Defense Metrics

[grizindabox]

75,
By nature and by training I'm a critical thinker and I'm not a bandwagon kind of guy either. I agree with some of the things you are saying. It's your methods that I can't abide. I hate bullies. Intellectual bullies are the worst.

If I went about trying to change the point of view of everyone that doesn't agree with me, I would be a miserable bastard. Good Luck!

You would have to note my response to Brewski's claims, a direct recitation of the record.

You could compare his vehement response, ad hominem remarks and name-calling.

I think you got the bullies mixed up, but I will give as good as I get; and I do get tired of the routine name-calling. But, you've got your standards. Live them.

Holy hell I dread 75s posts.

There is a club....they meet on the second Tuesday of the week....out at the ol' still behind the Munro place....bring your own jug....

 

[ALPHAGRIZ1]

75,
By nature and by training I'm a critical thinker and I'm not a bandwagon kind of guy either. I agree with some of the things you are saying. It's your methods that I can't abide. I hate bullies. Intellectual bullies are the worst.

If I went about trying to change the point of view of everyone that doesn't agree with me, I would be a miserable bastard. Good Luck!

You would have to note my response to Brewski's claims, a direct recitation of the record.

You could compare his vehement response, ad hominem remarks and name-calling.

I think you got the bullies mixed up, but I will give as good as I get; and I do get tired of the routine name-calling. But, you've got your standards. Live them.

Holy hell I dread 75s posts.

I know, what planet is that guy from?

I do like the ambiguously gay duo shot at PlayaRapE and him.

#nailedit

 

[ALPHAGRIZ1]

75,
By nature and by training I'm a critical thinker and I'm not a bandwagon kind of guy either. I agree with some of the things you are saying. It's your methods that I can't abide. I hate bullies. Intellectual bullies are the worst.

If I went about trying to change the point of view of everyone that doesn't agree with me, I would be a miserable bastard. Good Luck!

You would have to note my response to Brewski's claims, a direct recitation of the record.

You could compare his vehement response, ad hominem remarks and name-calling.

I think you got the bullies mixed up, but I will give as good as I get; and I do get tired of the routine name-calling. But, you've got your standards. Live them.

Holy hell I dread 75s posts.

There is a club....they meet on the second Tuesday of the week....out at the ol' still behind the Munro place....bring your own jug....

#onmyway

 

[UMGriz75]

Holy hell I dread 75s posts.

Believe me, yours are no picnic. But, there is a button ...

 

[BadlandsGrizFan]

Holy hell I dread 75s posts.

Believe me, yours are no picnic. But, there is a button ...

I just dont understand how you have the energy to combat every single thing someone posts....or the reason you try and use your excellent writing skills to win arguments....we get it man you were a journalism major or something...you should get with PlayaHater and write a book about how hes a lawyer!

 

[PlayerRep]

75,
By nature and by training I'm a critical thinker and I'm not a bandwagon kind of guy either. I agree with some of the things you are saying. It's your methods that I can't abide. I hate bullies. Intellectual bullies are the worst.

If I went about trying to change the point of view of everyone that doesn't agree with me, I would be a miserable bastard. Good Luck!

You would have to note my response to Brewski's claims, a direct recitation of the record.

You could compare his vehement response, ad hominem remarks and name-calling.

I think you got the bullies mixed up, but I will give as good as I get; and I do get tired of the routine name-calling. But, you've got your standards. Live them.

Holy hell I dread 75s posts.

I enjoy 75's posts. And, at least, 75's posts are written so that it can be understood what he is saying.

 

[BadlandsGrizFan]

75,
By nature and by training I'm a critical thinker and I'm not a bandwagon kind of guy either. I agree with some of the things you are saying. It's your methods that I can't abide. I hate bullies. Intellectual bullies are the worst.

If I went about trying to change the point of view of everyone that doesn't agree with me, I would be a miserable bastard. Good Luck!

You would have to note my response to Brewski's claims, a direct recitation of the record.

You could compare his vehement response, ad hominem remarks and name-calling.

I think you got the bullies mixed up, but I will give as good as I get; and I do get tired of the routine name-calling. But, you've got your standards. Live them.

Holy hell I dread 75s posts.

I enjoy 75's posts. And, at least, 75's posts are written so that it can be understood what he is saying.

And like clockwork, BatPlaya arrives!

 

[AZGrizFan]

Which came first, the chicken or the egg? Did their offense get worse? Or did they just start facing better defenses?

This is the problem. "Here's what actually happened ...". "No, it didn't because of something else over here." "Better defenses." "If the defenses get better over the season, is that scheduling or season improvement." "It depends on which DC we are trying to validate." "Don't offenses improve?" "It depends on whether we are talking Stitt in August or Stitt in December." "So the answer is yes and no, depending on the opponent?" "Yes." "And No." "Even if it is the same opponent?" "Especially if it is the same opponent." "If defense gets better over the season, why did UM's drop a full touchdown to opponents in the last half of the season?" "Because they were facing better offenses." "But, also those offenses were worse because they were facing better defenses." "Our "better" defense got worse because EWU and MSU were facing "better defenses" because we had a better DC." "So, what actually happened has no bearing on what actually happened because of this other stuff?" "Yes."

This is the Mobious loop of Football Fandom.

You have completely jumped the shark. Your posts are like reading Dr. Seuss now....

 

[horribilisfan8184]

Which came first, the chicken or the egg? Did their offense get worse? Or did they just start facing better defenses?

This is the problem. "Here's what actually happened ...". "No, it didn't because of something else over here." "Better defenses." "If the defenses get better over the season, is that scheduling or season improvement." "It depends on which DC we are trying to validate." "Don't offenses improve?" "It depends on whether we are talking Stitt in August or Stitt in December." "So the answer is yes and no, depending on the opponent?" "Yes." "And No." "Even if it is the same opponent?" "Especially if it is the same opponent." "If defense gets better over the season, why did UM's drop a full touchdown to opponents in the last half of the season?" "Because they were facing better offenses." "But, also those offenses were worse because they were facing better defenses." "Our "better" defense got worse because EWU and MSU were facing "better defenses" because we had a better DC." "So, what actually happened has no bearing on what actually happened because of this other stuff?" "Yes."

This is the Mobious loop of Football Fandom.

You have completely jumped the shark. Your posts are like reading Dr. Seuss now....

Man I love a Fonzie reference. Good work!!

 

[AZGrizFan]

Which came first, the chicken or the egg? Did their offense get worse? Or did they just start facing better defenses?

This is the problem. "Here's what actually happened ...". "No, it didn't because of something else over here." "Better defenses." "If the defenses get better over the season, is that scheduling or season improvement." "It depends on which DC we are trying to validate." "Don't offenses improve?" "It depends on whether we are talking Stitt in August or Stitt in December." "So the answer is yes and no, depending on the opponent?" "Yes." "And No." "Even if it is the same opponent?" "Especially if it is the same opponent." "If defense gets better over the season, why did UM's drop a full touchdown to opponents in the last half of the season?" "Because they were facing better offenses." "But, also those offenses were worse because they were facing better defenses." "Our "better" defense got worse because EWU and MSU were facing "better defenses" because we had a better DC." "So, what actually happened has no bearing on what actually happened because of this other stuff?" "Yes."

This is the Mobious loop of Football Fandom.

You have completely jumped the shark. Your posts are like reading Dr. Seuss now....

Man I love a Fonzie reference. Good work!!

It's Dr. Seuss's "The Mobious Loop!"

 

[tgreseth]

This is the problem. "Here's what actually happened ...". "No, it didn't because of something else over here." "Better defenses." "If the defenses get better over the season, is that scheduling or season improvement." "It depends on which DC we are trying to validate." "Don't offenses improve?" "It depends on whether we are talking Stitt in August or Stitt in December." "So the answer is yes and no, depending on the opponent?" "Yes." "And No." "Even if it is the same opponent?" "Especially if it is the same opponent." "If defense gets better over the season, why did UM's drop a full touchdown to opponents in the last half of the season?" "Because they were facing better offenses." "But, also those offenses were worse because they were facing better defenses." "Our "better" defense got worse because EWU and MSU were facing "better defenses" because we had a better DC." "So, what actually happened has no bearing on what actually happened because of this other stuff?" "Yes."

This is the Mobious loop of Football Fandom.

You have completely jumped the shark. Your posts are like reading Dr. Seuss now....

Man I love a Fonzie reference. Good work!!

It's Dr. Seuss's "The Mobious Loop!"

 

[horribilisfan8184]

This is the problem. "Here's what actually happened ...". "No, it didn't because of something else over here." "Better defenses." "If the defenses get better over the season, is that scheduling or season improvement." "It depends on which DC we are trying to validate." "Don't offenses improve?" "It depends on whether we are talking Stitt in August or Stitt in December." "So the answer is yes and no, depending on the opponent?" "Yes." "And No." "Even if it is the same opponent?" "Especially if it is the same opponent." "If defense gets better over the season, why did UM's drop a full touchdown to opponents in the last half of the season?" "Because they were facing better offenses." "But, also those offenses were worse because they were facing better defenses." "Our "better" defense got worse because EWU and MSU were facing "better defenses" because we had a better DC." "So, what actually happened has no bearing on what actually happened because of this other stuff?" "Yes."

This is the Mobious loop of Football Fandom.

You have completely jumped the shark. Your posts are like reading Dr. Seuss now....

Man I love a Fonzie reference. Good work!!

It's Dr. Seuss's "The Mobious Loop!"