hopefully not a failure.

It's a big step for him, and it appears he is up to the challenge.

Look, we all love UM, but it is NOT CSM academics-wise. Pretty much all he had to work with there were eggheads and valedictorians who could also play a little football. Give him a chance with the kind of talent we're able to bring in before you doom him to mediocrity.


Never doom him to mediocrity, just stated the evident, his record at School Of Mines, I am hoping for the best for him, I'm just not ready to make him coach of the year without coaching one game at the FBS level.

You are right, it appears and looks like the athletes that he will lead are here, let's wait and see what happens before installing coach Stitt to the Walk Of Fame.

I don't consider the positive fan support to GRIZ fans putting him to a Walk of Fame level. What I see is excitement from a stagnant, impatient, passionate, and caring fan base. Stitt has this support because of his innovative approach. In addition, he gets the expectations, our fans, culture, and state.

I remember when his name 1st surfaced. There were a lot of naysayers, doubters, and fans asking "Who"? I was not negative toward him, just did not know much about him. I took the time to research him more. By the time I did, I was thought he was well worth giving the benefit of the doubt to. Then, he was hired. He sold me more at his press conference. Then he closed recruiting out strong. At the recruiting banquet, I got meet him. I was even more sold on Stitt.

I feel I am an example of many GRIZ fans having gradually learned to respect Stitt and excited to see what results he brings to GRIZ football. It is nice to have some fresh blood and new approach leading GRIZ football. Stitt's hire will make or break Kent Haslam. I for one believe Still will turn out to be one of the best hires in GRIZ football history.

Can't say that I was a naysayer, or doubter, however I can say that I thought with the stature of the Griz program, it could have done better than a down level 15 year tenured average coach.
I like yourself looked into coach Stitt's, with the exceptions of a few accolades about his not so innovative with the exception of the Fly Sweep play offense, has only maintained a vanilla career at School Of Mines.

The questions I asked myself was, after his two attempts in trying to secure the Head job at Northern Colorado was unsuccessful. WHY!

Why didn't Joe Glenn his mentioned mentor offer him a job as a offense corrindator job, more over those that flowered him about his offensive prowess also never offered him a job. WHY!

Now, with that all said, I'm hoping that coach Stitt is the offensive genius described in the threads of this forum and the program will be able to keep him around before one of the top twenty five FBS teams or even the NFL $$$$$$$ steal him away.

If coach Stitt lives up to the expectations of the faithful that wanders the threads of EGriz, I don't expect him to fulfill his contract.
 
You can't get rid of the ball as quickly as Griz QBs are expected to get rid of it unless your WRs are in the right position. If they're not in position, you're going to get picked. I'm not putting all the blame on receivers for the picks in practice. I'm just saying that things will improve once everyone is where they need to be and the QBs are consistently making the right reads.
 
spsyk said:
mtgrizrule said:
spsyk said:
Htowngriz said:
Look, we all love UM, but it is NOT CSM academics-wise. Pretty much all he had to work with there were eggheads and valedictorians who could also play a little football. Give him a chance with the kind of talent we're able to bring in before you doom him to mediocrity.


Never doom him to mediocrity, just stated the evident, his record at School Of Mines, I am hoping for the best for him, I'm just not ready to make him coach of the year without coaching one game at the FBS level.

You are right, it appears and looks like the athletes that he will lead are here, let's wait and see what happens before installing coach Stitt to the Walk Of Fame.

I don't consider the positive fan support to GRIZ fans putting him to a Walk of Fame level. What I see is excitement from a stagnant, impatient, passionate, and caring fan base. Stitt has this support because of his innovative approach. In addition, he gets the expectations, our fans, culture, and state.

I remember when his name 1st surfaced. There were a lot of naysayers, doubters, and fans asking "Who"? I was not negative toward him, just did not know much about him. I took the time to research him more. By the time I did, I was thought he was well worth giving the benefit of the doubt to. Then, he was hired. He sold me more at his press conference. Then he closed recruiting out strong. At the recruiting banquet, I got meet him. I was even more sold on Stitt.

I feel I am an example of many GRIZ fans having gradually learned to respect Stitt and excited to see what results he brings to GRIZ football. It is nice to have some fresh blood and new approach leading GRIZ football. Stitt's hire will make or break Kent Haslam. I for one believe Still will turn out to be one of the best hires in GRIZ football history.

Can't say that I was a naysayer, or doubter, however I can say that I thought with the stature of the Griz program, it could have done better than a down level 15 year tenured average coach.
I like yourself looked into coach Stitt's, with the exceptions of a few accolades about his not so innovative with the exception of the Fly Sweep play offense, has only maintained a vanilla career at School Of Mines.

The questions I asked myself was, after his two attempts in trying to secure the Head job at Northern Colorado was unsuccessful. WHY!

Why didn't Joe Glenn his mentioned mentor offer him a job as a offense corrindator job, more over those that flowered him about his offensive prowess also never offered him a job. WHY!

Now, with that all said, I'm hoping that coach Stitt is the offensive genius described in the threads of this forum and the program will be able to keep him around before one of the top twenty five FBS teams or even the NFL $$$$$$$ steal him away.

If coach Stitt lives up to the expectations of the faithful that wanders the threads of EGriz, I don't expect him to fulfill his contract.

Many have said this already, but here goes again--

When assessing Bob Stitt's career at Colorado Mines, you have to take into account several things:

1. What was the program like before he took it over?
2. What did he have to work with?
3. What did he do with the the program?

Answers:
1. Colorado Mines was a decades'-long joke in their conference and division, having only a handful of winning seasons in the past 50 years. The last coach who had a winning career record at Mines was in the period from 1922-23. In other words, over 75 years of massive fail.

2. Engineers...smart ones, apparently--but not, as a whole, great football players. He had to deal with incredibly tough admissions and academic requirements, and still find people who could play. Were they smarter than most of their opponents? Undoubtedly. Did they have athletes that matched up physically with most of their opponents? Not so much. Against teams like Div II national champ CSU-Pueblo (which smoked FCS playoff team Sam Houston State last year 47-21 on the road), they had decidedly lesser talent, but still managed to compete (Mines lost to CSU-Pueblo 20-12 last year).

3. Coach Stitt went 108-62 (.635) all-time at Mines, and 83-44 in conference, had the first undefeated regular season in the school's history, and got them to the playoffs a couple of times. He developed a Harlon Hill winner (Div II's Payton) and 16 Div. II All-Americans. He's the only coach in the school's history with more than 20 games on his resumé with a career winning record. Damn impressive coming from basically nothing and working with less than optimal talent (to put it mildly).

Let's just see what he does with Montana's talent and the new talent he's brought in before we assign him the label "mediocre".

He's not starting with a bare cupboard like he had at Mines. I have a feeling that his offense will translate just fine to this team and level, especially since the upperclassmen on the team are Pflugrad spread guys (not Delaney ground and pound recruits).
 
He had offers to be OC at FBS schools, but as he stated....he wanted control of the program. He had offers for FCS, but as he stated....he didn't want just any FCS job.
 
CrunchGriz said:
spsyk said:
mtgrizrule said:
spsyk said:
Never doom him to mediocrity, just stated the evident, his record at School Of Mines, I am hoping for the best for him, I'm just not ready to make him coach of the year without coaching one game at the FBS level.

You are right, it appears and looks like the athletes that he will lead are here, let's wait and see what happens before installing coach Stitt to the Walk Of Fame.

I don't consider the positive fan support to GRIZ fans putting him to a Walk of Fame level. What I see is excitement from a stagnant, impatient, passionate, and caring fan base. Stitt has this support because of his innovative approach. In addition, he gets the expectations, our fans, culture, and state.

I remember when his name 1st surfaced. There were a lot of naysayers, doubters, and fans asking "Who"? I was not negative toward him, just did not know much about him. I took the time to research him more. By the time I did, I was thought he was well worth giving the benefit of the doubt to. Then, he was hired. He sold me more at his press conference. Then he closed recruiting out strong. At the recruiting banquet, I got meet him. I was even more sold on Stitt.

I feel I am an example of many GRIZ fans having gradually learned to respect Stitt and excited to see what results he brings to GRIZ football. It is nice to have some fresh blood and new approach leading GRIZ football. Stitt's hire will make or break Kent Haslam. I for one believe Still will turn out to be one of the best hires in GRIZ football history.

Can't say that I was a naysayer, or doubter, however I can say that I thought with the stature of the Griz program, it could have done better than a down level 15 year tenured average coach.
I like yourself looked into coach Stitt's, with the exceptions of a few accolades about his not so innovative with the exception of the Fly Sweep play offense, has only maintained a vanilla career at School Of Mines.

The questions I asked myself was, after his two attempts in trying to secure the Head job at Northern Colorado was unsuccessful. WHY!

Why didn't Joe Glenn his mentioned mentor offer him a job as a offense corrindator job, more over those that flowered him about his offensive prowess also never offered him a job. WHY!

Now, with that all said, I'm hoping that coach Stitt is the offensive genius described in the threads of this forum and the program will be able to keep him around before one of the top twenty five FBS teams or even the NFL $$$$$$$ steal him away.

If coach Stitt lives up to the expectations of the faithful that wanders the threads of EGriz, I don't expect him to fulfill his contract.

Many have said this already, but here goes again--

When assessing Bob Stitt's career at Colorado Mines, you have to take into account several things:

1. What was the program like before he took it over?
2. What did he have to work with?
3. What did he do with the the program?

Answers:
1. Colorado Mines was a decades'-long joke in their conference and division, having only a handful of winning seasons in the past 50 years. The last coach who had a winning career record at Mines was in the period from 1922-23. In other words, over 75 years of massive fail.

2. Engineers...smart ones, apparently--but not, as a whole, great football players. He had to deal with incredibly tough admissions and academic requirements, and still find people who could play. Were they smarter than most of their opponents? Undoubtedly. Did they have athletes that matched up physically with most of their opponents? Not so much. Against teams like Div II national champ CSU-Pueblo (which smoked FCS playoff team Sam Houston State last year 47-21 on the road), they had decidedly lesser talent, but still managed to compete (Mines lost to CSU-Pueblo 20-12 last year).

3. Coach Stitt went 108-62 (.635) all-time at Mines, and 83-44 in conference, had the first undefeated regular season in the school's history, and got them to the playoffs a couple of times. He developed a Harlon Hill winner (Div II's Payton) and 16 Div. II All-Americans. He's the only coach in the school's history with more than 20 games on his resumé with a career winning record. Damn impressive coming from basically nothing and working with less than optimal talent (to put it mildly).

Let's just see what he does with Montana's talent and the new talent he's brought in before we assign him the label "mediocre".

He's not starting with a bare cupboard like he had at Mines. I have a feeling that his offense will translate just fine to this team and level, especially since the upperclassmen on the team are Pflugrad spread guys (not Delaney ground and pound recruits).

So, since a bunch of you have dubbed "Ron" Ash a .500 coach, even writing books about how to be a .500 coach, and in actuality his winning percentage is WAY better than Stitt's, at a higher division, can we start talking about how Stitt should author books like, "How to be a SUB .500 coach"? :lol:
 
brewskis said:
He had offers to be OC at FBS schools, but as he stated....he wanted control of the program. He had offers for FCS, but as he stated....he didn't want just any FCS job.

That's completely false. He applied for the UNC job twice, only to be rejected both times. He has ties to UNC, as he was an assistant coach in Greeley and his mentor was our O.C. during our D2 glory days and then our head coach during our early years during the transition from D2 to D1.

Not saying he will be a bad coach, only time will tell; but please don't tell me he never wanted to be an FCS school and he was just waiting for a job like Montana to open up.
 
Griz!ron said:
Teams will want keep the ball in front of them, force the Griz to complete many short passes waiting for us to make a drive killing mistake. With a new system, mistakes will be made. Until the point where we prove we can hit the short passes consistently, with few mistakes.

In the first few games we will have the advantage of surprise, as there won't be a whole lot of film available to study. Hopefully that will compensate for our lack of proficiency with the system. I'd like to see us play NDSU twice in 2015, just so we can see the growth in a single season. Look at how much better Coastal Carolina did vs the Bizon from 2013 (48-14) playoffs to 2014 playoffs (39-32).


A few good signs will be:

If you see defenders look squirrelly, appearing that they don't know which player to cover. This is a foundation of Stitt scheme; Put a player in a pickle and make him wrong.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HGDvNPDOARY" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; (watch the second half of the clip.)

When teams start using reduced fronts to get more defenders out in coverage. It'll mean that they don't believe that their base defense will work.
Thanks, GI. The sort of Xs & Os I was looking for.
 
Sky Bear, false? He was "invited" to put in for the head job at UNC by the AD. He stated he was not very excited to become the head coach and was not sure he'd take the job if they offered. They did not and he remained happy. In the end it was plain he did NOT want that job. Period.

Ask him if U suspect I am wrong.
 
Umista said:
Sky Bear, false? He was "invited" to put in for the head job at UNC by the AD. He stated he was not very excited to become the head coach and was not sure he'd take the job if they offered. They did not and he remained happy. In the end it was plain he did NOT want that job. Period.

Ask him if U suspect I am wrong.

Possibly, but he did apply. Twice.
 
BigSkyBears said:
brewskis said:
He had offers to be OC at FBS schools, but as he stated....he wanted control of the program. He had offers for FCS, but as he stated....he didn't want just any FCS job.

That's completely false. He applied for the UNC job twice, only to be rejected both times. He has ties to UNC, as he was an assistant coach in Greeley and his mentor was our O.C. during our D2 glory days and then our head coach during our early years during the transition from D2 to D1.

Not saying he will be a bad coach, only time will tell; but please don't tell me he never wanted to be an FCS school and he was just waiting for a job like Montana to open up.
I will tell you that....but I dont have to. He says that almost verbatim in his first press conference. He explicitly says that he wasn't leaving CSM for just any job.
 
BigSkyBears said:
Umista said:
Sky Bear, false? He was "invited" to put in for the head job at UNC by the AD. He stated he was not very excited to become the head coach and was not sure he'd take the job if they offered. They did not and he remained happy. In the end it was plain he did NOT want that job. Period.

Ask him if U suspect I am wrong.

Possibly, but he did apply. Twice.

I am sure many of us have applied for a job, been contacted then later decided not to go forward with it, for whatever reasons. I know I have. :thumb:
 
brewskis said:
He had offers to be OC at FBS schools, but as he stated....he wanted control of the program. He had offers for FCS, but as he stated....he didn't want just any FCS job.

For my reading pleasure, please direct me where I can confirm in my own mind to all these FBS & FCS job offers.
 
CrunchGriz said:
spsyk said:
mtgrizrule said:
spsyk said:
Never doom him to mediocrity, just stated the evident, his record at School Of Mines, I am hoping for the best for him, I'm just not ready to make him coach of the year without coaching one game at the FBS level.

You are right, it appears and looks like the athletes that he will lead are here, let's wait and see what happens before installing coach Stitt to the Walk Of Fame.

I don't consider the positive fan support to GRIZ fans putting him to a Walk of Fame level. What I see is excitement from a stagnant, impatient, passionate, and caring fan base. Stitt has this support because of his innovative approach. In addition, he gets the expectations, our fans, culture, and state.

I remember when his name 1st surfaced. There were a lot of naysayers, doubters, and fans asking "Who"? I was not negative toward him, just did not know much about him. I took the time to research him more. By the time I did, I was thought he was well worth giving the benefit of the doubt to. Then, he was hired. He sold me more at his press conference. Then he closed recruiting out strong. At the recruiting banquet, I got meet him. I was even more sold on Stitt.

I feel I am an example of many GRIZ fans having gradually learned to respect Stitt and excited to see what results he brings to GRIZ football. It is nice to have some fresh blood and new approach leading GRIZ football. Stitt's hire will make or break Kent Haslam. I for one believe Still will turn out to be one of the best hires in GRIZ football history.

Can't say that I was a naysayer, or doubter, however I can say that I thought with the stature of the Griz program, it could have done better than a down level 15 year tenured average coach.
I like yourself looked into coach Stitt's, with the exceptions of a few accolades about his not so innovative with the exception of the Fly Sweep play offense, has only maintained a vanilla career at School Of Mines.

The questions I asked myself was, after his two attempts in trying to secure the Head job at Northern Colorado was unsuccessful. WHY!

Why didn't Joe Glenn his mentioned mentor offer him a job as a offense corrindator job, more over those that flowered him about his offensive prowess also never offered him a job. WHY!

Now, with that all said, I'm hoping that coach Stitt is the offensive genius described in the threads of this forum and the program will be able to keep him around before one of the top twenty five FBS teams or even the NFL $$$$$$$ steal him away.

If coach Stitt lives up to the expectations of the faithful that wanders the threads of EGriz, I don't expect him to fulfill his contract.

Many have said this already, but here goes again--

When assessing Bob Stitt's career at Colorado Mines, you have to take into account several things:

1. What was the program like before he took it over?
2. What did he have to work with?
3. What did he do with the the program?

Answers:
1. Colorado Mines was a decades'-long joke in their conference and division, having only a handful of winning seasons in the past 50 years. The last coach who had a winning career record at Mines was in the period from 1922-23. In other words, over 75 years of massive fail.

2. Engineers...smart ones, apparently--but not, as a whole, great football players. He had to deal with incredibly tough admissions and academic requirements, and still find people who could play. Were they smarter than most of their opponents? Undoubtedly. Did they have athletes that matched up physically with most of their opponents? Not so much. Against teams like Div II national champ CSU-Pueblo (which smoked FCS playoff team Sam Houston State last year 47-21 on the road), they had decidedly lesser talent, but still managed to compete (Mines lost to CSU-Pueblo 20-12 last year).

3. Coach Stitt went 108-62 (.635) all-time at Mines, and 83-44 in conference, had the first undefeated regular season in the school's history, and got them to the playoffs a couple of times. He developed a Harlon Hill winner (Div II's Payton) and 16 Div. II All-Americans. He's the only coach in the school's history with more than 20 games on his resumé with a career winning record. Damn impressive coming from basically nothing and working with less than optimal talent (to put it mildly).

Let's just see what he does with Montana's talent and the new talent he's brought in before we assign him the label "mediocre".

He's not starting with a bare cupboard like he had at Mines. I have a feeling that his offense will translate just fine to this team and level, especially since the upperclassmen on the team are Pflugrad spread guys (not Delaney ground and pound recruits).
It's too late for your bullshit rationalizations! I read on egriz that we're going to suck this year.

Adios Fuckers!! I'm out! I'm making CDA proud of me...

monk.jpg
 
CrunchGriz said:
spsyk said:
mtgrizrule said:
spsyk said:
Never doom him to mediocrity, just stated the evident, his record at School Of Mines, I am hoping for the best for him, I'm just not ready to make him coach of the year without coaching one game at the FBS level.

You are right, it appears and looks like the athletes that he will lead are here, let's wait and see what happens before installing coach Stitt to the Walk Of Fame.

I don't consider the positive fan support to GRIZ fans putting him to a Walk of Fame level. What I see is excitement from a stagnant, impatient, passionate, and caring fan base. Stitt has this support because of his innovative approach. In addition, he gets the expectations, our fans, culture, and state.

I remember when his name 1st surfaced. There were a lot of naysayers, doubters, and fans asking "Who"? I was not negative toward him, just did not know much about him. I took the time to research him more. By the time I did, I was thought he was well worth giving the benefit of the doubt to. Then, he was hired. He sold me more at his press conference. Then he closed recruiting out strong. At the recruiting banquet, I got meet him. I was even more sold on Stitt.

I feel I am an example of many GRIZ fans having gradually learned to respect Stitt and excited to see what results he brings to GRIZ football. It is nice to have some fresh blood and new approach leading GRIZ football. Stitt's hire will make or break Kent Haslam. I for one believe Still will turn out to be one of the best hires in GRIZ football history.

Can't say that I was a naysayer, or doubter, however I can say that I thought with the stature of the Griz program, it could have done better than a down level 15 year tenured average coach.
I like yourself looked into coach Stitt's, with the exceptions of a few accolades about his not so innovative with the exception of the Fly Sweep play offense, has only maintained a vanilla career at School Of Mines.

The questions I asked myself was, after his two attempts in trying to secure the Head job at Northern Colorado was unsuccessful. WHY!

Why didn't Joe Glenn his mentioned mentor offer him a job as a offense corrindator job, more over those that flowered him about his offensive prowess also never offered him a job. WHY!

Now, with that all said, I'm hoping that coach Stitt is the offensive genius described in the threads of this forum and the program will be able to keep him around before one of the top twenty five FBS teams or even the NFL $$$$$$$ steal him away.

If coach Stitt lives up to the expectations of the faithful that wanders the threads of EGriz, I don't expect him to fulfill his contract.

Many have said this already, but here goes again--

When assessing Bob Stitt's career at Colorado Mines, you have to take into account several things:

1. What was the program like before he took it over?
2. What did he have to work with?
3. What did he do with the the program?

Answers:
1. Colorado Mines was a decades'-long joke in their conference and division, having only a handful of winning seasons in the past 50 years. The last coach who had a winning career record at Mines was in the period from 1922-23. In other words, over 75 years of massive fail.

2. Engineers...smart ones, apparently--but not, as a whole, great football players. He had to deal with incredibly tough admissions and academic requirements, and still find people who could play. Were they smarter than most of their opponents? Undoubtedly. Did they have athletes that matched up physically with most of their opponents? Not so much. Against teams like Div II national champ CSU-Pueblo (which smoked FCS playoff team Sam Houston State last year 47-21 on the road), they had decidedly lesser talent, but still managed to compete (Mines lost to CSU-Pueblo 20-12 last year).

3. Coach Stitt went 108-62 (.635) all-time at Mines, and 83-44 in conference, had the first undefeated regular season in the school's history, and got them to the playoffs a couple of times. He developed a Harlon Hill winner (Div II's Payton) and 16 Div. II All-Americans. He's the only coach in the school's history with more than 20 games on his resumé with a career winning record. Damn impressive coming from basically nothing and working with less than optimal talent (to put it mildly).

Let's just see what he does with Montana's talent and the new talent he's brought in before we assign him the label "mediocre".

He's not starting with a bare cupboard like he had at Mines. I have a feeling that his offense will translate just fine to this team and level, especially since the upperclassmen on the team are Pflugrad spread guys (not Delaney ground and pound recruits).

We as fans have no choice, to wait and to see what coach Stitt's accomplishments will become as the head coach for the GRIZ, he is the head coach.

However with the expectations reveling in the threads of this forum, are they achievable for anyone, including the offensive genius of coach Stitt, and will it take 4 - 15 years for him to live up to his reputation of an offensive genius...

I believe coach Stitt is good coach, a good motivator,and a good leader, however he has a big hill to climb, take away the Fly Sweep, and the hurry up spread offense is nothing new, and none of the national championship teams utilize the scheme.

I'm all for exciting football, thought wins are more of a priority for me, and it will be great to see exciting football and a win at the conclusion.
 
Ursa Major said:
No hill for a climber, Sissy!
No shit. I'm all in until Stitt calls a play I don't like or something doesn't work. Then I knew it was a mistake to hire him until The Griz score 17 points in the 4 minutes to pull out a win, then I'm all in again. Get ready for some serious flip flopping M'fers.
 
Grizbeer said:
Ursa Major said:
No hill for a climber, Sissy!
No shit. I'm all in until Stitt calls a play I don't like or something doesn't work. Then I knew it was a mistake to hire him until The Griz score 17 points in the 4 minutes to pull out a win, then I'm all in again. Get ready for some serious flip flopping M'fers.

Beer, you are a true egrizzer and a fine American!!

Missing those drunken game threads where opinions change as rapidly as costumes at a Beyonce concert!
 
Back
Top