Recent newspaper datat about Basketball budget disparities between Big schools in Major conferences.
http://www.grizbasketball.com/?p=574" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;... figuring out the obstacles mid-majors face when taking on the nation’s elite in the NCAA tournament.
There are plenty of reasons why Montana’s basketball and football teams roam different levels of the NCAA Division I food chain. In fact, there are millions of them. To put it bluntly, money talks.
Financial figures compiled by the federal government offer some idea of the challenge that faced 13-seed Montana last Thursday in its NCAA tournament opener against 4-seed Wisconsin. (A 73-49 loss dropped the Grizzlies’ all-time NCAA tourney record to 2-10.) The bottom line, as opposed to the free-throw line, also underscores the seismic nature of the upset victories delivered by 15-seeds Lehigh and Norfolk State over 2-seeds Duke and Missouri, respectively.
Extended to football, the disparity in financial resources provides a different perspective on the bond shared by Montana, Lehigh and Norfolk State — the only teams to compete this school year in both the NCAA Division I basketball tournament and the Football Championship Subdivision playoffs.
While acknowledging that comparing schools may be misleading, let’s spin through some of the figures available at ope.ed.gov/athletics and bbstate:
– Wisconsin, back in the Sweet 16 for the third time in five years, reported spending a healthy $6.4 million on men’s basketball in 2010-11 — the most recent season for which figures are available — compared to a shade less than $1.5 million for Montana. Wisconsin reported $93 million in athletic department revenue, while Montana reported $17 million for the same period. According to rankings compiled for the 2009-10 school year, Wisconsin was 14th among the 344 Division I schools in basketball expenditures, Montana 198th.
– Lehigh, a small, academically respected college in Pennsylvania, had never won an NCAA tourney game until it shocked the blue-blooded Duke Blue Devils, a four-time national champion. The most devilish aspect of the upset? Duke spent $13.8 million on basketball in 2010-11, the highest total in the nation, while Lehigh, at $1.1 million, was 240th. Missouri, with expenses of just under $5.3 million, was beaten by a Norfolk State team that ranked 289th at $833,000. In the next round, Norfolk State, which reported $12.1 million in athletic department revenue in 2010-11, lost big to 10-times richer Florida ($123 million). The Gators, of course, benefit from highly lucrative television contracts, as do all the power-conference schools.
– This year’s Sweet 16 includes nine of the top 15 spending schools from the 2009-10 season. And even the three double-digit seeded survivors, North Carolina State, Xavier and Ohio University, qualify as “Cinderellas” in only the loosest usage. All three rank in the upper third of NCAA basketball budgets, and NC State has claimed two national championships.
– Since 1997 only two schools outside the top 150 in basketball spending have reached the Sweet 16: Cornell (2010), which doesn’t give athletic scholarships, and Davidson (2008), which had a late-blooming NBA talent in Stephen Curry. No current Big Sky member ranks higher than 193rd. Remember when Gonzaga and the Griz were comparable, say, 15 years ago? Not anymore. Gonzaga spent $5.3 million on basketball in 2009-10, which ranked 28th in the nation.