• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Clarifying my position - they are kinda growing on me.

No, not the one you morphed to when he put holes in the one you started. Keep up.
This is why I jumped on the “frustration” excuse. Read it.


Lazy take. You are confusing frustration with entitlement. Zoomers are entering adulthood with higher housing costs, higher tuition, more debt, and less job security than previous generations had. Many of them are working just as hard, if not harder, for outcomes that are objectively tougher to reach. Walking away from a bad deal is not quitting, it is recognizing when the system is not paying out the way it used to. Every older generation thinks the next one is soft. It is easier to blame character than admit the landscape changed.
My view is that it's not mostly from frustration. Some seem to have been born with expecting things to come to them.

My view is that is easier to blame landscape instead of character (and character isn't the right word; I just used your term).

I don't recall my parents thinking the younger generation to them was soft.”
 
I think part of the issue is some people in the boomer generation take offense to younger people identifying non-anecdotal metrics to explain that boomers had things easier. It can be difficult not to take that personally and say, "But I worked hard", or to somehow think a younger person is trying to "cheapen" a specific boomer's accomplishments because that generation had it easier on average. That's where I think the "you're just entitled" feelings come from.
Yep, and I really hope I don't start falling into this mindset as I get older. Because right now if a Zoomer or some teenager told me that my life was easy growing up, I would 110% agree. I didn't have to deal with maintaining a 24/7 social media presence to have a semblance of a social life, education getting upended by COVID, agonizing over picking a career that won't get eaten by AI, the looming dark cloud of school shootings being a weekly occurrence in America. In hindsight I was playing on easy mode compared to what these kids are going through, and I don't feel like that diminishes my own accomplishments at all.

Saying that someone had it easy really shouldn't be taken as an insult. It's a good thing, I'm happy for them. I just wish that more boomers had the desire to pay it forward and make life easier for younger generations too instead of pulling up the ladder and yelling "just work harder!" to feel some smug self satisfaction about those lazy youths.
 
Last edited:
Again, I don't care what the circumstances are now, compared to earlier days. That is different discussion. I said some of the younger generations don't go after things as hard as they should and expect more things to come to them. You then used the "excuse" of frustration. That is not a valid excuse. Everyone gets frustrated, but one has to figure out how to move forward anyway, if you want to. get to towards success.

Circumstances may be different now, but some of those circumstances make it easier to get ahead. All the of the circumstances have not gotten harder. You aren't recognizing that. For example, getting into aspects of technology have made things easier and quicker for some to get ahead, and get way ahead, faster. We'll see how much AI changes that.

If I was 25 now, I would go into something different and believe I would get ahead bigger and faster than I did before. There are many more opportunities and good areas now, in my view. Again, more people are chasing the best parts of the pie, I have read.

If a young person told me they were frustrated because some things were harder, I would not hire them.
Hard work and persistence have always mattered. Nobody is arguing otherwise. But dismissing the economic conditions people are operating in and reducing everything to attitude or work ethic is a pretty one sided way to look at it.

You keep pointing to tech and a few fast moving industries as proof things are easier now. Those are real opportunities, but they are narrow and extremely competitive. They do not replace the broad middle class path that existed when housing, education, and retirement security were structurally easier to access.

You openly say you “don’t care” whether circumstances changed and then turn around and make sweeping judgments about younger people’s character. If you ignore the landscape entirely, of course everything ends up looking like a work ethic problem. That doesn’t make the structural changes disappear.
 
This is why I jumped on the “frustration” excuse. Read it.



My view is that it's not mostly from frustration. Some seem to have been born with expecting things to come to them.

My view is that is easier to blame landscape instead of character (and character isn't the right word; I just used your term).

I don't recall my parents thinking the younger generation to them was soft.”
I think you’re underestimating how common that criticism is across generations. Older people calling the next generation lazy or entitled is a recurring pattern. The Psychology Behind Generational Conflict

In the 90s, Gen X was regularly described in the media as “lazy,” “confused,” and “apathetic.” Then millennials got the same label, and now Gen Z does too.

So when people hear the “young people are softer and don’t want to work” argument, it sounds familiar because every generation hears some version of it. That doesn’t mean there aren’t individuals with bad attitudes. It just means broad claims about an entire generation’s work ethic have a pretty long history of being wrong.
 
Hard work and persistence have always mattered. Nobody is arguing otherwise. But dismissing the economic conditions people are operating in and reducing everything to attitude or work ethic is a pretty one sided way to look at it.

You keep pointing to tech and a few fast moving industries as proof things are easier now. Those are real opportunities, but they are narrow and extremely competitive. They do not replace the broad middle class path that existed when housing, education, and retirement security were structurally easier to access.

You openly say you “don’t care” whether circumstances changed and then turn around and make sweeping judgments about younger people’s character. If you ignore the landscape entirely, of course everything ends up looking like a work ethic problem. That doesn’t make the structural changes disappear.
Again, I don’t like people who don’t work hard, whether they are frustrated or not, or the environment has changed or not. Why can’t you even acknowledge what I am saying. You are making excuses for lack of motivation. I generally don’t except excuses for that, unless the person isn’t healthy.

There is huge opportunity in the US. Yes, some things are competitive. Compete. Don’t whine.
 
Again, I don’t like people who don’t work hard, whether they are frustrated or not, or the environment has changed or not. Why can’t you even acknowledge what I am saying. You are making excuses for lack of motivation. I generally don’t except excuses for that, unless the person isn’t healthy.

There is huge opportunity in the US. Yes, some things are competitive. Compete. Don’t whine.
You keep acting like acknowledging economic conditions somehow equals defending laziness. That’s a pretty lazy argument in itself. Nobody here said people shouldn’t work hard or compete.

What you’re doing is taking a complex economic discussion and reducing it to “people are whining.” That’s not analysis, that’s just refusing to engage with the facts people are putting in front of you. Housing costs, tuition, and retirement risk shifting to individuals are not opinions.

Honestly it just reads like you decided decades ago that everything comes down to work ethic, and now you’re forcing every conversation back into that box. If you’re unwilling to even consider that the landscape changed, then you’re not really debating anything, you’re just repeating the same talking point in a loop, which is a common boomer trait.
 
I think you’re underestimating how common that criticism is across generations. Older people calling the next generation lazy or entitled is a recurring pattern. The Psychology Behind Generational Conflict

In the 90s, Gen X was regularly described in the media as “lazy,” “confused,” and “apathetic.” Then millennials got the same label, and now Gen Z does too.

So when people hear the “young people are softer and don’t want to work” argument, it sounds familiar because every generation hears some version of it. That doesn’t mean there aren’t individuals with bad attitudes. It just means broad claims about an entire generation’s work ethic have a pretty long history of being wrong.
I made no broad claims about any generation. I said some younger people. SOME. Some
don’t work hard enough and are entitled, it the rich subcategory. They bounce from job to job too much, in my view.

I am not a person or a Boomer who makes broad generalizations about generations. So your generalization doesn’t apply to me. My no views are from direct experience and observation.

And I am not talking about middle class jobs.
 
Last edited:
Yep, and I really hope I don't start falling into this mindset as I get older. Because right now if a Zoomer or some teenager told me that my life was easy growing up, I would 110% agree. I didn't have to deal with maintaining a 24/7 social media presence to have a semblance of a social life, education getting upended by COVID, agonizing over picking a career that won't get eaten by AI, the looming dark cloud of school shootings being a weekly occurrence in America. In hindsight I was playing on easy mode compared to what these kids are going through, and I don't feel like that diminishes my own accomplishments at all.

Saying that someone had it easy really shouldn't be taken as an insult. It's a good thing, I'm happy for them. I just wish that more boomers had the desire to pay it forward and make life easier for younger generations too instead of pulling up the ladder and yelling "just work harder!" to feel some smug self satisfaction about those lazy youths.
All we can do is learn from that and not do it ourselves.
 
Yep, and I really hope I don't start falling into this mindset as I get older. Because right now if a Zoomer or some teenager told me that my life was easy growing up, I would 110% agree. I didn't have to deal with maintaining a 24/7 social media presence to have a semblance of a social life, education getting upended by COVID, agonizing over picking a career that won't get eaten by AI, the looming dark cloud of school shootings being a weekly occurrence in America. In hindsight I was playing on easy mode compared to what these kids are going through, and I don't feel like that diminishes my own accomplishments at all.

Saying that someone had it easy really shouldn't be taken as an insult. It's a good thing, I'm happy for them. I just wish that more boomers had the desire to pay it forward and make life easier for younger generations too instead of pulling up the ladder and yelling "just work harder!" to feel some smug self satisfaction about those lazy youths.
My kids and my younger relatives had no problem getting through what you said in your first paragraph. Same with most of my kids’ friends. They had it easier than I did. They had way more advantages. They didn’t even have to learn to use a slide rule. They are meeting the challenges of the world. They met their spouses the same way I did. In schools and bars. They didn’t need social media to have a social life.

Some of you sure have a lot of excuses.
 
They bounce from job to job too much, in my view.
I think this is a good example of how some things have changed. In my industry at least, you will get a raised eyebrow if your resume shows that you've been at the same company 2+ years. It implies that you're too lazy and unmotivated to hustle for better opportunities and just want to slack at the office collecting a paycheck. Company loyalty is no longer a thing, you need to job hop if you want to be seen as a motivated go-getter in the eyes of a hiring manager.

I'm not complaining or making excuses about this, just pointing out that it's different. Heck, with signing bonuses you make more money this way so maybe it's better. But I can see how someone could look at this from the outside and go "wow, these guys are entitled quitters" while the perception on the inside is that these are the hardest workers, even if you only retain them for 18 months.

My kids and my younger relatives had no problem getting through what you said in your first paragraph. Same with most of my kids’ friends. They had it easier than I did. They had way more advantages. They didn’t even have to learn to use a slide rule. They are meeting the challenges of the world. They met their spouses the same way I did. In schools and bars. They didn’t need social media to have a social life.

Some of you sure have a lot of excuses.
Good for them! Sounds like they're definitely not entitled and lazy.
 
Last edited:
I think this is a good example of how some things have changed. In my industry at least, you will get a raised eyebrow if your resume shows that you've been at the same company 2+ years. It implies that you're too lazy and unmotivated to hustle for better opportunities and just want to slack at the office collecting a paycheck. Company loyalty is no longer a thing, you need to job hop if you want to be seen as a motivated go-getter in the eyes of a hiring manager.

I'm not complaining or making excuses about this, just pointing out that it's different. Heck, with signing bonuses you make more money this way so maybe it's better. But I can see how someone could look at this from the outside and go "wow, these guys are entitled quitters" while the perception on the inside is that you will get a damn good hard worker, even if it's only for 18 months.


Good for them! Sounds like they're definitely not entitled and lazy.
What’s your industry? Not that way in the professional jobs. If you bounce in tech, you lose your options. I wouldn’t hire a secretary, executive assistant or legal assistance if they looked like bouncers. Not university jobs.
 
What’s your industry? Not that way in the professional jobs. If you bounce in tech, you lose your options. I wouldn’t hire a secretary, executive assistant or legal assistance if they looked like bouncers. Not university jobs.
My son is in web design/programming and a majority of people bounce around. In many professions it is the nature of the beast, including tech fields.
 
What’s your industry? Not that way in the professional jobs. If you bounce in tech, you lose your options. I wouldn’t hire a secretary, executive assistant or legal assistance if they looked like bouncers. Not university jobs.
It falls under the "tech" umbrella. Average tenure at Google is 1.1 years. It varies, but generally speaking most of your shares will vest in the first 2 years and then it's time to demand more or walk out.

Totally agree that the roles you mention need folks who are in it for the long haul. Workers in Big Tech tend to be more like mercenaries.
 
Last edited:
It falls under the "tech" umbrella. Average tenure at Google is 1.1 years. It varies, but generally speaking most of your shares will vest in the first 2 years and then it's time to demand more or walk out.

Totally agree that the roles you mention need folks who are in it for the long haul. Workers in Big Tech tend to be more like mercenaries.
I should have said private tech companies. Options rarely vest in full in 2 years for public companies. Thx.
 
Last edited:
I just don’t see the work ethic in the new generation that I have seen in the elder generations like Colt Anderson and Marc Mariani.
 
I just don’t see the work ethic in the new generation that I have seen in the elder generations like Colt Anderson and Marc Mariani.
Work ethic just looks different today than it did 40 years ago. Younger generations today are generally healthier and more intentional about lifestyle than older generations were at the same age. Millennials and Gen Z drinks less alcohol, smokes far less, exercises more, and tends to pay a lot more attention to things like diet, and overall wellbeing.

Meanwhile, older adults (Boomers) who lecture them about “work ethic” are retired, sedentary, and spend large chunks of their day glued to cable news, political outrage cycles, or trying to spread their rhetoric on a place like eGriz. That’s not exactly a shining example of grit and discipline either.

Every generation has its strengths and weaknesses. But the idea that younger people uniquely lack work ethic says more about nostalgia than it does about reality.
 
Work ethic just looks different today than it did 40 years ago. Younger generations today are generally healthier and more intentional about lifestyle than older generations were at the same age. Millennials and Gen Z drinks less alcohol, smokes far less, exercises more, and tends to pay a lot more attention to things like diet, and overall wellbeing.

Meanwhile, older adults (Boomers) who lecture them about “work ethic” are retired, sedentary, and spend large chunks of their day glued to cable news, political outrage cycles, or trying to spread their rhetoric on a place like eGriz. That’s not exactly a shining example of grit and discipline either.

Every generation has its strengths and weaknesses. But the idea that younger people uniquely lack work ethic says more about nostalgia than it does about reality.
Gen Z is the virgin generation and are having less sex than previous generations which goes directly against your statement that they are more concerned about health and overall well being. Older adults currently middle aged (millennials) had a more difficult economic environment with the recession and they are in the middle of their working career and middle age, not retired.
 
You're generalizing. Ive met plenty of young people with great work ethics and plenty of lazy old bastards.
Generalizing yes it doesn’t apply to everyone. There are still lazy millennials and hard working zoomers but overall as a generalization there does seem to be a shift between the younger and older generation of non geriatric adults.
 
Gen Z is the virgin generation and are having less sex than previous generations which goes directly against your statement that they are more concerned about health and overall well being. Older adults currently middle aged (millennials) had a more difficult economic environment with the recession and they are in the middle of their working career and middle age, not retired.
That’s a pretty weak connection you’re trying to make. Having less sex doesn’t mean a generation is less focused on health or wellbeing. If anything, Gen Z also drinks less, smokes less, and exercises more than previous generations at the same age, which are actual health indicators.

As for millennials, I never stated they were retired. The point is that a lot of the loudest criticism about “work ethic” tends to come from older generations looking backward through nostalgia. Every generation thinks the one after it is softer, but the data rarely backs that up.

Honestly it just sounds like you’re grabbing at whatever statistic you can find to keep the “young people are lazy” narrative alive. The reality is the habits younger generations are forming today are far healthier than the ones older generations normalized for decades.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top