• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Corey Widmer declines Montana Football Hall of Fame

SoldierGriz said:
MrTitleist said:
The responses to this thread are not only laughable, but fairly predictable. Do you guys that say, "he knew the risks" even possess the brain power to think that in 2018 the technology involved in doing CT scans on brains has grown so greatly that we're seeing things in 2018 that we didn't in 1970? 1980? 90? 00? In the 70s and 80s the helmets were made of basically nothing. Now they're made with all sorts of nutso technology that gets simulated in car crashes to see the impact zones and where needs to be beefed up? I can guarandamntee you that in 1980 we didn't have the technology available to diagnose CTE. Now that it can be diagnosed it's been a shot in the ass for everyone that has, does, or will play football. The NFL may or may not have known about these risks, and that will be settled in court eventually, but they certainly weren't armed with the information then that they have now.

There are anecdotal examples of players stepping away from the game. But, the truth is the vast majority now know the risks and they play anyway.

Note what Sam said just right above this.. prevention, training, etc are much better now than it used to be. Some risks are being mitigated much more now than ever before. Football, in theory, is much safer now than it used to be.
 
MrTitleist said:
SoldierGriz said:
MrTitleist said:
The responses to this thread are not only laughable, but fairly predictable. Do you guys that say, "he knew the risks" even possess the brain power to think that in 2018 the technology involved in doing CT scans on brains has grown so greatly that we're seeing things in 2018 that we didn't in 1970? 1980? 90? 00? In the 70s and 80s the helmets were made of basically nothing. Now they're made with all sorts of nutso technology that gets simulated in car crashes to see the impact zones and where needs to be beefed up? I can guarandamntee you that in 1980 we didn't have the technology available to diagnose CTE. Now that it can be diagnosed it's been a shot in the ass for everyone that has, does, or will play football. The NFL may or may not have known about these risks, and that will be settled in court eventually, but they certainly weren't armed with the information then that they have now.

There are anecdotal examples of players stepping away from the game. But, the truth is the vast majority now know the risks and they play anyway.

Note what Sam said just right above this.. prevention, training, etc are much better now than it used to be. Some risks are being mitigated much more now than ever before. Football, in theory, is much safer now than it used to be.

Agree - progress made. The Army and the NFL have actually worked extensively on the topic of concussions and traumatic brain injuries. I hope Widmer is OK and finds peace.
 
I went to high school with a great kid, one of the brightest in our class, who received a concussion when he was a junior. His academics were never the same and he never quite reached the potential he had. I think of him often whenever I hear the talking heads on tv saying "great hit" or, "good no call" and I don't respond but something in me wants to speak out for the many who did not know what we know now.
 
GrizLA said:
I went to high school with a great kid, one of the brightest in our class, who received a concussion when he was a junior. His academics were never the same and he never quite reached the potential he had. I think of him often whenever I hear the talking heads on tv saying "great hit" or, "good no call" and I don't respond but something in me wants to speak out for the many who did not know what we know now.

Based upon many of your prior posts, I'd simply dismissed you as an individual with an inflated sense of self-worth; i.e., an egotistical pos, but this post lent a bit or rational reasoning to your tone. After over 40 years of involvement in this game, having watched a high school kid break his neck and spend the remainder of his life in a wheelchair before passing, I've wondered on a daily basis if I would allow my children, if I had it to do over again, to play this game. I love it so much and at times I wonder if I hurt and can't sleep at night is because of the crap I endured in the military or this great game. In all honesty, I don't think I would allow my kids to play football, even with all the safety precautions being implemented. In fact, I believe I'd rather they learn to box.
 
SoldierGriz said:
Agree - progress made. The Army and the NFL have actually worked extensively on the topic of concussions and traumatic brain injuries. I hope Widmer is OK and finds peace.

The Army is doing interesting stuff with concussions and research. They're investing a lot of money in it as they're on the hook for their solders' medical bills after discharge and you know a lot of guys come back and their brains are potentially scrambled from a variety of things that happen in a combat zone.
 
Kinda silly, really? This deal was made up so Bozeman could actually have a minuscule hall of fame to go to and like these runny nosed kids marching in the streets it will be forgotten by this time next year!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Bozeman is a "PRETETIOUS"place! :( :(
 
i_the_sky said:
Kinda silly, really? This deal was made up so Bozeman could actually have a minuscule hall of fame to go to and like these runny nosed kids marching in the streets it will be forgotten by this time next year!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Bozeman is a "PRETETIOUS"place! :( :(

First of all, "pretetious" is not a word.

Secondly, there were at least as many Griz greats there as Bobcats. Maybe more. I agree that Widmer has every right to decline an award without judgment and criticism. Nobody knows what he's been through.

Anyone consider the fact that stepping up and accepting an induction into the MT Football HOF would very negatively affect his lawsuits against the NCAA and NFL? Surely his attorney advised against it.
 
GGNez said:
i_the_sky said:
Kinda silly, really? This deal was made up so Bozeman could actually have a minuscule hall of fame to go to and like these runny nosed kids marching in the streets it will be forgotten by this time next year!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Bozeman is a "PRETETIOUS"place! :( :(

First of all, "pretetious" is not a word.

Secondly, there were at least as many Griz greats there as Bobcats. Maybe more. I agree that Widmer has every right to decline an award without judgment and criticism. Nobody knows what he's been through.

Anyone consider the fact that stepping up and accepting an induction into the MT Football HOF would very negatively affect his lawsuits against the NCAA and NFL? Surely his attorney advised against it.

Bingo! Give this lady a fine cigar. Make it a Partagas Series P No. 2. (now that you can import them from Cuba for person use

Always follow the money, folks.
 
MrTitleist said:
The responses to this thread are not only laughable, but fairly predictable. Do you guys that say, "he knew the risks" even possess the brain power to think that in 2018 the technology involved in doing CT scans on brains has grown so greatly that we're seeing things in 2018 that we didn't in 1970? 1980? 90? 00? In the 70s and 80s the helmets were made of basically nothing. Now they're made with all sorts of nutso technology that gets simulated in car crashes to see the impact zones and where needs to be beefed up? I can guarandamntee you that in 1980 we didn't have the technology available to diagnose CTE. Now that it can be diagnosed it's been a shot in the ass for everyone that has, does, or will play football. The NFL may or may not have known about these risks, and that will be settled in court eventually, but they certainly weren't armed with the information then that they have now.
No...no they don't
 
I don't understand why people get so bent out of shape over shit like this. He declined. He has his reasons. Key word there: HIS, FFS.
 
AZGrizFan said:
I don't understand why people get so bent out of shape over shit like this.

Flight delayed. I just ordered a scotch @ an airport bar in Denver & fired up egriz. Guess it was my turn to snort/spit out what I was drinking. :lol:
 
grizband said:
MrTitleist said:
The responses to this thread are not only laughable, but fairly predictable. Do you guys that say, "he knew the risks" even possess the brain power to think that in 2018 the technology involved in doing CT scans on brains has grown so greatly that we're seeing things in 2018 that we didn't in 1970? 1980? 90? 00? In the 70s and 80s the helmets were made of basically nothing. Now they're made with all sorts of nutso technology that gets simulated in car crashes to see the impact zones and where needs to be beefed up? I can guarandamntee you that in 1980 we didn't have the technology available to diagnose CTE. Now that it can be diagnosed it's been a shot in the ass for everyone that has, does, or will play football. The NFL may or may not have known about these risks, and that will be settled in court eventually, but they certainly weren't armed with the information then that they have now.
No...no they don't

The condition now known as CTE was discovered/diagnosed/recognized in boxers in the 1920's. http://www.protectthebrain.org/Brain-Injury-Research/Dementia-Pugilistica.aspx

The Longest Yard and North Dallas Forty featured bell-rung blithering characters back in 1974 and 1979. It used to be a well known component of the game. Been going on in other high impact sports like rugby just as long. Grandma didn't have a CT scanner but she knew enough to warn you too many hits could leave you a drooling idiot. You know, back when people used common sense.
 
horribilisfan8184 said:
grizband said:
MrTitleist said:
The responses to this thread are not only laughable, but fairly predictable. Do you guys that say, "he knew the risks" even possess the brain power to think that in 2018 the technology involved in doing CT scans on brains has grown so greatly that we're seeing things in 2018 that we didn't in 1970? 1980? 90? 00? In the 70s and 80s the helmets were made of basically nothing. Now they're made with all sorts of nutso technology that gets simulated in car crashes to see the impact zones and where needs to be beefed up? I can guarandamntee you that in 1980 we didn't have the technology available to diagnose CTE. Now that it can be diagnosed it's been a shot in the ass for everyone that has, does, or will play football. The NFL may or may not have known about these risks, and that will be settled in court eventually, but they certainly weren't armed with the information then that they have now.
No...no they don't

The condition now known as CTE was discovered/diagnosed/recognized in boxers in the 1920's. http://www.protectthebrain.org/Brain-Injury-Research/Dementia-Pugilistica.aspx

The Longest Yard and North Dallas Forty featured bell-rung blithering characters back in 1974 and 1979. It used to be a well known component of the game. Been going on in other high impact sports like rugby just as long. Grandma didn't have a CT scanner but she knew enough to warn you too many hits could leave you a drooling idiot. You know, back when people used common sense.

The prevention and handling of concussions is much different than it was 15 years ago. Talking to old timers, it wasn't handled hardly at all back when Widmer played...

Kem & PR, do you remember any concussion protocol besides how many fingers am I holding up and what's your name?
 
...picked up by the national news...
...a great story and why wouldn't it...
...awareness is the start of the cure...

... 8-) ...
 
I found it interesting that he said at 14, if he knew what he knows now, or if the risks had been explained to him he would give it all back (the money, the fame) Not an exact quote, you can read the article but that's what I got out of it.

As mentioned, we do know so much more now about prevention and protection and awareness than we did when he first started playing football. So at the very least a young athlete can weigh the information and make a choice.

With that said at 14 you don't always make the best decisions. You're invincible, money and fame may seem more important than it turns out to be in the long run. In hindsight, yes, he would have turned it all away but at the time would he have really or continued on the path he ultimately chose?

I know at 14, I made some choices I regret, and at 18 and 22....and yesterday, but at the time that's what I did and I certainly thought I was making the right decision regardless of what others were telling me.
 
Back
Top