• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

2027 Montana Recruiting (10) Verbals & (55) Offers

BDizzle said:
Lane really liked his visit. Visiting the cats next week. And still has two FBS visits. But family was impressed with Missoula.
Click to expand...
His momma was quite the stud athlete for Butte High and then MT Western back in the day, track and volleyball. I believe his dad played football at Western too.
 
nicktaber58 said:
Riiiiiiiight. Womp.
Click to expand...
There is no college football roster full of "high level" college players. Pretty sure I not once mentioned you don't recruit high school kids without them being high level high school athletes with high level character and high level high school talent. I would guess all 13 offers to Montana high school kids hit on high level athlete, high level character, high level talent yet AZ thinks a majority should be PWO. Does that not at the very least make them capable players, which are the glue of every college team? Should capable players automatically be assumed as PWO?
 
grizfnz said:
According to those fans of the west Dakota school, if a player is from your backyard (Missoula/Flathead), a UM legacy or family are pro-GRIZ, signing them isn’t really a recruiting win. Definitely a change in the narrative since February.
Click to expand...
West Dakota got lucky on the odd dynamics that led to them getting a few missoula kids, and BH having a midlife crisis and forgetting what made him successful in the first place around here... now weve got a coach thats *simply trying* with in state kids, and the tides are changing. LFG 💪💪💪
 
HelenaHandBasket said:
There is no college football roster full of "high level" college players. Pretty sure I not once mentioned you don't recruit high school kids without them being high level high school athletes with high level character and high level high school talent. I would guess all 13 offers to Montana high school kids hit on high level athlete, high level character, high level talent yet AZ thinks a majority should be PWO. Does that not at the very least make them capable players, which are the glue of every college team? Should capable players automatically be assumed as PWO?
Click to expand...
Show me where I said the majority should be PWO. I never said that.

I asked if there were 13 MT kids who are capable of playing at the high level demanded by a championship calibre football team....or...or...were the other offers out there PWO's who maybe have some development to do prior to getting $$ or even making the team...It was a QUESTION. Not a statement.

For a guy who has completely misrepresented what I ACTUALLY said, you want to parse words more than anybody I've ever seen.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top