• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Nuanez Now Interview With Kent Haslam

Griz til I die

Well-known member
DONOR
Great interview last night Colter! I thought Kent was very open and honest about the whole situation! Even breaking down the Soccer coaching search and why it took so long he was very transparent about!
 
Great interview last night Colter! I thought Kent was very open and honest about the whole situation! Even breaking down the Soccer coaching search and why it took so long he was very transparent about!
I believe this is relevant based on some of Kent's comments.

In the not to distant future schools will have less say and control.
It isn't just a rumor—the "professionalization" of college football is accelerating. While teams aren't being sold off like franchises just yet, the barrier between a university department and a private corporation is thinning rapidly.
As of early 2026, several major shifts are moving college football toward a private organizational model:
1. The Rise of "Private Capital" Partnerships
Instead of direct ownership, schools are forming joint ventures. A landmark example is the University of Utah, which recently partnered with the private equity firm Otro Capital in a $500 million deal.
The Structure: The school creates a separate for-profit entity to manage commercial assets (media rights, sponsorships, ticketing).
The Stake: The private firm takes a minority ownership stake in that specific company, not the university itself, to bypass legal hurdles regarding the school's non-profit status.
2. Conference-Level Privatization
The Big Ten and Big 12 have both explored multibillion-dollar deals with firms like RedBird Capital and CVC Capital Partners.
In one proposed model, a conference would spin off its media and commercial rights into a new company (e.g., "Big Ten Enterprises").
Private equity firms would then buy a 10–15% stake in that company, providing schools with immediate cash to pay players and build facilities in exchange for a slice of future TV revenue.
3. The "Super League" Concept
There is serious momentum behind the idea of a College Football Super League. This would effectively decouple the top 70–80 football programs from the NCAA and their traditional conferences.
This league would likely operate as a private commercial entity, similar to Formula 1 or the English Premier League.
Teams would still wear the "Michigan" or "Alabama" colors, but the financial and operational control would sit with the league's private board of directors and investors.
4. Why Is This Happening?
The primary driver is the House v. NCAA settlement, which now allows schools to share revenue directly with athletes (up to roughly $20.5 million per year per school). Universities are looking for "private" ways to fund these massive new expenses without draining their academic budgets.
 
I believe this is relevant based on some of Kent's comments.

In the not to distant future schools will have less say and control.
It isn't just a rumor—the "professionalization" of college football is accelerating. While teams aren't being sold off like franchises just yet, the barrier between a university department and a private corporation is thinning rapidly.
As of early 2026, several major shifts are moving college football toward a private organizational model:
1. The Rise of "Private Capital" Partnerships
Instead of direct ownership, schools are forming joint ventures. A landmark example is the University of Utah, which recently partnered with the private equity firm Otro Capital in a $500 million deal.
The Structure: The school creates a separate for-profit entity to manage commercial assets (media rights, sponsorships, ticketing).
The Stake: The private firm takes a minority ownership stake in that specific company, not the university itself, to bypass legal hurdles regarding the school's non-profit status.
2. Conference-Level Privatization
The Big Ten and Big 12 have both explored multibillion-dollar deals with firms like RedBird Capital and CVC Capital Partners.
In one proposed model, a conference would spin off its media and commercial rights into a new company (e.g., "Big Ten Enterprises").
Private equity firms would then buy a 10–15% stake in that company, providing schools with immediate cash to pay players and build facilities in exchange for a slice of future TV revenue.
3. The "Super League" Concept
There is serious momentum behind the idea of a College Football Super League. This would effectively decouple the top 70–80 football programs from the NCAA and their traditional conferences.
This league would likely operate as a private commercial entity, similar to Formula 1 or the English Premier League.
Teams would still wear the "Michigan" or "Alabama" colors, but the financial and operational control would sit with the league's private board of directors and investors.
4. Why Is This Happening?
The primary driver is the House v. NCAA settlement, which now allows schools to share revenue directly with athletes (up to roughly $20.5 million per year per school). Universities are looking for "private" ways to fund these massive new expenses without draining their academic budgets.
Thanks for the terrific and well-written summary. I read some articles at one point earlier about this private partnership possibility and the interest of private investors (and may have posted one), but I didn't realize that the concept and structure had advanced so far. I wonder if the less profitable schools left in the bigger/better conferences will get pushed out, or if their financial stake will just get decreased down to the financial value that their schools brings to the new private partnership, or to the tv aspect of the new partnership. I assume that some of this was already being done in come conferences prior to the private partnerships. As people have been saying for years, this is clearly going to lead to the top schools/conferences breaking off in at least football. Note that the school has to create a for-profit entity for this.
 
I believe this is relevant based on some of Kent's comments.

In the not to distant future schools will have less say and control.
It isn't just a rumor—the "professionalization" of college football is accelerating. While teams aren't being sold off like franchises just yet, the barrier between a university department and a private corporation is thinning rapidly.
As of early 2026, several major shifts are moving college football toward a private organizational model:
1. The Rise of "Private Capital" Partnerships
Instead of direct ownership, schools are forming joint ventures. A landmark example is the University of Utah, which recently partnered with the private equity firm Otro Capital in a $500 million deal.
The Structure: The school creates a separate for-profit entity to manage commercial assets (media rights, sponsorships, ticketing).
The Stake: The private firm takes a minority ownership stake in that specific company, not the university itself, to bypass legal hurdles regarding the school's non-profit status.
2. Conference-Level Privatization
The Big Ten and Big 12 have both explored multibillion-dollar deals with firms like RedBird Capital and CVC Capital Partners.
In one proposed model, a conference would spin off its media and commercial rights into a new company (e.g., "Big Ten Enterprises").
Private equity firms would then buy a 10–15% stake in that company, providing schools with immediate cash to pay players and build facilities in exchange for a slice of future TV revenue.
3. The "Super League" Concept
There is serious momentum behind the idea of a College Football Super League. This would effectively decouple the top 70–80 football programs from the NCAA and their traditional conferences.
This league would likely operate as a private commercial entity, similar to Formula 1 or the English Premier League.
Teams would still wear the "Michigan" or "Alabama" colors, but the financial and operational control would sit with the league's private board of directors and investors.
4. Why Is This Happening?
The primary driver is the House v. NCAA settlement, which now allows schools to share revenue directly with athletes (up to roughly $20.5 million per year per school). Universities are looking for "private" ways to fund these massive new expenses without draining their academic budgets.
Which AI platform do you use?
 
I use several. I am beginning to like Gemini
I too like Gemini and that is my main AI. I don't know much about it. It just poppped up on my screen via Google 6 or 8 months ago. I like Grok too, but you have to pay after you finish your first your first topic, I believe.
 
I too like Gemini and that is my main AI. I don't know much about it. It just poppped up on my screen via Google 6 or 8 months ago. I like Grok too, but you have to pay after you finish your first your first topic, I believe.
Gemini has been good for my research and my job (retire the 1st of May). I at least give my employer notice
 
Sounds like the university will go for those liquidated damages for the breach of contract as they should.
Interesting. I have a few questions maybe you can answer:

If Hauck retired and UM accepted that retirement, on what grounds would liquidated damages even apply?

Do you know whether Hauck’s contract actually includes a liquidated‑damages clause triggered by retirement?

What part of his contract would UM rely on to claim a breach, given that Hauck retired rather than resigned?
 
He said he was retiring but he didn't, so that should trigger Illinois having to pay Hauck's buyout.
Not true. It depends on timing. If
he wasn’t aware of Ill job prior to informing UM he was retiring, no argument whatsoever of a breach of contract. Zero. If the Ill job was going to the Seattle guy until after Super Bowl, Hauck couldn’t have been in mode to go to Ill. See various posts including Oredigger’s.
 
Not true. It depends on timing. If
he wasn’t aware of Ill job prior to informing UM he was retiring, no argument whatsoever of a breach of contract. Zero. If the Ill job was going to the Seattle guy until after Super Bowl, Hauck couldn’t have been in mode to go to Ill. See various posts including Oredigger’s.
Guess it depends how a judge would look at that but I feel like UM has a decent case for fighting it. Plus if Illinois is really gonna squawk at paying a $250k buyout, then they're the cheapskates in the Big Ten.
 
Back
Top