Fahque said:
Edwards > Miller during their years here.
Just curious, how was Edwards a better QB than Miller?
Miller is in the NCAA record books several times as one of the best QBs in FCS history. If you look at QB efficiency rating his career efficiency rating is only 5.8 points behind DD and gets him #5 in FCS history for that rating.
#1 in FCS in Efficiency Rating in 1999. 240-368 (65.2%), 3,461yds, 32tds, 8ints, 168.6 rating.
#5 in FCS history for Career Efficiency. 430-654 (65.7%), 5,900yds, 46tds, 14ints, 160.5 rating
#6 in FCS history for Career Yards per game with 327.8 per game. (Ahead oF DD)
#22 in FCS history for Season yards per game with 346.1 in 1999.
If I remember right Edwards was usually hovering around the 125-135 QB rating level, under 60% completion percentages, not the most amazing TD to INT ratio and with Bradon Neill (the backup) actually having a far better rating. Not even close to on the same level as Drew Miller in my opinion...Keep in mind I'm not saying Edwards wasn't a good QB.
In the year where there was some odd QB controversy (where people in our section actually cheered when Miller got hurt since it meant Edwards was coming in) even with Miller being banged up it still wasn't even close.
2000 Edwards:
8 games, 76-140 (54.29%), 1004yds, 9tds, 4ints. (130.03 efficiency rating)
2000 Miller:
8 games, 190-286 (66.43%), 2439yds, 14tds, 6ints (150.03 efficiency rating)
Never really understood why some people thought Edwards was a far superior QB to Miller, so I'm curious to hear your opinion.