• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

All-Big Sky preseason teams podcast

CatsRback said:
EverettGriz said:
For the same reason I expect bakers to bake, doctors to doctor, coaches to coach, brewers to brew and bankers to bank.

You’re right. Some bakers bake cakes and some bake other sweets, some coaches coach football, and not softball, some brewers brew mead, ale, light vs dark beer. Some people just want to sports cast and some want to talk politics. Shame on this page for trying to force Coulter to be a “pit bull” or probe into an on going investigation.

Do you guys realize if he gets a fact wrong he could face a defamation lawsuit? Do you guys realize if a judge gets the idea he’s trying to push an agenda he could face legal consequences? Just so you all can have a laugh or sleep well at night knowing Colter gave you 20 minutes on some cross state rival DUI situation? You all are more ridiculous than I originally imagined. Maybe have his back a little. You think he’s excited to publish this? No matter how he slices it up, he’s sticking his neck out there.

Why do you think I’m not on here screaming my opinion on it? I’m not touching it with a 10-foot pole until the dust settles. You think I just love what’s going on right now?

You are a total idiot. Please stop.
 
mthoopsfan said:
CatsRback said:
You’re right. Some bakers bake cakes and some bake other sweets, some coaches coach football, and not softball, some brewers brew mead, ale, light vs dark beer. Some people just want to sports cast and some want to talk politics. Shame on this page for trying to force Coulter to be a “pit bull” or probe into an on going investigation.

Do you guys realize if he gets a fact wrong he could face a defamation lawsuit? Do you guys realize if a judge gets the idea he’s trying to push an agenda he could face legal consequences? Just so you all can have a laugh or sleep well at night knowing Colter gave you 20 minutes on some cross state rival DUI situation? You all are more ridiculous than I originally imagined. Maybe have his back a little. You think he’s excited to publish this? No matter how he slices it up, he’s sticking his neck out there.

Why do you think I’m not on here screaming my opinion on it? I’m not touching it with a 10-foot pole until the dust settles. You think I just love what’s going on right now?

You are a total idiot. Please stop.

Why? So you can get your ushy gushy article? To help you sleep at night?
 
CatsRback said:
mthoopsfan said:
You are a total idiot. Please stop.

Why? So you can get your ushy gushy article? To help you sleep at night?

I don't know why you are a total idiot. You just are. You know little about the Cats, and nothing about the Griz. Your posts are stupid and illogical. I'm thinking that, as others of said, you're just a kid posting nonsense on egriz. I am going to continue to call you an idiot.
 
CatsRback said:
EverettGriz said:
For the same reason I expect bakers to bake, doctors to doctor, coaches to coach, brewers to brew and bankers to bank.

You’re right. Some bakers bake cakes and some bake other sweets, some coaches coach football, and not softball, some brewers brew mead, ale, light vs dark beer. Some people just want to sports cast and some want to talk politics. Shame on this page for trying to force Coulter to be a “pit bull” or probe into an on going investigation.

Do you guys realize if he gets a fact wrong he could face a defamation lawsuit? Do you guys realize if a judge gets the idea he’s trying to push an agenda he could face legal consequences? Just so you all can have a laugh or sleep well at night knowing Colter gave you 20 minutes on some cross state rival DUI situation? You all are more ridiculous than I originally imagined. Maybe have his back a little. You think he’s excited to publish this? No matter how he slices it up, he’s sticking his neck out there.

Why do you think I’m not on here screaming my opinion on it? I’m not touching it with a 10-foot pole until the dust settles. You think I just love what’s going on right now?

If you fear this you have absolutely zero business being a reporter.
 
EverettGriz said:
CatsRback said:
You’re right. Some bakers bake cakes and some bake other sweets, some coaches coach football, and not softball, some brewers brew mead, ale, light vs dark beer. Some people just want to sports cast and some want to talk politics. Shame on this page for trying to force Coulter to be a “pit bull” or probe into an on going investigation.

Do you guys realize if he gets a fact wrong he could face a defamation lawsuit? Do you guys realize if a judge gets the idea he’s trying to push an agenda he could face legal consequences? Just so you all can have a laugh or sleep well at night knowing Colter gave you 20 minutes on some cross state rival DUI situation? You all are more ridiculous than I originally imagined. Maybe have his back a little. You think he’s excited to publish this? No matter how he slices it up, he’s sticking his neck out there.

Why do you think I’m not on here screaming my opinion on it? I’m not touching it with a 10-foot pole until the dust settles. You think I just love what’s going on right now?

If you fear this you have absolutely zero business being a reporter.

Well, I’m not a reporter so…
 
mthoopsfan said:
CatsRback said:
Why? So you can get your ushy gushy article? To help you sleep at night?

I don't know why you are a total idiot. You just are. You know little about the Cats, and nothing about the Griz. Your posts are stupid and illogical. I'm thinking that, as others of said, you're just a kid posting nonsense on egriz. I am going to continue to call you an idiot.

Hey man I get I’m public enemy #1…. But you’re a close second. For a Dartmouth grad you say some pretty dumb stuff PR. You even thought SDSU was in North Dakota. Even though South Dakota is in the schools name. There’s always a pot to someone’s kettle. The difference is, I’m messing around, you’re serious.
 
CatsRback said:
mthoopsfan said:
I don't know why you are a total idiot. You just are. You know little about the Cats, and nothing about the Griz. Your posts are stupid and illogical. I'm thinking that, as others of said, you're just a kid posting nonsense on egriz. I am going to continue to call you an idiot.

Hey man I get I’m public enemy #1…. But you’re a close second. For a Dartmouth grad you say some pretty dumb stuff PR. You even thought SDSU was in North Dakota. Even though South Dakota is in the schools name. There’s always a pot to someone’s kettle. The difference is, I’m messing around, you’re serious.

I never thought SDSU was in ND. You are a total idiot.

I don’t say anything dumb.
 
mthoopsfan said:
CatsRback said:
Hey man I get I’m public enemy #1…. But you’re a close second. For a Dartmouth grad you say some pretty dumb stuff PR. You even thought SDSU was in North Dakota. Even though South Dakota is in the schools name. There’s always a pot to someone’s kettle. The difference is, I’m messing around, you’re serious.

I never thought SDSU was in ND. You are a total idiot.

I don’t say anything dumb.

Locker room talk> UM is 5th best average ranked FCS team in past 3 season > page 5. Your words not mine. It’s also just another dumpster fire thread that got locked and moved. But it’s on record you calling NDSU the 2nd best team in ND. Which either you’re a total idiot for thinking SDSU is in ND. Or you are also an idiot for trying to tell us all that UND is a better football team than NDSU.
 
Griz til I die said:
CatsRback said:
Well, I’m not a reporter so…
Almost sounds like you're trying to talk Colter out of writing the story for fear of what he may actually know

Ha, would I be lying if I said I don’t mind negative press for the Bobcats? Of course.

However, my sentiments lie with the fact that this page doesn’t care about colter or his process, rather slandering the cats however they can. If that means having a writer rush to publish a tricky article at their own expense just so gris fans can have a road trip listen, who cares right?
 
CatsRback said:
Griz til I die said:
Almost sounds like you're trying to talk Colter out of writing the story for fear of what he may actually know

Ha, would I be lying if I said I don’t mind negative press for the Bobcats? Of course.

However, my sentiments lie with the fact that this page doesn’t care about colter or his process, rather slandering the cats however they can. If that means having a writer rush to publish a tricky article at their own expense just so gris fans can have a road trip listen, who cares right?

You have a very odd idea of what constitutes libel/slander.

Would asking the following question be slanderous: "Waded, why weren't the coaches accused of DUI, property damage, hit and run and destruction of evidence suspended?"

How about, "Coach, why was a raise given to coaches currently under criminal investigation?"?

Or: Mr. AD (no one knows his name): "Are you aware that there is concern in your fanbase about how this matter has been handled?"

The simple fact that NO journalist has asked those questions is astounding.
 
CatsRback said:
Shame on this page for trying to force Coulter to be a “pit bull” or probe into an on going investigation.
giphy.gif

Are you Coulter?
Both giant catzz fans.
Both want to hide this story.
Both seek validation on egriz.
 
EverettGriz said:
CatsRback said:
Ha, would I be lying if I said I don’t mind negative press for the Bobcats? Of course.

However, my sentiments lie with the fact that this page doesn’t care about colter or his process, rather slandering the cats however they can. If that means having a writer rush to publish a tricky article at their own expense just so gris fans can have a road trip listen, who cares right?

You have a very odd idea of what constitutes libel/slander.

Would asking the following question be slanderous: "Waded, why weren't the coaches accused of DUI, property damage, hit and run and destruction of evidence suspended?"

How about, "Coach, why was a raise given to coaches currently under criminal investigation?"?

Or: Mr. AD (no one knows his name): "Are you aware that there is concern in your fanbase about how this matter has been handled?"

The simple fact that NO journalist has asked those questions is astounding.

Yeah these are all great points. You seem to know a lot. You know what. I think you should write a story on it!
 
garizzalies said:
CatsRback said:
Shame on this page for trying to force Coulter to be a “pit bull” or probe into an on going investigation.
giphy.gif

Are you Coulter?
Both giant catzz fans.
Both want to hide this story.
Both seek validation on egriz.

I think you screwed your tinfoil hat a little too tight this morning.
 
https://www.instagram.com/p/Cuz0ud9vRu7/?igshid=YzcxN2Q2NzY0OA==

Could be a monster season for 55.

You may have missed in this one Nuanez.
 
EverettGriz said:
CatsRback said:
Ha, would I be lying if I said I don’t mind negative press for the Bobcats? Of course.

However, my sentiments lie with the fact that this page doesn’t care about colter or his process, rather slandering the cats however they can. If that means having a writer rush to publish a tricky article at their own expense just so gris fans can have a road trip listen, who cares right?

You have a very odd idea of what constitutes libel/slander.

Would asking the following question be slanderous: "Waded, why weren't the coaches accused of DUI, property damage, hit and run and destruction of evidence suspended?"

How about, "Coach, why was a raise given to coaches currently under criminal investigation?"?

Or: Mr. AD (no one knows his name): "Are you aware that there is concern in your fanbase about how this matter has been handled?"

The simple fact that NO journalist has asked those questions is astounding.

It’s very clear many of you have no clue how the process of weeding through bureaucracy works…how would you go about getting comment from President Cruzado? Would you just call up her cell phone? How about the AD? Just call him until he answers?

Public universities have media relations departments on campus and the athletic department. If they don’t facilitate interview requests or provide comments, there isn’t a reporter or journalist or analyst in the world that is getting them to talk.

Blame the bureaucracy of the institutions if you are so dead set in blaming something or someone.
 
Colter_Nuanez56 said:
EverettGriz said:
You have a very odd idea of what constitutes libel/slander.

Would asking the following question be slanderous: "Waded, why weren't the coaches accused of DUI, property damage, hit and run and destruction of evidence suspended?"

How about, "Coach, why was a raise given to coaches currently under criminal investigation?"?

Or: Mr. AD (no one knows his name): "Are you aware that there is concern in your fanbase about how this matter has been handled?"

The simple fact that NO journalist has asked those questions is astounding.

It’s very clear many of you have no clue how the process of weeding through bureaucracy works…how would you go about getting comment from President Cruzado? Would you just call up her cell phone? How about the AD? Just call him until he answers?

Public universities have media relations departments on campus and the athletic department. If they don’t facilitate interview requests or provide comments, there isn’t a reporter or journalist or analyst in the world that is getting them to talk.

Blame the bureaucracy of the institutions if you are so dead set in blaming something or someone.

Fair. I've never worked in media. But many of us run into similar situations in our line of work.

Personally, if I were a journalist, I would email Cruzado. If she failed to reply, I'd state in my article something along the lines of "multiple emails to President Cruzado seeking comment were not returned. Attempts to phone her were also unsuccessful". At least then everyone knows an effort was made and that msu is clearly trying to bury the story.

If I got a non-response response from the media relations people, I would quote them in full to show that an effort was made but I'm being stonewalled by the bureaucracy at msu, who is clearly tyring to bury the story.

The result is the same: msu is trying to hide and bury the story, and everyone then understands that. But simply not making the effort because you know bureaucracy is involved seems shortsighted. As an example, you know at a Hauck press conference he's not going to answer all of your questions, but you ask them anyway, because they need to be asked. This scenario seems no different.
 
Back
Top