Montana remaining in the fcs is like the 42 year old neurosurgeon making $2.25 million a year living in his mom’s basement because “that’s where he’s always lived”
RainierGriz said:EverettGriz said:Why?
Because this insinuates that the anti-move-uppers (such as myself) don’t want to move up because we don’t think we could hang with the big boys. We might be like some of the G5 schools and win those big games every once in a while, but my main gripe is the bowl system. Those are basically participation ribbons, no thank you…
RainierGriz said:EverettGriz said:Why?
Because this insinuates that the anti-move-uppers (such as myself) don’t want to move up because we don’t think we could hang with the big boys. We might be like some of the G5 schools and win those big games every once in a while, but my main gripe is the bowl system. Those are basically participation ribbons, no thank you…
That's the extent of your list? That makes a statement, doesn't it..... Idaho was never ready to move up but had to follow BSU, who was.futuregrizer said:I know right, just look how well Idaho did.
It's insinuated because of the many posts that whine that direction. And the idiot(s) that keeps coming up with only Idaho as a failure.RainierGriz said:EverettGriz said:Why?
Because this insinuates that the anti-move-uppers (such as myself) don’t want to move up because we don’t think we could hang with the big boys. We might be like some of the G5 schools and win those big games every once in a while, but my main gripe is the bowl system. Those are basically participation ribbons, no thank you…
The NCAA is becoming but a spectator of CFB.Gaeilge1 said:I have stated this before and believe it now more than ever.
If the Griz and bobcats, Bison and Jackrabbits and several other FCS programs do not decide to move up, the decision will, in a short period of time, be made for them!
Once the P5 conferences finish poaching, and solidify their respective conferences, they will proceed to negotiating their own separate contracts with the networks and the NCAA will lose a significant of its present TV revenue. The evidence is clear with the move of USC & UCLA out of the PAC 12.
Once that happens the consequences for everyone else, (G5, FCS), will be less than desirable.
Those teams need to position themselves in the best possible scenario now to assure they will be able to move with the rest of what we call Division I rather than being forced down to Division II status.
Spanky2 said:All teams won’t be successful when they move up. Will the Griz be successful? There isn’t a guarantee, but I believe we will in the beginning if we have Bobby Hauck as our coach. That is a question——would we have Bobby as our coach? I don’t know his position about moving up. I agree that North Dakota State has a dilemma concerning a move up destination. It would be good to see them in the Mountain West with the Griz and travel will be a concern for both schools. I like and respect your thoughts about enjoying the Griz games during and after and I would think that will be the case after a move up.
Spanky2 said:We are being stonewalled by Haslam and Bodnar. They are well aware of the need to move up, but with the athletic coffers currently full, the best action is no action. In the end they might discover that UM is left holding the bag.
mthoopsfan said:It's easier to move up in the East and Southeast... way more places to recruit.
Berkeley_Griz said:Spanky2 said:We are being stonewalled by Haslam and Bodnar. They are well aware of the need to move up, but with the athletic coffers currently full, the best action is no action. In the end they might discover that UM is left holding the bag.
Do you have any proof of how they're "holding us up?" And just as importantly, do you have any proof that any FBS conference is at all interested in us? Because if not, obviously, none of it matters. I asked you in a different thread why the MWC would currently be interested when there's a decent chance they're soon going to have Oregon State and Washington State fall into their lap, but I don't think you ever answered that question.
Spanky2 said:No, I don’t have proof for my comments on this board. If that was the case, there would be few comments posted.
Your welcome!Berkeley_Griz said:Spanky2 said:No, I don’t have proof for my comments on this board. If that was the case, there would be few comments posted.
You type with a lot of apparent certainty on some very strongly worded views. Hence my questioning. Thanks for answering honestly.