• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

cats at eags

SaskGriz said:
CatsRback said:
Sacks don’t tell the whole story, we have a better turn over margin (#1 BSC). Largely due to pressure we create with our front 4 and not needing to send the kitchen sink. Some QB’s throw it away, some take sacks, some throw picks. But yes you take the fact you have more sacks to the bank.
We also have more picks than you, 13-11 so I guess I'm taking two facts to the banks. Turn over margin is a team stat not a defensive stat, because it's 50% based on what your offense does. The best D in the world can't stop it's own running back from fumbling.

If they were a really good D they could. :D :D :D
 
indian-outlaw said:
AZGrizFan said:
Keith Gilbertson went 7-16 in '03-'04
Tyrone Willingham went 11-37 from '05-'08
Steve Sarkasian went 34-29 from '09-'13

Only Chris Petersen was successful in this millenium. They've been "bad" for quite a long time...but they ARE 5-3 this year, which is saying something given where they started. :lol:
I think you meant 4-4.

Weird. Their Wiki page says Lake is 5-3. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Damn it all to hell. I mean, what kind of a world are we leaving to our children when you can't even trust Wikipedia as a source anymore??? :o :o :o
 
I am still trying to figure out how beating a 4-4 Washington team is not as impressive as losing to a 4-4 Wyoming team....#CatsRbackLogic
 
HelenaHandBasket said:
I am still trying to figure out how beating a 4-4 Washington team is not as impressive as losing to a 4-4 Wyoming team....#CatsRbackLogic
Yeah, a Washington team that is just starting to recover from us kicking their ass. They're 3-2 in the PAC and are but 7 point underdogs to #4 Oregon tomorrow. Wyoming recently got shut out.
 
AZGrizFan said:
indian-outlaw said:
I think you meant 4-4.

Weird. Their Wiki page says Lake is 5-3. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Damn it all to hell. I mean, what kind of a world are we leaving to our children when you can't even trust Wikipedia as a source anymore??? :o :o :o
Wikipedia is about as good of info as you can get. It is a peer reviewed resource. If you find an error you correct it and site a source. It's how media should be.
 
indian-outlaw said:
AZGrizFan said:
Weird. Their Wiki page says Lake is 5-3. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Damn it all to hell. I mean, what kind of a world are we leaving to our children when you can't even trust Wikipedia as a source anymore??? :o :o :o
Wikipedia is about as good of info as you can get. It is a peer reviewed resource. If you find an error you correct it and site a source. It's how media should be.
Yes, lefties love it, another media they can control. Snopes, too.
 
kemajic said:
indian-outlaw said:
Wikipedia is about as good of info as you can get. It is a peer reviewed resource. If you find an error you correct it and site a source. It's how media should be.
Yes, lefties love it, another media they can control. Snopes, too.
Lefties control? If you mean peer reviewed and sourced is lefty than true. Kind of like how educated people are always accused of being left. People that know what anecdotal means are probably lefties. Haha.
 
kemajic said:
HelenaHandBasket said:
I am still trying to figure out how beating a 4-4 Washington team is not as impressive as losing to a 4-4 Wyoming team....#CatsRbackLogic
Yeah, a Washington team that is just starting to recover from us kicking their ass. They're 3-2 in the PAC and are but 7 point underdogs to #4 Oregon tomorrow. Wyoming recently got shut out.
Helena will never acknowledge that Washington was and is a good team. Yes, we did give them an old fashioned ass kicking!
 
HelenaHandBasket said:
I am still trying to figure out how beating a 4-4 Washington team is not as impressive as losing to a 4-4 Wyoming team....#CatsRbackLogic

Wyoming wasn’t good. Cats shit the bed in that one.
 
indian-outlaw said:
kemajic said:
Yes, lefties love it, another media they can control. Snopes, too.
Lefties control? If you mean peer reviewed and sourced is lefty than true. Kind of like how educated people are always accused of being left. People that know what anecdotal means are probably lefties. Haha.
I'm pretty well educated, but I can assure you I've never been accused of being a lefty, even when I lived on the Left Coast. Oh, wait, I am left-handed.....
 
Spanky2 said:
kemajic said:
Yeah, a Washington team that is just starting to recover from us kicking their ass. They're 3-2 in the PAC and are but 7 point underdogs to #4 Oregon tomorrow. Wyoming recently got shut out.
Helena will never acknowledge that Washington was and is a good team. Yes, we did give them an old fashioned ass kicking!

I see that you missed the point.
 
kemajic said:
indian-outlaw said:
Wikipedia is about as good of info as you can get. It is a peer reviewed resource. If you find an error you correct it and site a source. It's how media should be.
Yes, lefties love it, another media they can control. Snopes, too.

How is wikipedia "leftist"? :lol:

Good god some of you baffle me. Its beyond asinine and shows a basic lack of critical thinking to randomly politicize something as innocuous as Wikipedia.
 
This ones tough to pick because both have the ability to choke, which will it be tomorrow? I kind of think cats choke on the chicken bone tho.
 
marceagfan5 said:
Eags by double digits…eastern has absolutely owned the cats over the past few decades, nothing changes tomorrow

Make it triple digits and you might just have another fan! :thumb:
 
Back
Top