• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Age based rule to be implemented

I don't understand how these measurements work, but why would a recruit coming in January make any difference? He gets 5 seasons. Fall 1 through fall 5. I assume that isn't measured Aug 1 of year 1 to Dec. 31/Jan 10 of year 5? January enrollment in year 1 wouldn't impact that, would it? Feel free to explain this to me. I don't pretend to understand this. Thx.
For example, his eligibility clock can begin 8/1 and he would get the next 5 seasons. If he postpones enrollment until January, his clock begins 1/1 and he would get the next 5 seasons (skipping the previous fall season that would count if he enrolls 8/1).
 
For example, his eligibility clock can begin 8/1 and he would get the next 5 seasons. If he postpones enrollment until January, his clock begins 1/1 and he would get the next 5 seasons (skipping the previous fall season that would count if he enrolls 8/1).
No this is not correct. We're talking about early enrolling. Kids graduating mid year and starting school in January instead of graduating in May and getting to college in June or July for summer workouts.

Because eligibility goes by the sport season, this allows the kids to get ahead and see the field sooner and be successful sooner. Very standard practice in FBS football, Montana State does it, I know the Dakota schools do it as well. Griz do it when circumstance calls for it, from what I am told, but otherwise don't encourage kids to do it. But they won't say no to a kid coming early either.
 
No this is not correct. We're talking about early enrolling. Kids graduating mid year and starting school in January instead of graduating in May and getting to college in June or July for summer workouts.

Because eligibility goes by the sport season, this allows the kids to get ahead and see the field sooner and be successful sooner. Very standard practice in FBS football, Montana State does it, I know the Dakota schools do it as well. Griz do it when circumstance calls for it, from what I am told, but otherwise don't encourage kids to do it. But they won't say no to a kid coming early either.
Both early and late can be used, but early enrollment is limited possibly by actual finances (real dollars) because they are still on the hook for players that have used up their eligibility for the remainder of the academic year.
 
Okay, fine. I first used a computer in fall of 1968. And took 2 computer courses during college. And still know nothing about them. Ha. Yes, AI doesn't do some of the things you mentioned in your 2 posts, but neither does any technology, including computers and cell phones.

What next big thing technologies, like really big things, didn't pan out?

I'm totally convinced that AI is incredibly huge and useful, even if it can't or won't do everything some people say. It's truly amazing for the smaller things I use it for. Like researching, summarizing and writing. It's incredibly useful in many legal things. It even comes up with some legal ideas that had never occurred to me. It's far more accurate than virtually anything else, even though it is far from perfect. And it is incredibly fast. I don't use it for things like who's the best football team or anything like that, or anything that is an opinion. At this point, those uses would be silly.

"When were computers first used at dartmouth


The introduction of computing at Dartmouth unfolded in a few distinct, history-making milestones:

1. The Pre-Electronic Milestone (1940)​

The very first intersection of Dartmouth and digital computing occurred in September 1940 in McNutt Hall. Research mathematician George Stibitz (working with Bell Telephone Laboratories) used a standard telephone line and a teletype console on campus to remotely access an automatic calculator mainframe in New York City. This was the world's first demonstration of remote access computing.

The Koppelman Group+ 1

2.​

Dartmouth acquired its first physical, on-campus computer in 1959—a rudimentary, desk-sized LGP-30. It was a magnetic-drum memory machine that gave a small group of undergraduate students and faculty their very first hands-on programming experience.

Wikipedia+ 1

3. The Digital Revolution (1964)​


Dartmouth

The watershed year for Dartmouth computing was 1964. Professors John Kemeny and Thomas Kurtz [I took courses, some math, from both of them]—believing that exposure to computing was as essential to a liberal arts education as using the library—secured a National Science Foundation grant to bring a massive General Electric GE-225 mainframe to campus.

Dartmouth

Working with a team of brilliant undergraduate "sysprogs" (systems programmers) in the basement of College Hall (now Collis), they created the Dartmouth Time-Sharing System (DTSS) and the BASIC programming language. At 4:00 AM on May 1, 1964, the system successfully ran its first simultaneous programs, effectively inventing accessible, personal computing and democratizing technology for students of all disciplines.

Dartmouth"

Gemini.

Basic from Dartmouth was what Gates used to build Microsoft.

"
In fact, BASIC is the literal foundation upon which Microsoft was built.

The evolution from Dartmouth BASIC to the software empire we know today is one of the most famous straight lines in tech history. Here is how it happened:

The Missing Link: Altair BASIC (1975)​

In January 1975, the MITS Altair 8800 appeared on the cover of Popular Electronics, sparking the microcomputer revolution. However, the machine shipped without software or an accessible operating system.

Seeing an opportunity, Bill Gates and Paul Allen realized that if they could adapt the easy-to-use BASIC language to run on the Altair's tiny Intel 8080 microprocessor, they would have a viable commercial product. Working around the clock at Harvard, they wrote an interpreter.

When they successfully loaded their code into the Altair via paper tape, it worked perfectly. That interpreter, Altair BASIC, became the very first product of a brand-new company they initially called "Micro-Soft."

The Separation from Dartmouth's Vision​

While Gates and Allen used the core syntax, logic, and user-friendly spirit of Dartmouth BASIC, their commercial versions began to diverge structurally:

  • The Business Model: Professors Kemeny and Kurtz intentionally kept Dartmouth BASIC in the public domain, wanting it to be a free educational tool for the world. Gates took the opposite approach, famously writing an "Open Letter to Hobbyists" in 1976, demanding that software developers be paid for their intellectual property.
  • Technical Adapation: Microsoft had to strip down Dartmouth's version to fit into incredibly tight memory constraints (initially just 4 KB of RAM).

The Evolution into Windows (GW-BASIC & Visual Basic)​

Microsoft didn't just use BASIC to get started; they rode it for decades. As personal computers grew, Microsoft evolved the language through several massive iterations:

  • MBASIC & IBM BASIC (Late 1970s/1980s): Microsoft licensed versions of BASIC to nearly every early computer manufacturer, including Apple, Commodore, and eventually IBM for the original IBM PC.
  • GW-BASIC & QBasic (1980s/1990s): This became bundled directly with MS-DOS. For a generation of Gen-X and Millennial programmers, this was their introduction to coding.
  • Visual Basic (1991): This was a massive paradigm shift. Microsoft transformed BASIC into a drag-and-drop, graphical user interface (GUI) tool. It allowed developers to rapidly build full-fledged Windows applications visually, handling the backend code automatically.
  • VB.NET (2002–Present): Microsoft fully integrated the language into their modern object-oriented .NETframework, ensuring it lived on into the enterprise software era.
Without Kemeny and Kurtz's breakthrough in Hanover, the software landscape—and Microsoft itself—would have looked entirely different." Gemini.
google glass was going to make smart phones obsolete, virtual reality was going to replace the way we use the internet, microarrays were going to revolutionize genetics and genetic research, nano particles and drug delivery were going to revolutionize health care, optogenetics was going to revolutionize brain research, etc etc... there's a lot more money being tossed at ai than those, obviously. but a lot of things don't work out the way they were predicted. crypto was supposed to replace the way basic purchases and money exchanges are made, but using it like 'digital cash' hasn't proven viable. even apple pay and google wallet haven't been adopted to the level they were predicted - credit cards are still used a lot more in the u.s. and most of the world. none of these examples mean ai won't fundamentally change the world, but a bit of skepticism about some of the claims made about it doesn't seem like a bad thing.
 
Okay, go for it. Try. I will bet against you. I agree that one has to be careful with prompts.
Lol, it took TWO prompts! Here's the copy/paste:

The Re-Evaluated Verdict​

With your clarifications, the outcome flips from a comfortable high school win to an absolute dogfight.

If this specific, soccer-savvy Griz squad plays a high school state champ:

  • The Strategy: The Griz would likely play a hyper-aggressive, physical, and fast-paced game. They would use their endurance to press the high schoolers high up the pitch, forcing turnovers before the kids could establish their passing rhythm.
  • The X-Factor: The Griz kickers taking set pieces (corners and free kicks) would be lethal. Any foul given up by the high schoolers within 35 yards of the goal would essentially be a penalty kick given the leg strength of D1 specialists.
Final Prediction: The Griz football "Soccer Sub-Squad" wins a grueling, highly physical match 2-1 or 3-2, largely decided by a physical mismatch on a corner kick or a set-piece goal from a D1 kicker. Your point stands—with the right roster filters, elite college athleticism combined with a baseline soccer IQ is just too much for 16 and 17-year-olds to overcome."
 
Back
Top