You never know, Stitt may do a bit of housecleaning to free up a few scholarships.
Griz!ron said:That is 19 WR's, if you are counting. How many does a team need on a roster?
I'd think that you would hypothedically want a full team of 23 starters each class, with the juniors filling out the two deep roster. The other three classes would be 'developing.' Of course it would never quite pans out that way. Those numbers that would make the teams 115 people! Isn't the NCAA limit 105 players ?
If you recruit 4 WR for each class then you would need 20 WR on the rosters!
grizindabox said:Griz!ron said:That is 19 WR's, if you are counting. How many does a team need on a roster?
I'd think that you would hypothedically want a full team of 23 starters each class, with the juniors filling out the two deep roster. The other three classes would be 'developing.' Of course it would never quite pans out that way. Those numbers that would make the teams 115 people! Isn't the NCAA limit 105 players ?
If you recruit 4 WR for each class then you would need 20 WR on the rosters!
When you figure on the equivalent of 63 full scholarships it is no where near feasible....schools like Oklahoma and Ohio St don't even come close to that....
Griz!ron said:grizindabox said:Griz!ron said:That is 19 WR's, if you are counting. How many does a team need on a roster?
I'd think that you would hypothedically want a full team of 23 starters each class, with the juniors filling out the two deep roster. The other three classes would be 'developing.' Of course it would never quite pans out that way. Those numbers that would make the teams 115 people! Isn't the NCAA limit 105 players ?
If you recruit 4 WR for each class then you would need 20 WR on the rosters!
When you figure on the equivalent of 63 full scholarships it is no where near feasible....schools like Oklahoma and Ohio St don't even come close to that....
My understanding is the FBS school can only offer 83 full scholarships, Whereas FCS can split the 63 into partials. I'm not saying that it is feasible to has 19-20 WR, just wondering.
grizindabox said:Griz!ron said:grizindabox said:Griz!ron said:That is 19 WR's, if you are counting. How many does a team need on a roster?
I'd think that you would hypothedically want a full team of 23 starters each class, with the juniors filling out the two deep roster. The other three classes would be 'developing.' Of course it would never quite pans out that way. Those numbers that would make the teams 115 people! Isn't the NCAA limit 105 players ?
If you recruit 4 WR for each class then you would need 20 WR on the rosters!
When you figure on the equivalent of 63 full scholarships it is no where near feasible....schools like Oklahoma and Ohio St don't even come close to that....
My understanding is the FBS school can only offer 83 full scholarships, Whereas FCS can split the 63 into partials. I'm not saying that it is feasible to has 19-20 WR, just wondering.
point is....even by splitting scholarships at the FCS level....there is no way you come anywhere close to having a full team of starters in each class.....
Griz!ron said:grizindabox said:Griz!ron said:grizindabox said:When you figure on the equivalent of 63 full scholarships it is no where near feasible....schools like Oklahoma and Ohio St don't even come close to that....
My understanding is the FBS school can only offer 83 full scholarships, Whereas FCS can split the 63 into partials. I'm not saying that it is feasible to has 19-20 WR, just wondering.
point is....even by splitting scholarships at the FCS level....there is no way you come anywhere close to having a full team of starters in each class.....
Yes, kinda my point too. Why would you need so many WR when you don't have the room in the roster?
PlayerRep said:UM needs more knowledgeable fans, especially on the internet.
CV Griz Fan said:A Large Run Stuffing DT......