becker2117 said:alright i got ya.....i might have taken some things you said out of context, but i guess i get a little worked up this time of year and felt i had to try and defend my griz haha....so i know this is not that relevant, but did you pick any upsets in the first round..say a 13 or 12 or even 14 seed advancing?Bigdsrip said:I'll skip the quote so we don't have a page of old posts just to read the new one. Its percentages not a sure thing. I said that from my very first post on here. Its the tourney anything CAN happen, but what is LIKELY to happen? These guys do an excellent job every year with their predictions. Of course you can't measure intangibles, and that is why the rating is 87% in favor of UW as opposed to 100%.
As to your point about the comments reflecting on your team... exactly. Thats what I've been talking about this whole time, while you interpreted that as my dismissing Montana. (IE the press/layup drill) Once you step on that black and blue court conference and yearly stats means nothing. But we aren't there yet so all we have to go on is past history and how games went this year. In those terms who you played is VERY important.
Hey me too. Its sports, it gets the blood up! Oh yeah I always pick at least 2 12's to move on, regardless of match-ups. I see Louisville and Indiana as the most likely high seeds to check out early this year, with FSU thrown in there. I've pretty much just been reading up on Montana so far so I don't have that much insight to the other match-ups, but i'm sure I'll be wrong more times than not.