• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

3 Griz Arrested

Status
Not open for further replies.
CDAGRIZ said:
bgbigdog said:
CDAGRIZ said:
I honestly don't mean to be "that guy," but we don't know if they are guilty, do we? If I missed that somewhere, I apologize.

Do we honestly know anything other than they were arrested & charged? Lots of speculation, but little else until their hearing tomorrow.

No, we don't. Have they even been charged?
They had to have been charged in order to have been arrested. So yes they have been charged just not found guilty… except in comment sections.
 
Fahque said:
CDAGRIZ said:
bgbigdog said:
CDAGRIZ said:
I honestly don't mean to be "that guy," but we don't know if they are guilty, do we? If I missed that somewhere, I apologize.

Do we honestly know anything other than they were arrested & charged? Lots of speculation, but little else until their hearing tomorrow.

No, we don't. Have they even been charged?
They had to have been charged in order to have been arrested. So yes they have been charged just not found guilty… except in comment sections.

Haha! Good point.
 
CDAGRIZ said:
Fushiznitz said:
This situation is a lot like masturbating on an airplane being illegal. Therefore, it's "Thanks a lot, Bin Laden".

Wait, that's illegal?
Technically, only "smoking" is prohibited in the lavatories. Well, that's what they say ...
 
Fahque said:
CDAGRIZ said:
bgbigdog said:
CDAGRIZ said:
I honestly don't mean to be "that guy," but we don't know if they are guilty, do we? If I missed that somewhere, I apologize.

Do we honestly know anything other than they were arrested & charged? Lots of speculation, but little else until their hearing tomorrow.

No, we don't. Have they even been charged?
They had to have been charged in order to have been arrested. So yes they have been charged just not found guilty… except in comment sections.
nope......they may have been charged already, but you do not have to be charged to be arrested. Prosecutors determine the charge and whether the "arrested" will be charged.
 
GrizWhiz said:
Fahque said:
CDAGRIZ said:
bgbigdog said:
Do we honestly know anything other than they were arrested & charged? Lots of speculation, but little else until their hearing tomorrow.

No, we don't. Have they even been charged?
They had to have been charged in order to have been arrested. So yes they have been charged just not found guilty… except in comment sections.
nope......they may have been charged already, but you do not have to be charged to be arrested. Prosecutors determine the charge and whether the "arrested" will be charged.

That's what I thought. I didn't know if ADAs were ripping a shift on a Sunday, but wasn't sure.
 
More facts found here; http://www.montanakaimin.com/news/article_627dd83a-80cd-11e5-9c4d-cfe8c02a41b9.html
 
Interesting read. Doesn't sound like the homeowner is overly upset. Also, with nothing taken and nothing vandalized, I doubt anyone will end up with any kind of felony or jail time. Never-the-less, I highly doubt any of them play for the Griz again this season. But, if someone wants to post the exact student-athlete conduct code again, more power to them. I feel like I've just read that damn thing too many times.
 
Good to see the eGriz justice system is alive and well. Not even a "guilty until proven innocent" mindset here, just a "Guilty!" mindset while knowing only what was reported in the Missoulian. Remember how that all turned out for JJ?

I'm not saying these guys didn't do it but FFS people maybe we should wait until more facts are known instead of just jumping to guilty verdicts, throw them off the team, etc etc based on what appeared in the Missoulian and is on twitter.

The athletic department thankfully is handling this the correct way in suspending them while the process plays out. Ya know...not immediately jumping to conclusions & wanting them booted immediately.

Or we can just forget the whole "innocent until proven guilty" thing in the U.S. justice system and continue making asses out of ourselves without any info on the situation.

Inspector Griz said:
Boot em I say no need to hear there side of the story.

Yeah, who cares about actual justice. If they are accused of something then they MUST have done it! Thanks for stopping by Khamenei.

Now...if I could just figure out which one of you is Kim Jong-Un, King Salman and the other leaders of countries where people are guilty immediately... hmm....

It is kind of interesting many of you guys want immediate action before the legal process plays out exactly like Engstrom did in the JJ case...yet many of you same posters dislike Engstrom for doing that. Huh...
 
Potomac Griz said:
Good to see the eGriz justice system is alive and well. Not even a "guilty until proven innocent" mindset here, just a "Guilty!" mindset while knowing only what was reported in the Missoulian. Remember how that all turned out for JJ?

I'm not saying these guys didn't do it but FFS people maybe we should wait until more facts are known instead of just jumping to guilty verdicts, throw them off the team, etc etc based on what appeared in the Missoulian and is on twitter.

The athletic department thankfully is handling this the correct way in suspending them while the process plays out. Ya know...not immediately jumping to conclusions & wanting them booted immediately.

Or we can just forget the whole "innocent until proven guilty" thing in the U.S. justice system and continue making asses out of ourselves without any info on the situation.

Inspector Griz said:
Boot em I say no need to hear there side of the story.

Yeah, who cares about actual justice. If they are accused of something then they MUST have done it! Thanks for stopping by Khamenei.

Now...if I could just figure out which one of you is Kim Jong-Un, King Salman and the other leaders of countries where people are guilty immediately... hmm....

It is kind of interesting many of you guys want immediate action before the legal process plays out exactly like Engstrom did in the JJ case...yet many of you same posters dislike Engstrom for doing that. Huh...
:thumb:
 
BWahlberg said:
More facts found here; http://www.montanakaimin.com/news/article_627dd83a-80cd-11e5-9c4d-cfe8c02a41b9.html
Sounds like they're lucky they didn't enter a trigger happy residence.
 
Thought all of em would have been dead tired, wet and cold and ready to rest.

Guilty or not, there is no fixing stupid!
 
Not jumping to any conclusions. But having a great deal of difficulty understanding why you would enter any house, occupied or not, that is not your house. Having to use a ladder to make that entry certainly speaks to the difficulty it takes to make the entry. Hard to say you stumbled into the house in a drunken stupor.

Very disappointing. Can't wait to hear the explanation. I guess they could have thought it was a haunted house.....yeah, I would go with that one.
 
This just pisses me off... all good kids for the most part and this is proof that sometimes stupidity prevails. Curious as to how and why this went down. Guess we'll know more on Monday evening.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top