• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Enrollment Up Again

mthoopsfan said:
One of my teams is considered as the likely best team in modern-day Ivy history, certain the best Dartmouth team ever (maybe tied with the '25 or '26 team, a 100 years ago). My class has the best varsity record for our years in Dartmouth history, except tied with one of those older teams.

"The 1970 Dartmouth football team is widely considered the best team in modern Ivy League history (post-1956 formation). They achieved a perfect 9-0 record, won the Ivy League title, and were ranked 14th in the final 1970 AP Poll, making them the last Ivy League school to finish ranked in the final AP Poll.
Wikipedia
Here is why the 1970 Dartmouth team holds this status:
  • Dominant Performance: The team shut out six of its nine opponents, including the last four games of the season.
  • National Ranking: They were ranked 14th in both major polls (AP and Coaches).
  • Elite Defense: The team led the nation in major college scoring defense, allowing an average of only 4.7 points per game. [Only 3 teams scored on Dartmouth, and no field goals]
  • Lambert Trophy: They won the Lambert-Meadowlands Trophy, designating them as the champions of the East.
  • Signature Wins: The 1970 team dominated opponents, including a 38-0 win over Princeton (reversing a 1969 loss) and a 10-0 shutout victory against Yale at the Yale Bowl [in front of 61,000 people}
  • Elite Leadership: Led by coach Bob Blackman, the team included standout quarterback Jim Chasey and running back John Short, who shared the first-ever Bushnell Trophy as the Ivy League's outstanding players.
While other teams have had perfect seasons (such as Penn in 1986 and 1993, or Harvard in 2004), the 1970 Dartmouth team's national ranking and defensive dominance are generally considered unparalleled in the modern era of the league."
AI and Wikipedi.
Click to expand...
Once again, and this time I'm gonna use your real name. JACK when you use ai you look less intelligent than your Dartmouth education allows.
 
uofmman1122 said:
We have a total of 5 more undergrad students this spring compared to last spring (5,771 now vs. 5,766 last year).

I'm sorry, but that is fucking awful.

Graduate and Missoula College gains are great, but undergrad enrollment is the lifeblood of this school, and they have to figure that out.
Click to expand...
Huh, I wonder if it has to do with them cutting the programs that make um um.
 
mthoopsfan said:
Once again. No, it doesn’t. AI is how to research.
Click to expand...
No looking for sources on your own is how to research. Compiling data is how to research. You didn't reasearch JACKshit, you took a prompt, then an ai spit some slop out you, then you highlighted the slip,then you hit Ctrl+c, then you hit Ctrl+v and spread that slop in here.
 
AnotherGrizFan said:
You have stated multiple times on this site that you, a guy who was all league once in his entire college football career, is in the Dartmouth Football Hall of Fame. You also stated that Wearers of the Green is NOT the Dartmouth Athletic Hall of Fame. And yet, if someone googles "Wearers of the Green" they will find dartmouthsports.com and see the official Wearers of the Green homepage where they clearly state that they are "Dartmouth's athletic hall of fame".
There are over 1200 members of that hall of fame and dozens of football players...but not you. But still, you insist that because you were all league one time you are in the Dartmouth football hall of fame that doesn't actually exist.
I can hardly wait to see how you try to lie your way out of this, Jack.
Click to expand...
The real question is why does this bother you so much?

People who spend time on other people - literally memorizing their prior posts - on sports message boards...why?

I can assure you hoops spends no time thinking about you - except when he's posting responses.
 
grizjumps45 said:
No looking for sources on your own is how to research. Compiling data is how to research. You didn't reasearch JACKshit, you took a prompt, then an ai spit some slop out you, then you highlighted the slip,then you hit Ctrl+c, then you hit Ctrl+v and spread that slop in here.
Click to expand...
And what ai said on Harvard and ivies was 100% accurate and in nice readable firm. It’s terrific what I used it for. Looks like you don’t understand ai and what it’s good at. It’s terrific. I suppose it may put alot graphic designers out of business.
 
SoldierGriz said:
The real question is why does this bother you so much?

People who spend time on other people - literally memorizing their prior posts - on sports message boards...why?

I can assure you hoops spends no time thinking about you - except when he's posting responses.
Click to expand...
He claims he doesn’t lie and challenges people on this site to prove otherwise. Why does it bother you so much that I just did?
And you can’t assure me of what anyone thinks much less hoops.
 
mthoopsfan said:
And what ai said on Harvard and ivies was 100% accurate and in nice readable firm. It’s terrific what I used it for. Looks like you don’t understand ai and what it’s good at. It’s terrific. I suppose it may put alot graphic designers out of business.
Click to expand...
Hoops. I do it professionally on the side for a little extra cash. But, if you think it's cool to put people out of business who are reliant on those jobs you're legit scum.
 
mthoopsfan said:
The “athletic” hall of fame is not the “football” hall of fame. Completely different. Wearers of the Green Is overseen by its own group. There arent many football players in wearers of the green. When I was at Dartmouth, the football hall of fame was first team all-ivy. Don’t think Wearers of Green existed You don’t know what you are talking about. You probably think the Univ of
Montana and Montana State University are the same.

In football, you have to have been an all-American for Wearers of the Green, which was established in 1985. These are the players in of WofG from my era (from '65 to '88). 5 guys in a 24-year period.


Edward C. Long III ‘66Associated Press
J. Murry Bowden ‘71Football Coaches, Walter Camp
Thomas C. Csatari ‘74Associated Press
Reginald Williams ‘76Football Coaches, Associated Press
Craig R. Morton ‘89Associated Press

​
Click to expand...
This seems like there are same massive leaps in your logic. You're apart of the hall of fame but your not really in the Hall of fame. It's like that imaginary place players like jordy Nelson exist: The hall of very good!
 
SoldierGriz said:
The real question is why does this bother you so much?

People who spend time on other people - literally memorizing their prior posts - on sports message boards...why?

I can assure you hoops spends no time thinking about you - except when he's posting responses.
Click to expand...
Your last para is correct. I agree with your first 2 paras too.
 
grizjumps45 said:
This seems like there are same massive leaps in your logic. You're apart of the hall of fame but you’re not really in the Hall of fame. It's like that imaginary place players like jordy Nelson exist: The hall of very good!
Click to expand...
There are various halls of fame. Is that hard for you to understand? An athletic hall of fame is not a football hall of fame.
 
grizjumps45 said:
No looking for sources on your own is how to research. Compiling data is how to research. You didn't reasearch JACKshit, you took a prompt, then an ai spit some slop out you, then you highlighted the slip,then you hit Ctrl+c, then you hit Ctrl+v and spread that slop in here.
Click to expand...
Are you gonna attack the other 10 posters that do this too or you just got a hard on for PR?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top