TheRadiers
Member
Like a Ash prepared team! What does that mean?
ronancatfan said:bhubris said:Funny actually..watching the gizz eat their own.
Where's my "like" button??
They were not preparedTheRadiers said:Like a Ash prepared team! What does that mean?
Peyton isn't a moderator, I have watched this site for years. He is a dictator and he single handedly ruined it by playing favorites to the usual trolls.UMGriz75 said:Well, actually, the loudmouths who aggressively patrolled these threads attacking any poster who might have pointed to the limitations of this coach and his experience, and who might have dared to criticize his management of player relations and motivations, are pretty damned quiet today, for sure. This includes certain moderators.bhumble said:Funny actually..watching the gizz eat their own.
My thoughts exactlyGrizRanger said:I saw a poorly coached, uninspired team today. Special teams are bad, offense and defense are inept. Griz need a new coaching staff.
UMGriz75 said:Bottom line: young men just don't want to play football for Bob Stitt. If it wasn't for scholarships and this being a life dream for most of them, difficult to give up even under onerous circumstances, we might not have had a team on the field this past month. They are sick of the guy.
I have never, in well over 40 years at this University, seen a football coach so disliked by his team.
The logical fallacy is that, with more resources, Stitt "might" have accomplished more. Of course, so might his opponents at the DII level. And you can make the argument for every failure that ever happened. It's an age old excuse for failure, not a recommendation for a Head Coach position. Somehow, UM got that backwards. The fact is, this was a hire that was vastly oversold.spsyk said:Look he is going to accomplish this in three years, or perhaps six, what he couldn't in fifteen years?
UMGriz75 said:The logical fallacy is that, with more resources, Stitt "might" have accomplished more. Of course, so might his opponents at the DII level. And you can make the argument for every failure that ever happened. It's an age old excuse for failure, not a recommendation for a Head Coach position. Somehow, UM got that backwards. The fact is, this was a hire that was vastly oversold.spsyk said:Look he is going to accomplish this in three years, or perhaps six, what he couldn't in fifteen years?
None of the "hype" was true. There is no "innovative" offense. There is no "creative" thinking. Instead, we have a coach who can't inspire, alienates his team and disparages them in public, and is surprisingly unadaptable and inflexible, both on and off the field.
There is nothing there that even remotely suggests that he needs another year to "make it work." There is nothing there to "make work."