I have nothing against Baby Boomers. That was simply an observation about you.
Anyways, the argument your AI slop made is really flawed. So your point is that generations who are two and three times removed from Baby Boomers and have had 40-50 less years to generate wealth, have less wealth than the Boomers? This on top of the fact that Boomers have already benefitted from the generational wealth shift from the Greatest Generation.
What are these stats going to say in 30-40 years? This has nothing to do with Boomer superiority, itās just demographics.
This is almost as funny as you trying to act like you knew how mega-cap employee tech stock awards work, because you did the (relatively minuscule) RightNow deal back when Gianforte still had hair. Simple Jack, you really know how to top yourself.