75 has an agenda when it comes to the football program....he will deny it.....but he does....
-
Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!
Daum
- Thread starter kemajic
- Start date
- Status
grizcountry420
Well-known member
grizindabox said:
There's just no way around it.. When someone is posting on a monday morning at 1:58am, the same drivel over and over, they certainly do have an agenda.
grizindabox said:
75 seems to have some doubts on Stitt and had some views on the qb situation, but what do you think his "agenda" is?
I find that some posters think that posters who disagree with them, or don't agree with them, have an "agenda". Agenda seems more like a buzz word than anything meaningful most of the time it's used on egriz.
grizcountry420
Well-known member
PlayerRep said:
Take a look in the mirror big shot...
:finger:
grizcountry420
Well-known member
griz5700 said:
griz5700 said:
5700....are you the pot or the kettle......and what exactly do you think my "agenda" is.....
I have blasted no player...I am simply saying every word out of you mouth is cutting someone down and you seem to like to speak on behalf of the players. PS...I certainly do not believe that you are important...so no advantage there. That is laughable!UMGriz75 said:
UMGriz75
Well-known member
Anyone that disagrees with "grizindabox" must have an "agenda."PlayerRep said:
After all, he mightily huffed, Stitt needs the opportunity to recruit his own players, fully in tune with and capable of being on a "Stitt" team!
Then, one of the best reecruits meeting that criteria left. After a tranche of postings from those always claiming to be in the "know" that this departure was not about football or the team, that the Coach in no way can be responsible for anything, frantically pedaling the meme -- the agenda -- that this was but a "personal problem" for which there could be "hundreds of reasons" that all deserved privacy, none other than the player himself responded to refute them. It was all about the team experience.
In being true to the "agenda," the usual suspects responded in the usual fashion:
1) despite the player's statement, it was vague and therefore not really true, and surely no match for the concise claims that there could be "hundreds" of reasons why he left,
2) apparently he wasn't tough enough -- "thought Butte kids were tough."
3) in high school, he wasn't that good of a player anyway,
4) He was just one of the "ilk,"
5) he never played a game, so who cares.
Nice bunch. But typical. And also interesting from the folks who demanded respect for his "privacy" but offered no respect for him.
No better example of "agendas" and the shattering of them can be demonstrated than by this thread.
The fact is, cumulatively there is an exodus of players from this team, and the buzz from them and from remaining players reflects a level of unhappiness about this Coach and one of his assistants. When this Coach was first interviewed and said he got his people skills from Joe Glenn, I thought that was a great positive. It was one of many reasons for my initial enthusiasm for the man. After a few public remarks, some sidelines behavior and a public temper tantrum, I realized that wasn't true. And, the undercurrent of player conversations suggests it is far from true.
A good coach can coach players to success. That's what they do. Some believe that players can be intimidated and browbeaten to success. Some perhaps even believe it is necessary. Perhaps that is true, I would just not prefer that as a lesson to be learned from collegiate football at the University of Montana. We have enough problems as it is without creating a new one.
UMGriz75 said:
All I see is your normal approach.....just ignore the question and change the subject quickly.....par for the course....
UMGriz75 said:
Far from the truth.....but a person that does nothing but continually post negatively about something would seem to have an agenda.....
UMGriz75
Well-known member
A lot goes into these decisions. To give up a full scholarship, with a talent load promising the stars, a great deal had to be at work to cause the result. Merely being unhappy with the coach isn't usually enough. Sometimes under great life pressures, you look to your sport, your teammates, your team, and your coaches for the support necessary to get past the other obstacles. That didn't happen here, and he said so.HookedonGriz said:
However, when you claim one thing, and the player claims the opposite, it is a bit disingenuous to claim that the player must be wrong, and that at some point, he will concede to your transcendent insider knowledge, that has so far been consistently wrong.
Do you agree he is now "player ilk" as one of your regular cohorts as claimed on this thread?
It seems if you wanted to generate more plausible faux outrage, that view would justify it in spades.
Tellingly, it does not.
- Status
