Stop_HammerTime69
Well-known member
PlayerRep said:Stop_HammerTime69 said:ari gold said:Stop_HammerTime69 said:Because he's the head coach and for the time being, its his program. This isn't a "Barry Alvarez @ Wisconsin" kind of deal where the coach needs to come in and fit the school's system. And at Montana, the program's system got the school into some hot water, so it needed to change. And like everything else in football, that kind of change can't happen overnight. It takes a few years.
Very well said. To truly get the program on the right track and on pace for long term success it was always going to take time. No coach was going to come into the UM program and immediately take it back to a perennial national title contender in their first or second season. That notion is unbelievably unrealistic, which is probably the reason we had people in the Griz fan base think that. We have awesome fans, but being unrealistic is basically a prerequisite of being a Griz fan it seems like.
We got very lucky with a string of coaches who inherited talent and had matching systems. They were given a nice car and didn't crash it. That's something only one other program can say: Ohio State. At some point, luck was going to catch up, it hit a little too hard. That "nice car" got totaled. But at least we're in a position where our worst seasons are still winning seasons. It's not the end of the world. It just takes some time to get back up.
So of course we have unrealistic fans. But just because one thing worked back then, 15-20 years ago, does not mean it will work now.
You don't seem to have much knowledge of Griz football, or football either. UM has not had a string of coaches with matching systems. Since 2000, each new coach had a different system. Pflu took over from Hauck (pro set with some power), and then moved to a version of the spread. Delaney took over the spread and then changed it back to more power, doing much of the changeover in the 2d year.
UM has never come close to being "totaled". Jeez, Delaney's last 2 seasons were 9-5 and 10-3. Not so sure that 6-5 after 8-5, is the right trend. But, I'm still on board, and think Stitt could get it going this year.
You might want to do two things.
1) check the stats. Going from Read, to Glenn, to Hauck was pretty consistent and both Glenn and Hauck were given title contenders and had systems that fit the players already there.
2) Get your story straight. Is the sky falling under Stitt? Is he a bad coach? Or are things ok and patience is the right course?
And yes, the car was totaled. Big scandal and 2012 was the first losing season in about 2 decades. Add on the scholarship reductions, and damage to the reputation, it's lucky things hadn't gotten worse. Fixing those problems takes time.