• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

#4 seed Pittsburgh versus #13 Montana

I actually like this #13 team. One of the reasons they are a 13 is because of last years performance.

Wasn't MM injured for a large part of last season? I don't think she was anywhere near as healthy as she is now for that Vandy game. That is #1.

# 2: It is in Seattle. We will be the home team for this game. Not like last year in the dreary southwest. Pitt is a good team but they aren't used to playing in the northwest. I don't see a blowout by them.

#3: Better down the middle for the Griz this year. Case in point SE.

#4: We didn't make many 3's last year. That could change.

#5: The travel factor. All that airplane stuff wears me out. I'm sure it will wear them down too.

just my two cents.
 
jtgriz said:
citygriz said:
never has a program as successful as montana's made fewer curtain calls on the n.c.a.a. national stage. we haven't won a game since 1995 (san diego state) and we haven't really produced a major upset since the shannon cate era (at wisconsin 1992). we've come close several times (at stanford, 1994; v. texas tech 1997, and and at home against louisiana tech 2004) but those near-misses pale in comparison to the blow-outs: vandy last year; vandy 2005; georgia 2000; florida 1998; north carolina state 1996. nor have we won a w.n.i.t. game, losing most recently to utah and wyoming.

i think robin selvig has a nice reputation among his national peers as an excellent coach who has dominated a minor conference, but not a coach who is any threat to win an n.c.a.a. game. and i don't doubt this sort of thinking was conveniently conveyed to joslyn tinkle during her recruitment at stanford: look if you want to stay at home and dominate the big sky, fine, but if you want to play on the national stage, montana is not where you need to be.

every year about this time i get my hopes up, and every year get slammed back to reality by bigger better-shooting teams with much quicker guards. montana had a chance once to step forward and be a national player, but that chance is long-gone.

pittsburgh by so much i just hope we won't be embarrassed yet again.

I do have to say "well written citygriz", indeed a taste of reality. I had picked us as a 14 seed so am "suprised" by seed.

I do, however, respect what the Lady Griz program has done and appreciate what they mean to the community. We are always two players short of being a top 16 team, but hope, sometime, that I am proven wrong.

The Lady Griz are the one (tiny) bright spot in BSC basketball, and I'd like to disagree with these posts -- but I can't. The LG play really good team BB, but compared to the better women's programs, they lack team speed and quickness (not exactly the same thing) and a truly dominant player.

Still, if Pittsburgh reads the press/blogs and takes the Lady Griz lightly, the MT team defense could cause problems and produce an upset ... at least a glimmer of hope.

And, WTH, Portland State men get to play in Boise -- practically a home game too -- so maybe they could conjure up a miracle. (Pay no attention to the fact that they play the 276th, or close, strength of schedule.)
 
citygriz said:
i think robin selvig has a nice reputation among his national peers as an excellent coach who has dominated a minor conference, but not a coach who is any threat to win an n.c.a.a. game. and i don't doubt this sort of thinking was conveniently conveyed to joslyn tinkle during her recruitment at stanford:

Yeah. And then there's the fact that its freaking Stanford and her starting pay after college will likely be more than a comparable graduate from UM will command after a decade in the working world. I think Stanford sells itself without kicking sand in the face of the UM women's basketball coach.
 
IdaGriz01 said:
And, WTH, Portland State men get to play in Boise -- practically a home game too -- so maybe they could conjure up a miracle. (Pay no attention to the fact that they play the 276th, or close, strength of schedule.)

Portland State men also had by far the most impressive win of any Big Sky team this year - winning at Gonzaga. They also lost at Washington by 1.
 
I really hope that we can at least stay close with them and not have a blowout like last year.

Also I noticed this on ESPN's live chat with women's basketball writer, Graham Hays:
kyle Great Falls Montana: what are your thoughts on the Pitt/Montana matchup. Anychance lagy griz pull off an upset?

Graham Hays: (8:32 PM ET ) That's probably at the top of my list for potential upsets. I worry about Montana containing Pepper Wilson, who is huge in the post and really played well in the Big East tournament. And obviously, not many people contain Shavonte Zealous. But Montana has a great backcourt of its own and set itself up for this with some good nonconference games. Plus, while it's not necessarily right around the corner, Seattle is a much easier trip from Missoula than Pittsburgh.
 
GMBand37 said:
I really hope that we can at least stay close with them and not have a blowout like last year.

Also I noticed this on ESPN's live chat with women's basketball writer, Graham Hays:
kyle Great Falls Montana: what are your thoughts on the Pitt/Montana matchup. Anychance lagy griz pull off an upset?

Graham Hays: (8:32 PM ET ) That's probably at the top of my list for potential upsets. I worry about Montana containing Pepper Wilson, who is huge in the post and really played well in the Big East tournament. And obviously, not many people contain Shavonte Zealous. But Montana has a great backcourt of its own and set itself up for this with some good nonconference games. Plus, while it's not necessarily right around the corner, Seattle is a much easier trip from Missoula than Pittsburgh.

Here's to flight delays!!!
 
jtgriz said:
GMBand37 said:
I really hope that we can at least stay close with them and not have a blowout like last year.

Also I noticed this on ESPN's live chat with women's basketball writer, Graham Hays:

Here's to flight delays!!!

I am thinking they will be coming over to seattle a day or two early. don't think flight delays are going to make that big of an effect.
Hopefully, Lady Griz can fly over and not bus over.
 
griz4life said:
citygriz said:
i think robin selvig has a nice reputation among his national peers as an excellent coach who has dominated a minor conference, but not a coach who is any threat to win an n.c.a.a. game. and i don't doubt this sort of thinking was conveniently conveyed to joslyn tinkle during her recruitment at stanford:

Yeah. And then there's the fact that its freaking Stanford and her starting pay after college will likely be more than a comparable graduate from UM will command after a decade in the working world. I think Stanford sells itself without kicking sand in the face of the UM women's basketball coach.
Actually, being a Stanford "grad" I can say thanks to people like yourself that might be true. But, lets see what the real stats, are.....undergrads at Stanford who do not go on to advanced programs might actually earn less than the counterpart at UM....It is the Grad programs at Stanford that shine.....and the athletic programs that are funded extremely well......you can do that with billions in your endowment.....Now, just what your post has to do with the Lady Griz playing Pittsburgh, I don't get...but I give the slow and ponderous Lady Griz a good chance for an upset this year if Brittany Lohmann plays better than she did this week end, and Ena remains as quick and talented as anyone on the Pitt team...Morales doesn't strike me as a great player, more than a good player in a bad league...she is very slow but can hit if she has the time.....still, she now has that Ena girl to help out....very impressive player...Go, Lady Griz! This one is winnable....
 
GrizBBIsKing said:
jtgriz said:
Here's to flight delays!!!

I am thinking they will be coming over to seattle a day or two early. don't think flight delays are going to make that big of an effect.
Hopefully, Lady Griz can fly over and not bus over.

I mean mind altering eight hour delays
 
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncw/ncaatourney09/news/story?id=3985171

One of the "experts" has Montana as the possible cinderella. Lets hope he is right!
 
Another quote by Graham Hays

Barb (Tulsa): Which team could be this year's Marist if it's not Marist?

Graham Hays: After watching the Montana-Portland State game Saturday, I think the Big Sky could be the place to look. Assuming either of those teams wins the conference tournament in Missoula (six teams, not four, as I mistakenly blogged last week), I wouldn't want to draw them. That's especially true for Montana. Watching that game, size, and not skill, was about the only thing separating it from what I was seeing in person at the Big East.
 
How do you set up to defend Pitt? With Zellous a three-time All Big East player, they obviously have a scorer, and passer, too. And 6-6 Pepper Wilson in the middle -- a threat as an offensive rebounder as well as playing the post.

Maybe better to start out zone than man to man ... give some help in the middle against the 6-6 freshman. Can 6-1 Lohman give away 5 inches?

How do you try to contain 22 points a game Zellous, who apparently draws a lot of fouls and makes a lot of free throws? Does starting with a zone help here, too?

The zone also could help get you better position on the defensive boards.

On the offensive side, expect Pitt's best defender to be on Mandy -- and maybe Mandy goes inside to post up. So Rogers would get the second-best defender, probably Zellous.

Wouldn't be surprised to see box and one on Mandy...

Two thoughts: Once again, Sarah Ena is going to have to play out of her mind on the boards and defensively... And maybe it would be worth a little time for Guardipee to play early and physically against the 6-6 post-- bang her around for as much as two fouls before changing up the defense.
 
I see Pittsburgh getting their buckets no matter what Montana does. So the Lady Griz are gonna have to knock down shots and a lot of them. Limit turnovers. Shoot lights out. Maybe hope Pitt gets into some foul trouble. Either way its always nice to watch Montana basketball in the tournament.
 
The zone also could help get you better position on the defensive boards.





Like the zone idea but not for rebounding as it is always harder to rebound out of a zone. Especially against a much bigger and more athletic team.
 
Davidia versus Goliath: that's why they play the game. The 3-ball is the great equalizer. I hope Pitt thinks they're the only team on a national stage. They just might fall off.
 
GrizLA said:
griz4life said:
Yeah. And then there's the fact that it's freaking Stanford and her starting pay after college will likely be more than a comparable graduate from UM will command after a decade in the working world. I think Stanford sells itself without kicking sand in the face of the UM women's basketball coach.
Actually, being a Stanford "grad" I can say thanks to people like yourself that might be true. But, lets see what the real stats, are.....undergrads at Stanford who do not go on to advanced programs might actually earn less than the counterpart at UM....It is the Grad programs at Stanford that shine.....and the athletic programs that are funded extremely well......you can do that with billions in your endowment.....Now, just what your post has to do with the Lady Griz playing Pittsburgh, I don't get...but I give the slow and ponderous Lady Griz a good chance for an upset this year if Brittany Lohmann plays better than she did this week end, and Ena remains as quick and talented as anyone on the Pitt team...Morales doesn't strike me as a great player, more than a good player in a bad league...she is very slow but can hit if she has the time.....still, she now has that Ena girl to help out....very impressive player...Go, Lady Griz! This one is winnable....

OK, pal. I'm ready for some real stats. Let it rip when you find some. And learn how to spell and punctuate, which might make your bogus Stanford story more plausible.
Here's a few tips:
Weekend is one word. In a sentence, you might say you spent the weekend on eGriz pretending you were a Stanford graduate.
Let's is the proper conjunction of let us. Using lets where let's is needed makes you look like a dope.
Yourself is a reflexive pronoun. It shouldn't be used when trying to establish your superiority with a well-aimed dig like "I can say thanks to people like yourself that might be true." Thanks to people like you, I can always find a dope on eGriz pretending to be something he's not.
Ellipses come in threes, not fours. They're used when you're quoting material and want to omit part of the quote. If you want to omit part of your own posting, there's no need to use ellipses. Stop typing or use the backspace key.
A learned person knows that it's bad form to quote one's own self. Quotes indicate a writer is speaking or writing another's words.
For example, if I cited your use of the term "grad," I would put it in quotations to indicate it was yours. If the word had not been previously introduced by someone else in the dialogue stream and I was introducing it, then putting it in quotes would be stupid.
Also, the first word at the beginning of a sentence always begins with an uppercase letter. Lowercase words in the remainder of the sentence unless they are proper nouns. You shouldn't capitalize the first letter in the word "grad" if it's in the middle of a sentence, even if you're talking about a Stanford grad.
I know the tips I'm giving you aren't college material. Most of this stuff is delivered to students by seventh grade. However, I know if you don't have a firm grasp on simple spelling and punctuation, your application to Stanford will be tossed in the trash.

If my daughter had offers to play basketball from Stanford and Montana, I would urge her to select the Stanford offer, even if I was a Montana coach. I wouldn't have to denigrate coach Selvig to make my case.
 
wow, the new york times style book! memories of "j" school!

lighten up, griz4life. the worst speller on this board is arguably its most informative--mslacat. a young woman who is very close to me also makes the list of the the world's worst spellers, and yet manages to hold down a high-paying job--as head of breast cancer research at new york presbyterian hospital. i don't question for one second that grizla went to stanford, and i've long since forgiven people their grammatical and spelling mistakes simply because i have found so many of them to be so much more interesting than all those anal-midwestern listmakers and self-righteous fussbutt grammarians such as yourself.
 
I don't think it's the NY Times style book -- "Winners and Sinners" was more demanding than that -- and surely not even the AP style book. It's just called good English (and there was a little book you could use for reference, if you needed.) I think it's ok for "fussbutt grammarians" to deliver a message if there are those who are self-impressed.

When did it become wrong to use good English?

Culture wars. Politically correct. Don't make anyone feel bad just because they don't know how to use their own language.

And so it goes.
 
Back
Top