Bob Stitt new OC at UNC?

[Eriul]

Hilarious how people are STILL stitt bashing one year removed. Montana had a great offense under Stitt no matter what people say. No matter the other things, that part is at least true. He easily can be the OC for almost any of the BSC teams and it would be a step up. And yes, that includes us at Montana.

Too bad he couldn't figure out the head coach part though.

Seems as if he’s figured it out better than Hauck. Has a better win % than Hauck had this year... not gonna change next year either. You confident Haucks third year will be enough to vault him above the abysmal stitt?

Well to be honest, I am not a huge Hauck fan, but realize that Stitt left an average roster at best for anyone that would have been the head coach, himself included.

One of haucks main mottos is no excuses. People on egriz like to make them for him. I didn’t hear nearly as many making excuses for stitt his first year on reduced scholarships, completely new scheme, etc.

 

[CDAGRIZ]

Gotta love the 'splainin'! Fucking priceless.

 

[grizindabox]

Too bad he couldn't figure out the head coach part though.

Seems as if he’s figured it out better than Hauck. Has a better win % than Hauck had this year... not gonna change next year either. You confident Haucks third year will be enough to vault him above the abysmal stitt?

Well to be honest, I am not a huge Hauck fan, but realize that Stitt left an average roster at best for anyone that would have been the head coach, himself included.

One of haucks main mottos is no excuses. People on egriz like to make them for him. I didn’t hear nearly as many making excuses for stitt his first year on reduced scholarships, completely new scheme, etc.

No excuses, just the reality of it.

 

[Eriul]

Seems as if he’s figured it out better than Hauck. Has a better win % than Hauck had this year... not gonna change next year either. You confident Haucks third year will be enough to vault him above the abysmal stitt?

Well to be honest, I am not a huge Hauck fan, but realize that Stitt left an average roster at best for anyone that would have been the head coach, himself included.

One of haucks main mottos is no excuses. People on egriz like to make them for him. I didn’t hear nearly as many making excuses for stitt his first year on reduced scholarships, completely new scheme, etc.

No excuses, just the reality of it.

And the reality is that year 1 stitt was a better head coach than Hauck. Let’s let year 2 and 3 play out. I wonder what people will use as an excuse then

 

[grizindabox]

Well to be honest, I am not a huge Hauck fan, but realize that Stitt left an average roster at best for anyone that would have been the head coach, himself included.

One of haucks main mottos is no excuses. People on egriz like to make them for him. I didn’t hear nearly as many making excuses for stitt his first year on reduced scholarships, completely new scheme, etc.

No excuses, just the reality of it.

And the reality is that year 1 stitt was a better head coach than Hauck. Let’s let year 2 and 3 play out. I wonder what people will use as an excuse then

Maybe the reality is Stitt had better players year 1 than Hauck did? But this entire Stitt/Hauck pissing match is dumb as shit because there are so many variables involved.

 

[Eriul]

One of haucks main mottos is no excuses. People on egriz like to make them for him. I didn’t hear nearly as many making excuses for stitt his first year on reduced scholarships, completely new scheme, etc.

No excuses, just the reality of it.

And the reality is that year 1 stitt was a better head coach than Hauck. Let’s let year 2 and 3 play out. I wonder what people will use as an excuse then

Maybe the reality is Stitt had better players year 1 than Hauck did? But this entire Stitt/Hauck pissing match is dumb as shit because there are so many variables involved.

Sounds like another excuse.
Yah and you brought it up. Remember the other thread that you talked about stupidity on egriz and I called you hypocritical. This would be a good thread to examine and maybe think about that a bit.

 

[grizindabox]

No excuses, just the reality of it.

And the reality is that year 1 stitt was a better head coach than Hauck. Let’s let year 2 and 3 play out. I wonder what people will use as an excuse then

Maybe the reality is Stitt had better players year 1 than Hauck did? But this entire Stitt/Hauck pissing match is dumb as shit because there are so many variables involved.

Sounds like another excuse.
Yah and you brought it up. Remember the other thread that you talked about stupidity on egriz and I called you hypocritical. This would be a good thread to examine and maybe think about that a bit.

Well, I am dealing with stupidity here....so.....

 

[Eriul]

And the reality is that year 1 stitt was a better head coach than Hauck. Let’s let year 2 and 3 play out. I wonder what people will use as an excuse then

Maybe the reality is Stitt had better players year 1 than Hauck did? But this entire Stitt/Hauck pissing match is dumb as shit because there are so many variables involved.

Sounds like another excuse.
Yah and you brought it up. Remember the other thread that you talked about stupidity on egriz and I called you hypocritical. This would be a good thread to examine and maybe think about that a bit.

Well, I am dealing with stupidity here....so.....

Clearly... lol. You might want to work on your sentence structure :lol:

 

[HelenaHandBasket]

Football is a funny game, and in theory it is possible that getting a team to win 6 games can be a better coaching job than getting a team to 8 wins because so many things can be different. So to just say Stitts' 8-5 record was a better coaching job than Hauck's 6-5 record in year one may or may not be true or just a lazy attempt to ignore that other factors could be at play.

 

[Eriul]

Football is a funny game, and in theory it is possible that getting a team to win 6 games can be a better coaching job than getting a team to 8 wins because so many things can be different. So to just say Stitts' 8-5 record was a better coaching job than Hauck's 6-5 record in year one may or may not be true or just a lazy attempt to ignore that other factors could be at play.

Yup, absolutely. I agree but making excuses for the one guy who says no excuses while ignoring any for stitt is biased and quite honestly just bullshit.

Hauck is a lot like Bill Parcels in how he goes about things and Bill famously said, “you are what your record says you are.”

 

[sdk.catfish]

by grizindabox » Sun Nov 25, 2018 7:20 pm


Well, I am dealing with stupidity here....so.....

Are you sure you are really dealing with it? What does your therapist say? For many of us on this forum it doesn't appear that you are making strides to overcome it.

 

[HelenaHandBasket]

Football is a funny game, and in theory it is possible that getting a team to win 6 games can be a better coaching job than getting a team to 8 wins because so many things can be different. So to just say Stitts' 8-5 record was a better coaching job than Hauck's 6-5 record in year one may or may not be true or just a lazy attempt to ignore that other factors could be at play.

Yup, absolutely. I agree but making excuses for the one guy who says no excuses while ignoring any for stitt is biased and quite honestly just bullshit.

Hauck is a lot like Bill Parcels in how he goes about things and Bill famously said, “you are what your record says you are.”

I don't think people necessarily disagree with that, but what you are calling excuses could be actual factors on the result. We all get that results matter, but you have to evaluate each based on its individual merits.

 

[grizindabox]

by grizindabox » Sun Nov 25, 2018 7:20 pm


Well, I am dealing with stupidity here....so.....

Are you sure you are really dealing with it? What does your therapist say? For many of us on this forum it doesn't appear that you are making strides to overcome it.

Right back at ya.

 

[CDAGRIZ]

Football is a funny game, and in theory it is possible that getting a team to win 6 games can be a better coaching job than getting a team to 8 wins because so many things can be different. So to just say Stitts' 8-5 record was a better coaching job than Hauck's 6-5 record in year one may or may not be true or just a lazy attempt to ignore that other factors could be at play.

Yup, absolutely. I agree but making excuses for the one guy who says no excuses while ignoring any for stitt is biased and quite honestly just bullshit.

Hauck is a lot like Bill Parcels in how he goes about things and Bill famously said, “you are what your record says you are.”

I don't think people necessarily disagree with that, but what you are calling excuses could be actual factors on the result. We all get that results matter, but you have to evaluate each based on its individual merits.

Never having QB1 play a whole season was an excuse. Being forced to start, what, seven different QBs in 3 seasons was an excuse. Being on scholarship restrictions was an excuse. Not being able to gain a yard on 3d or 4th and 1 all year is just bad luck. With that, I'm finished with trying to find consistency in peoples' evaluation of coaches.

Have fun, everyone! I'm back on the Swaggerwagon until this time in 2020!
Go Griz . . . uh, and Fight On!

 

[PlayerRep]

Football is a funny game, and in theory it is possible that getting a team to win 6 games can be a better coaching job than getting a team to 8 wins because so many things can be different. So to just say Stitts' 8-5 record was a better coaching job than Hauck's 6-5 record in year one may or may not be true or just a lazy attempt to ignore that other factors could be at play.

Yup, absolutely. I agree but making excuses for the one guy who says no excuses while ignoring any for stitt is biased and quite honestly just bullshit.

Hauck is a lot like Bill Parcels in how he goes about things and Bill famously said, “you are what your record says you are.”

I don't think people necessarily disagree with that, but what you are calling excuses could be actual factors on the result. We all get that results matter, but you have to evaluate each based on its individual merits.

Never having QB1 play a whole season was an excuse. Being forced to start, what, seven different QBs in 3 seasons was an excuse. Being on scholarship restrictions was an excuse. Not being able to gain a yard on 3d or 4th and 1 all year is just bad luck. With that, I'm finished with trying to find consistency in peoples' evaluation of coaches.

Have fun, everyone! I'm back on the Swaggerwagon until this time in 2020!
Go Griz . . . uh, and Fight On!

Hw about Stitt's taking UM from nos.12 and 8 in the nation (with wins over Cats and playoffs), to nos.30 or 35 in nation with losses to Cats and no playoffs? Is that your idea of progress?

 

[AZGrizFan]

Yup, absolutely. I agree but making excuses for the one guy who says no excuses while ignoring any for stitt is biased and quite honestly just bullshit.

Hauck is a lot like Bill Parcels in how he goes about things and Bill famously said, “you are what your record says you are.”

I don't think people necessarily disagree with that, but what you are calling excuses could be actual factors on the result. We all get that results matter, but you have to evaluate each based on its individual merits.

Never having QB1 play a whole season was an excuse. Being forced to start, what, seven different QBs in 3 seasons was an excuse. Being on scholarship restrictions was an excuse. Not being able to gain a yard on 3d or 4th and 1 all year is just bad luck. With that, I'm finished with trying to find consistency in peoples' evaluation of coaches.

Have fun, everyone! I'm back on the Swaggerwagon until this time in 2020!
Go Griz . . . uh, and Fight On!

Hw about Stitt's taking UM from nos.12 and 8 in the nation (with wins over Cats and playoffs), to nos.30 or 35 in nation with losses to Cats and no playoffs? Is that your idea of progress?

Same record this year. No ranking. Loss to Cats. No playoffs. All with a hand picked savior and his chosen one as QB.

Great progress.

 

[PlayerRep]

I don't think people necessarily disagree with that, but what you are calling excuses could be actual factors on the result. We all get that results matter, but you have to evaluate each based on its individual merits.

Never having QB1 play a whole season was an excuse. Being forced to start, what, seven different QBs in 3 seasons was an excuse. Being on scholarship restrictions was an excuse. Not being able to gain a yard on 3d or 4th and 1 all year is just bad luck. With that, I'm finished with trying to find consistency in peoples' evaluation of coaches.

Have fun, everyone! I'm back on the Swaggerwagon until this time in 2020!
Go Griz . . . uh, and Fight On!

Hw about Stitt's taking UM from nos.12 and 8 in the nation (with wins over Cats and playoffs), to nos.30 or 35 in nation with losses to Cats and no playoffs? Is that your idea of progress?

Same record this year. No ranking. Loss to Cats. No playoffs. All with a hand picked savior and his chosen one as QB.

Great progress.

Talk to anyone close to the team and they will say there was progress.

 

[grizindabox]

I don't think people necessarily disagree with that, but what you are calling excuses could be actual factors on the result. We all get that results matter, but you have to evaluate each based on its individual merits.

Never having QB1 play a whole season was an excuse. Being forced to start, what, seven different QBs in 3 seasons was an excuse. Being on scholarship restrictions was an excuse. Not being able to gain a yard on 3d or 4th and 1 all year is just bad luck. With that, I'm finished with trying to find consistency in peoples' evaluation of coaches.

Have fun, everyone! I'm back on the Swaggerwagon until this time in 2020!
Go Griz . . . uh, and Fight On!

Hw about Stitt's taking UM from nos.12 and 8 in the nation (with wins over Cats and playoffs), to nos.30 or 35 in nation with losses to Cats and no playoffs? Is that your idea of progress?

Same record this year. No ranking. Loss to Cats. No playoffs. All with a hand picked savior and his chosen one as QB.

Great progress.

So we are comparing year 1 of this coach with year 3 of the other?

 

[CDAGRIZ]

Yup, absolutely. I agree but making excuses for the one guy who says no excuses while ignoring any for stitt is biased and quite honestly just bullshit.

Hauck is a lot like Bill Parcels in how he goes about things and Bill famously said, “you are what your record says you are.”

I don't think people necessarily disagree with that, but what you are calling excuses could be actual factors on the result. We all get that results matter, but you have to evaluate each based on its individual merits.

Never having QB1 play a whole season was an excuse. Being forced to start, what, seven different QBs in 3 seasons was an excuse. Being on scholarship restrictions was an excuse. Not being able to gain a yard on 3d or 4th and 1 all year is just bad luck. With that, I'm finished with trying to find consistency in peoples' evaluation of coaches.

Have fun, everyone! I'm back on the Swaggerwagon until this time in 2020!
Go Griz . . . uh, and Fight On!

Hw about Stitt's taking UM from nos.12 and 8 in the nation (with wins over Cats and playoffs), to nos.30 or 35 in nation with losses to Cats and no playoffs? Is that your idea of progress?

Not in the least. Stitt needed to go. Hauck did better this year. As I said above, I'm not seeking consistency of evaluation anymore. 12 months is my outside limit on postmortems. Too many changes to make a comparision that is at all relevant or logically sound at this point.

 

[Eriul]

Never having QB1 play a whole season was an excuse. Being forced to start, what, seven different QBs in 3 seasons was an excuse. Being on scholarship restrictions was an excuse. Not being able to gain a yard on 3d or 4th and 1 all year is just bad luck. With that, I'm finished with trying to find consistency in peoples' evaluation of coaches.

Have fun, everyone! I'm back on the Swaggerwagon until this time in 2020!
Go Griz . . . uh, and Fight On!

Hw about Stitt's taking UM from nos.12 and 8 in the nation (with wins over Cats and playoffs), to nos.30 or 35 in nation with losses to Cats and no playoffs? Is that your idea of progress?

Same record this year. No ranking. Loss to Cats. No playoffs. All with a hand picked savior and his chosen one as QB.

Great progress.

Talk to anyone close to the team and they will say there was progress.

I don’t mean to be a negator like many on this board but Im sure haucks guys saw progress on the team he presented day 1 to the end. I’m not sure people outside of haucks nut huggers agree when it comes to day 1 of Hauck taking over to today.

I think Hauck was equally responsible for the step back this year. People want to blame Stitt for the awful team that was left behind but don’t want to admit that Hauck got rid of some talent before he even started. I’m not saying Hauck didn’t have a tough task...but saying he did and Stitt had it made is absolutely laughable and biased