• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Lamson > Ay Yat

My neighbor and I had this debate yesterday. The numbers don’t stack up to support his argument. Lamson is very good, but is he really better than Ah Yat? I don’t think he is. Two different systems and Ah Yat was very disciplined with not trying to do too much last year with his feet. Lamson was 15th in the conference for rushing yards and the Cats had three players in the top 15. Lamson also had a better defensive squad to help him out in my opinion. He is poised and a good leader. So is Ah Yat and this is probably the year he really comes into his own. BSC stats show two pretty evenly matched QB’s. Interceptions were understandably higher for Ah Yat given he aired quite a bit more. 470 attempts vs. 356. Lamson has the hardware and Ah Yat has plenty of motivation. Going to be great battles to watch this season.
Ah Yat is a better player, but when it's all said and done, Lamson will have had the greater career.
 
And the team won a national championship.
They did fine in 2001 but you could make an argument that Johnny Montana fell apart at the end of the 2002 season. It could be that Joe G was already on his way out and any qb would have struggled though. John Edwards last game he threw something like 37% completion which isn’t great.
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Back
Top