Sam A. Blitz
Well-known member
IdaGriz01 said:As most of you probably know, I'm neither a sugar-coater nor a doom-and-gloom guy.Sam A. Blitz said:I think it will be EWU, MSU, and possibly UI at the top tier. WSU and SUU will take a step back. NAU could surprise, but we say that every year... UM has a ton of question marks at OL, DB, and QB, which are key positions. I see us in that 4-6 position in year 1 for Hauck. Will be pleasantly surprised if we reach the playoffs. I see us making that RTD in year 2. Snead will have a year of experience under his belt, the OL will have matured, and those young and talented WR's will be at their peak. We also have some good young talent at LB and DL that will hopefully reach their potential by then to replace the strength of our team this year. Defense will have had a good solid year of good coaching and development by then. Need to recruit the dickens out of the DB positions. I like a healthy Sandry and Robertson at safety, but we are deficient in depth overall in the secondary this year and will need to add some horses by year 2.
There's no question there will be some growing pains, but I think this team will do better than many people think ... sooner rather than later. And it's not out of the question that they will be very good. I have no hard evidence (numbers) to back up that opinion ... but I do know this: We (and I am not immune) tend to focus, and sometimes agonize, over what is wrong (we think) with the Griz. What awful weaknesses do they have?
But the reality is -- proven year after year, at all levels -- is that every team has weak spots and things that are "wrong." When we're down in the dumps about problems with the Griz, we tend to magnify the strong points of the opposition. But none of them are really the NFL Super Bowl champs (or even the FCS national champions). They too have holes to fill, problems to work out, and will inevitably suffer key injuries. Will the Griz be playoff contenders? I have no idea. But it's not like the Griz has no talent whatsoever. With some breaks in avoiding injuries, and some key talents that step up, I truly believe they can be a pretty good team ... and maybe even a damn good team.
And I know they'll be trying all the way, and ... in the end ... that's all you can really ask.
It is true that every team has has weak spots. However, having a 1st year QB and a very young and unproven OL (especially at OT) doesn't have my expectation for the offense to be very high year 1, even with the weapons we have at the skill positions. Sneed and the OL played well in the scrimmage, but it was against a D that stayed in their expected base and didn't blitz or stunt. It's difficult to know what to expect out of those positions. There are also question marks on our ability to have a reliable pass rush and of our secondary, particularly our CB's to cover. I don't see where the talent is materially upgraded in the secondary from the D that gave up a huge amount of yards passing yards.
Our seniors will be on their 3rd head coach, 3rd defensive coordinator, and 3rd offensive coordinator. You can't discount that. I'm very happy Hauck is back and am even more impressed with the staff he has assembled, but I think it will take a year to get back to the high expectations fans have.
The future is bright. We just need to be patient. Hopefully those question marks end up being steady early this year, but that would be contrary to what most programs deal with new coaching staffs with very different philosophies.