Coach's show?

[Umista]

So me being one of the short mis-guided posters I am complexed by this over my head "Unity" thing.

If the Offense scores many points against Cal Poly does that mean it was caused by Unity?
On the other hand if the Griz offense does not do well is it called dis-unity or perhaps mis-unity?

If and when our offense begins to roll what shall we call it? Surprise? I hope NOT Unity!
I am not the only carpet bagger that would like to see a great performance but if we can keep ourselves together for one more week perhaps we will have our answer.

 

[UMGriz75]

@75 - I presume you understand that you are inferring what he intends. You are just guessing. You must be able to see that...? And if not then I just wasted 30 seconds typing this.

I have no idea what he "intends," "infers," or even "suspects." I can't agree with those posters who continually project their views onto Stitt, "Stitt intends to ...," "Stitt will recruit QBs that are fast and smart ...," and so forth.

In this case, I quoted his specific words.

Is that what you have the problem with?

 

[AZGrizFan]

This is another "wow, coach discovered that team unity is a big reason for success" moment that some egriz fans continue to marvel at, apparently arguing that the Griz had a horrible season last year and that "Cal Poly" was because of "lack of team unity" but that after bravely "making changes last year" the problem was solved as shown at NDSU, and that somehow when Stitt says that the defense, because of being "silent," kept the "offense off of the field" because the "offense" would have turned the ball over and lost the game and that "silence" was the key to victory whereas running an offense would have been the key to defeat.

HolyrunonsentencesBatman! That's a lot of "quotes"....I think you missed a couple.

 

[UMGriz75]

This is another "wow, coach discovered that team unity is a big reason for success" moment that some egriz fans continue to marvel at, apparently arguing that the Griz had a horrible season last year and that "Cal Poly" was because of "lack of team unity" but that after bravely "making changes last year" the problem was solved as shown at NDSU, and that somehow when Stitt says that the defense, because of being "silent," kept the "offense off of the field" because the "offense" would have turned the ball over and lost the game and that "silence" was the key to victory whereas running an offense would have been the key to defeat.

HolyrunonsentencesBatman! That's a lot of "quotes"....I think you missed a couple.

Periods, the punctuation kind, are an unnecessary evil that get in the way of expressing true feelings. Come to think of it, so are the other kind.

 

[GrizzGriz]

And this all started with the simple question of what day the coaches' show on....

 

[grizeyes]

There was friction last season between Stitt and TG. This friction was noticeable to the players. How this impacted the players, I can't say for sure. Stitt made changes last year in an attempt to alleviate any issue. TG is no longer a coach at UM. Comments are that things are more harmonious this season for whatever reason.

He needs to stop yapping about it at every opportunity. It has nothing to do with why the offense scored "0" points in a half, THIS YEAR, although he tries to make some odd connection. It is just pointless, and he paints himself as a somewhat small-minded and vindictive individual by continual allusions to "it." There is no positive purpose to bringing it up, but he can't seem to "zip it" on the topic.

I usually do not comment on this cr@p and sh!t slinging and typically skip over most of PR's and 75's continuous blathering, but in this case 75 is right. IMO, BS is just demonstrating his lack of professionalism.