Can the BS get 6 teams in the playoffs?

[kemajic]

Davis will beat SSU and the cats will beat Eastern.

Id take that bet that neither will happen... we will see

I would bet with you. EWU had its toe-stubbing event and I would not want to play them here on out. And SacSt is just plain very good. We and NAU recently learned that the hard way.

 

[Ursa Major]

This is the craziness of a 13 team conference where teams don't play each other

This!

Perhaps the thread title should be:

Can the BSC get three of its teams in the WAC.

 

[ilovethecats]

Id take that bet that neither will happen... we will see

I would bet with you. EWU had its toe-stubbing event and I would not want to play them here on out. And SacSt is just plain very good. We and NAU recently learned that the hard way.

I love that Sac st is now VERY good. 98% of egriz not only picked you to beat them, but beat them soundly. They have one potential decent win on their resume; you guys. They did kill NAU but are we sure that NAU is tough aside from “playing at high elevation”? I mean, they lost to northern Colorado for crying out loud.

Not talking trash, but in all seriousness what makes Sac “very good” aside from beating the griz? Their win over Dixie? Their 2pt win over Idaho state?

Maybe I’m guilty of the same thing saying I think Weber is pretty good. And maybe sac is indeed super good. I just don’t see it yet.

 

[EverettGriz]

This is the craziness of a 13 team conference where teams don't play each other

This!

Perhaps the thread title should be:

Can the BSC get three of its teams in the WAC.

:clap: :clap:

 

[EverettGriz]

I would bet with you. EWU had its toe-stubbing event and I would not want to play them here on out. And SacSt is just plain very good. We and NAU recently learned that the hard way.

I love that Sac st is now VERY good. 98% of egriz not only picked you to beat them, but beat them soundly. They have one potential decent win on their resume; you guys. They did kill NAU but are we sure that NAU is tough aside from “playing at high elevation”? I mean, they lost to northern Colorado for crying out loud.

Not talking trash, but in all seriousness what makes Sac “very good” aside from beating the griz? Their win over Dixie? Their 2pt win over Idaho state?

Maybe I’m guilty of the same thing saying I think Weber is pretty good. And maybe sac is indeed super good. I just don’t see it yet.

While I understand your point and most of us did underestimate Sac, they have won 11 of their last 12 conference games and have the 2019 national coach of the year.

 

[uofmman1122]

I would bet with you. EWU had its toe-stubbing event and I would not want to play them here on out. And SacSt is just plain very good. We and NAU recently learned that the hard way.

I love that Sac st is now VERY good. 98% of egriz not only picked you to beat them, but beat them soundly. They have one potential decent win on their resume; you guys. They did kill NAU but are we sure that NAU is tough aside from “playing at high elevation”? I mean, they lost to northern Colorado for crying out loud.

Not talking trash, but in all seriousness what makes Sac “very good” aside from beating the griz? Their win over Dixie? Their 2pt win over Idaho state?

Maybe I’m guilty of the same thing saying I think Weber is pretty good. And maybe sac is indeed super good. I just don’t see it yet.

I don't think they're "super good", although I do think a lot of people underestimated them on here (which never happens, right? :roll: ). I'd have them as the 3rd Big Sky team at best right now.

They played an excellent game against us, but apart from that I haven't seen anything that tells me they're better than MSU, EWU, or WSU, and maybe not even UCD, depending on which version shows up, and yet they may very well sleepwalk to another BSC championship. I do think we could beat them if we played again with a better gameplan on offense.

 

[MontanaJack2006]

I would bet with you. EWU had its toe-stubbing event and I would not want to play them here on out. And SacSt is just plain very good. We and NAU recently learned that the hard way.

I love that Sac st is now VERY good. 98% of egriz not only picked you to beat them, but beat them soundly. They have one potential decent win on their resume; you guys. They did kill NAU but are we sure that NAU is tough aside from “playing at high elevation”? I mean, they lost to northern Colorado for crying out loud.

Not talking trash, but in all seriousness what makes Sac “very good” aside from beating the griz? Their win over Dixie? Their 2pt win over Idaho state?

Maybe I’m guilty of the same thing saying I think Weber is pretty good. And maybe sac is indeed super good. I just don’t see it yet.

We made Sac State look very good.

That said they aren't a bad little football team

 

[kemajic]

SacSt 44 points, 656 yards, 31 1st downs; NAU 0 points, 226 yards, 11 1st downs.

SacSt 28 points, 456 yards, 30 1st downs; Montana 21 points, 272 yards, 17 1st downs.

Who else in this conference does this other than maybe EWU? Nobody. SacSt is getting better every week. They will win another BSC championship. Their OL is ridiculously good. Yeah, NAU lost to UNC, but they beat Arizona and had blowout wins over ISU and SUU. Super inconsistent, I'm nervous about our game in Flagstaff. We've stubbed our toe there before. Depth required at 7000'.