• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Contract Renewal

mthoopsfan said:
AZGrizFan said:
He made three statements. 1) the toughest part of our schedule with Idaho, Sac, MSU and Vikings is ahead of us; 2) we need to win 3 of the remaining games, which would put us at 8-3. 3) He then said our best shots are UNC, PSU and SAC.

It’s pretty clear despite your attempts to muddy the waters or your lack of reading comprehension.
Click to expand...

No, your point 1 is correct, but your point 2 isn't. He then said that the Griz have to win 3 of "these" games, not the remaining games. Those 4 he listed. And in another post, he said he assumed we would beat UNC. So, the way he wrote it, he was saying we needed to win 4 games. Read before you post. I even re-posted the quote up there. I will post it again below. Read it and then issue your apology or admission you were wrong. And, I was trying to unmuddy the waters.

"but we still have the toughest part of our schedule coming up with Idaho, SAC and MSU, Vikings may not be a slouch either. Bare minimum we need to win 3 of these games to have a shot at the playoffs"
Click to expand...

I read it the first time and interpreted it exactly like it was intended. You’re the only one who’s misinterpreting what he said.
 
This game didn't change my opinion one bit. Anything short of beating the cats and making the semis and it's time for a change.
 
Hasn’t changed my mind. I just think injecting some new energy into the football program would dovetail nicely with what appears to be an ascendant trajectory for the University in general.
 
AZGrizFan said:
mthoopsfan said:
No, your point 1 is correct, but your point 2 isn't. He then said that the Griz have to win 3 of "these" games, not the remaining games. Those 4 he listed. And in another post, he said he assumed we would beat UNC. So, the way he wrote it, he was saying we needed to win 4 games. Read before you post. I even re-posted the quote up there. I will post it again below. Read it and then issue your apology or admission you were wrong. And, I was trying to unmuddy the waters.

"but we still have the toughest part of our schedule coming up with Idaho, SAC and MSU, Vikings may not be a slouch either. Bare minimum we need to win 3 of these games to have a shot at the playoffs"
Click to expand...

I read it the first time and interpreted it exactly like it was intended. You’re the only one who’s misinterpreting what he said.
Click to expand...

It says we have to win 3 of Idaho, SS, MSU and Vikings to make playoffs. That is not true.
 
mthoopsfan said:
AZGrizFan said:
I read it the first time and interpreted it exactly like it was intended. You’re the only one who’s misinterpreting what he said.
Click to expand...

It says we have to win 3 of Idaho, SS, MSU and Vikings to make playoffs. That is not true.
Click to expand...

Only if you interpret it incorrectly.
 
AZGrizFan said:
mthoopsfan said:
It says we have to win 3 of Idaho, SS, MSU and Vikings to make playoffs. That is not true.
Click to expand...

Only if you interpret it incorrectly.
Click to expand...

Nope. It's clear that I got it right. What do you think the below word "these" refers to? NCU wasn't even mentioned until later in the post, after I asked a question.

"but we still have the toughest part of our schedule coming up with Idaho, SAC and MSU, Vikings may not be a slouch either. Bare minimum we need to win 3 of these games to have a shot at the playoffs"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top