Cats2506 said:RobGriz said:Yeah, I was just not really impressed with msu's o-line. Not saying they won't get their yards if they do pass, just saying he is gonna get hit alot if they do.indian-outlaw said:If they watch the UND film they will see that they can throw. We stacked the box and pressured the crap out of that kid but he had a very quick release. DM has a similar quick release, but they will try to run the ball when they should use timing routes almost exclusively.RobGriz said:If they do, DM is going to spend more time on his back then a bobcat fans mother.
One of the differences between SAC and UM though is that SAC has good DB's and fast LB's, they can throw delayed blitzes, UM has shitty DB's and average LB's and can't cover if the blitz like that.
Its a different matchup, UM has a good DL and that will be an issue but It can be gameplaned around.
Sac actually used a lot of Drake and Chadrons game plan on D, it almost worked.
indian-outlaw said:I think they are pretty good shape QB wise for a while but I think we match up well against them. Our D will push their O-line around easy and they will have trouble scoring against the griz. If they were smart enough to drop back and throw the ball all game long they might have a shot but they will not do that. I really do think the griz beat the cats this year.KoolMoeDee said:griznation23 said:Scar fans were confident on the next QB inline. Who is this mystery person and would he be able to do what DMac was able accomplish or is this te end of sCat "ok" FB history? I hear the recruit that landed DMac has long been gone and recruiting for similar QB has never been accomplished. True or BS?
I think I understand your question, maybe. DM still has 1 more year and behind him is Jake Bleskin and Dakota Prukop.
msuhunter said:You guys are great. You prove my point for me! Nice work! :thumb:
What was your point? All you did wasmsuhunter said:You guys are great. You prove my point for me! Nice work! :thumb:
Cats2506 said:RobGriz said:Yeah, I was just not really impressed with msu's o-line. Not saying they won't get their yards if they do pass, just saying he is gonna get hit alot if they do.indian-outlaw said:If they watch the UND film they will see that they can throw. We stacked the box and pressured the crap out of that kid but he had a very quick release. DM has a similar quick release, but they will try to run the ball when they should use timing routes almost exclusively.RobGriz said:If they do, DM is going to spend more time on his back then a bobcat fans mother.
One of the differences between SAC and UM though is that SAC has good DB's and fast LB's, they can throw delayed blitzes, UM has shitty DB's and average LB's and can't cover if the blitz like that.
Its a different matchup, UM has a good DL and that will be an issue but It can be gameplaned around.
Sac actually used a lot of Drake and Chadrons game plan on D, it almost worked.
MTGrizzFan said:Cats2506 said:RobGriz said:Yeah, I was just not really impressed with msu's o-line. Not saying they won't get their yards if they do pass, just saying he is gonna get hit alot if they do.indian-outlaw said:If they watch the UND film they will see that they can throw. We stacked the box and pressured the crap out of that kid but he had a very quick release. DM has a similar quick release, but they will try to run the ball when they should use timing routes almost exclusively.
One of the differences between SAC and UM though is that SAC has good DB's and fast LB's, they can throw delayed blitzes, UM has shitty DB's and average LB's and can't cover if the blitz like that.
Its a different matchup, UM has a good DL and that will be an issue but It can be gameplaned around.
Sac actually used a lot of Drake and Chadrons game plan on D, it almost worked.
Average LB's ...... :lol: seems to me Tripp and co are pretty damn good. Don't think you guys should be very confident coming into this one.
average LB's
We've had better LB'sEverettGriz said:average LB's
OMG.
maybe so, but they ain't average. I would put our front 7 against any in the Big Sky.indian-outlaw said:We've had better LB'sEverettGriz said:average LB's
OMG.
Your DL yes, your LB's noRobGriz said:maybe so, but they ain't average. I would put our front 7 against any in the Big Sky.indian-outlaw said:We've had better LB'sEverettGriz said:average LB's
OMG.
pussycatkillerz said:Cats got lucky as f***
Refs spotted MsU 4 on a BAD blown TD call that forced a field goal...
Final should of been 21-20 sac
ok :roll:Cats2506 said:Your DL yes, your LB's noRobGriz said:maybe so, but they ain't average. I would put our front 7 against any in the Big Sky.indian-outlaw said:We've had better LB'sEverettGriz said:OMG.
OH!!! You got him there!!!!grizbrokebacker1 said:pussycatkillerz said:Cats got lucky as f***
Refs spotted MsU 4 on a BAD blown TD call that forced a field goal...
Final should of been 21-20 sac
maybe you should have (should've) paid attention in English class.
grizbrokebacker1 said:pussycatkillerz said:Cats got lucky as f***
Refs spotted MsU 4 on a BAD blown TD call that forced a field goal...
Final should of been 21-20 sac
maybe you should have (should've) paid attention in English class.
cue up the "ya but's"EverettGriz said:I'm betting those "average" LBs have the Irish Lad running for his life and chucking up prayers, just like they did last year.
Yeah, just like last year. Right?bigsky33 said:Delusional. That's all I can say. The griz are going down big time in two weeks. The Irish guy and his team will prevail big time.