• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

For Griz fans who have become unglued by the losses to the Bobcats

mthoopsfan

Well-known member
Take a breath of air, step back from the ledge, relax.

From Roger Federer's commencement speech at Dartmouth in 2024.

"One day last June, during a steady rain on a chilly morning in New Hampshire, Roger Federer told a story about failure.

Over the course of two decades, he emerged as one of the greatest tennis players who ever lived. He played 1,526 singles matches in his career and won almost 80 percent. He hoisted 20 Grand Slam trophies, including Wimbledon a record eight times.

“Now, I have a question for you,” Federer said, looking out across a sea of umbrellas at the commencement ceremony for Dartmouth College. “What percentage of points do you think I won in those matches?”

He paused.

“Only 54 percent,” he said.


It was one of those statistics that at first seemed incorrect. Federer was one of the most dominant athletic forces of this century. That guy lost nearly half of his points?

“When you lose every second point, on average, you learn not to dwell on every shot,” he told the crowd. “You teach yourself to think, ‘OK, I double-faulted. It’s only a point.When you’re playing a point, it has to be the most important thing in the world, and it is. But when it’s behind you, it’s behind you. This mindset is really crucial, because it frees you to fully commit to the next point and the next point after that, with intensity, clarity and focus.”

Federer summed up his motivation for speaking at Dartmouth in two words: beer pong.

The actual reason was more personal; his agent Tony Godsick is a Dartmouth alum and Godsick’s daughter was a member of the 2024 class. But Federer understood that nearly every commencement speech features a few local shoutouts, in this case a mention of the EBA’s chicken sandwich from Lou’s and the local pastime, Pong, a drinking game said to have been invented by Dartmouth students.

Federer’s speech, which was 3,200 words and lasted 25 minutes, was structured to share three lessons — “tennis lessons,” as Federer explained — all of which emanated from his long career and his own recent “graduation” from tennis.
https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/3621407/2022/09/23/roger-federer-retirement/
The first lesson: Effortless is a myth.

For as long as Federer dominated on court, commentators had remarked upon how easy he made it look. He glided around in balletic fashion, ripping one-handed backhands. He never seemed to sweat. But there was only one way, Federer explained, to make something look that easy.

“It’s not about having a gift,” he said. “It’s about having grit.”

Federer’s second lesson: It’s only a point.

It was here that he shared the story of his five-set loss to Rafael Nadal in the 2008 Wimbledon final, a match widely considered by many as one of the greatest of all time. Seeking his sixth consecutive Wimbledon title, Federer had lost the first two sets, clawed back into the match by winning tie-breaks in the third and fourth sets, only to lose 9-7 in an epic fifth, the match ending in the evening dusk.

“You can work harder than you thought possible and still lose,” Federer said, before adding: “Perfection is impossible.”

It was at this moment that Federer referenced his career record and his percentage of points won: 54 percent.

“Negative energy is wasted energy,” Federer said. “You want to become a master at overcoming hard moments.”

If you lose one point, there’s no use in wallowing, because there might be another point — a break point, a set point — that means more. The match is long. There’s always time to come back. In classical rhetoric terms, the anecdote was an example of logos, or using a compelling statistic to appeal to logic.

In tennis, a small, consistent edge over your opponent can translate into big margins in the long run. Nadal, for instance, also won exactly 54 percent of his points. And when Carlos Alcaraz defeated Jannik Sinner on Sunday in the French Open final — in one of the greatest matches since the 2008 Wimbledon final — Alcaraz, the champion, actually won one fewer point than Sinner.

It’s an easy concept to apply to almost any field. In 2022, Ronald van Loon, a portfolio manager at BlackRock, authored a paper on the percentage of investment decisions that need to be correct to beat market benchmarks for returns. He researched markets, crunched the numbers and came up with a number: As low as 53 percent.
https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6392045/2025/05/30/michael-kosta-comedian-tennis-losing-stand-up/
Michael Kosta, a rotating host of The Daily Show on Comedy Central and a former professional tennis player, viewed the clip through the lens of a standup comedian. Federer may have only won 54 percent of his points, Kosta said, but he always seemed to win the points that mattered most.

“He always brought his best at the right time,” Kosta said. “And that’s an important part of comedy, too. You can have a rough five minutes in your set. You can lose the audience. But as long as you get them back by the end, I think that’s kind of most important.”

Which set up Federer’s final lesson: Life is bigger than the court.

The graduates before him would be record-breakers and world travelers, leaders and philanthropists. In other words, they were going places, and if they ever saw him in the future, he said, they should say hi.

As Federer concluded his speech in the rain, he finished up his “tennis lessons” and pivoted to something fun — a real tennis lesson. He stood on stage and clutched a racket in his hand, suggested an Eastern grip and showcased the proper placement for your knuckles, which, he said, should allow for easy switching from forehand to backhand.

0/2025/06/10/roger-federer-viral-commencement-speech/
 
Hoops just out of curiosity, do you enjoy losing to the cats? And not just losing to them, but losing to them twice? Especially when they ended our season and we had a legit shot to win the natty and now they’re likely gonna win it cause we couldn’t beat them?

I personally don’t wanna lose in the semis when we have the offensive firepower to win it all!
 
Take a breath of air, step back from the ledge, relax.

From Roger Federer's commencement speech at Dartmouth in 2024.

"One day last June, during a steady rain on a chilly morning in New Hampshire, Roger Federer told a story about failure.

Over the course of two decades, he emerged as one of the greatest tennis players who ever lived. He played 1,526 singles matches in his career and won almost 80 percent. He hoisted 20 Grand Slam trophies, including Wimbledon a record eight times.

“Now, I have a question for you,” Federer said, looking out across a sea of umbrellas at the commencement ceremony for Dartmouth College. “What percentage of points do you think I won in those matches?”

He paused.

“Only 54 percent,” he said.


It was one of those statistics that at first seemed incorrect. Federer was one of the most dominant athletic forces of this century. That guy lost nearly half of his points?

“When you lose every second point, on average, you learn not to dwell on every shot,” he told the crowd. “You teach yourself to think, ‘OK, I double-faulted. It’s only a point.When you’re playing a point, it has to be the most important thing in the world, and it is. But when it’s behind you, it’s behind you. This mindset is really crucial, because it frees you to fully commit to the next point and the next point after that, with intensity, clarity and focus.”

Federer summed up his motivation for speaking at Dartmouth in two words: beer pong.

The actual reason was more personal; his agent Tony Godsick is a Dartmouth alum and Godsick’s daughter was a member of the 2024 class. But Federer understood that nearly every commencement speech features a few local shoutouts, in this case a mention of the EBA’s chicken sandwich from Lou’s and the local pastime, Pong, a drinking game said to have been invented by Dartmouth students.

Federer’s speech, which was 3,200 words and lasted 25 minutes, was structured to share three lessons — “tennis lessons,” as Federer explained — all of which emanated from his long career and his own recent “graduation” from tennis.
https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/3621407/2022/09/23/roger-federer-retirement/
The first lesson: Effortless is a myth.

For as long as Federer dominated on court, commentators had remarked upon how easy he made it look. He glided around in balletic fashion, ripping one-handed backhands. He never seemed to sweat. But there was only one way, Federer explained, to make something look that easy.

“It’s not about having a gift,” he said. “It’s about having grit.”

Federer’s second lesson: It’s only a point.

It was here that he shared the story of his five-set loss to Rafael Nadal in the 2008 Wimbledon final, a match widely considered by many as one of the greatest of all time. Seeking his sixth consecutive Wimbledon title, Federer had lost the first two sets, clawed back into the match by winning tie-breaks in the third and fourth sets, only to lose 9-7 in an epic fifth, the match ending in the evening dusk.

“You can work harder than you thought possible and still lose,” Federer said, before adding: “Perfection is impossible.”

It was at this moment that Federer referenced his career record and his percentage of points won: 54 percent.

“Negative energy is wasted energy,” Federer said. “You want to become a master at overcoming hard moments.”

If you lose one point, there’s no use in wallowing, because there might be another point — a break point, a set point — that means more. The match is long. There’s always time to come back. In classical rhetoric terms, the anecdote was an example of logos, or using a compelling statistic to appeal to logic.

In tennis, a small, consistent edge over your opponent can translate into big margins in the long run. Nadal, for instance, also won exactly 54 percent of his points. And when Carlos Alcaraz defeated Jannik Sinner on Sunday in the French Open final — in one of the greatest matches since the 2008 Wimbledon final — Alcaraz, the champion, actually won one fewer point than Sinner.

It’s an easy concept to apply to almost any field. In 2022, Ronald van Loon, a portfolio manager at BlackRock, authored a paper on the percentage of investment decisions that need to be correct to beat market benchmarks for returns. He researched markets, crunched the numbers and came up with a number: As low as 53 percent.
https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6392045/2025/05/30/michael-kosta-comedian-tennis-losing-stand-up/
Michael Kosta, a rotating host of The Daily Show on Comedy Central and a former professional tennis player, viewed the clip through the lens of a standup comedian. Federer may have only won 54 percent of his points, Kosta said, but he always seemed to win the points that mattered most.

“He always brought his best at the right time,” Kosta said. “And that’s an important part of comedy, too. You can have a rough five minutes in your set. You can lose the audience. But as long as you get them back by the end, I think that’s kind of most important.”

Which set up Federer’s final lesson: Life is bigger than the court.

The graduates before him would be record-breakers and world travelers, leaders and philanthropists. In other words, they were going places, and if they ever saw him in the future, he said, they should say hi.

As Federer concluded his speech in the rain, he finished up his “tennis lessons” and pivoted to something fun — a real tennis lesson. He stood on stage and clutched a racket in his hand, suggested an Eastern grip and showcased the proper placement for your knuckles, which, he said, should allow for easy switching from forehand to backhand.

0/2025/06/10/roger-federer-viral-commencement-speech/
Outstanding! Deserves more than just a "Like." Pretty much says it all for sports in general. Even Tom Brady, arguably the GOAT at his position, failed to complete over a third of his passes. (I find Brady unlikable in his TV appearance, but you have to respect his overall accomplishments.)
 
Hoops just out of curiosity, do you enjoy losing to the cats? And not just losing to them, but losing to them twice? Especially when they ended our season and we had a legit shot to win the natty and now they’re likely gonna win it cause we couldn’t beat them?

I personally don’t wanna lose in the semis when we have the offensive firepower to win it all!
“Asked and answered, counsellor!”
 
Hoops just out of curiosity, do you enjoy losing to the cats? And not just losing to them, but losing to them twice? Especially when they ended our season and we had a legit shot to win the natty and now they’re likely gonna win it cause we couldn’t beat them?

I personally don’t wanna lose in the semis when we have the offensive firepower to win it all!
Nope, but we won 13 other games and that is very important too. I think Ill St will win. If Cats win, congrats to Cats.

The O didn’t do much against Cats in last game. Except the 3 drives in a row. Where were they the first half and 4th Q?
 
Outstanding! Deserves more than just a "Like." Pretty much says it all for sports in general. Even Tom Brady, arguably the GOAT at his position, failed to complete over a third of his passes. (I find Brady unlikable in his TV appearance, but you have to respect his overall accomplishments.)
Same characters in every post making excuses and coping for the fact Bobby can’t live up to the promises he made when he took the job.

The uncomfortable truth is no human not named Robert Hauck would be given the same latitude for failure against the Cats.
 
Same characters in every post making excuses and coping for the fact Bobby can’t live up to the promises he made when he took the job.

The uncomfortable truth is no human not named Robert Hauck would be given the same latitude for failure against the Cats.
BS. No coach in the world would be fired for 13-2 seasons. NONE. And playoffs ever year. And semis and champ game 2 out of 3. Few people in the world would make dumb comments like you do.
 
Take a breath of air, step back from the ledge, relax.

From Roger Federer's commencement speech at Dartmouth in 2024.

"One day last June, during a steady rain on a chilly morning in New Hampshire, Roger Federer told a story about failure.

Over the course of two decades, he emerged as one of the greatest tennis players who ever lived. He played 1,526 singles matches in his career and won almost 80 percent. He hoisted 20 Grand Slam trophies, including Wimbledon a record eight times.

“Now, I have a question for you,” Federer said, looking out across a sea of umbrellas at the commencement ceremony for Dartmouth College. “What percentage of points do you think I won in those matches?”

He paused.

“Only 54 percent,” he said.


It was one of those statistics that at first seemed incorrect. Federer was one of the most dominant athletic forces of this century. That guy lost nearly half of his points?

“When you lose every second point, on average, you learn not to dwell on every shot,” he told the crowd. “You teach yourself to think, ‘OK, I double-faulted. It’s only a point.When you’re playing a point, it has to be the most important thing in the world, and it is. But when it’s behind you, it’s behind you. This mindset is really crucial, because it frees you to fully commit to the next point and the next point after that, with intensity, clarity and focus.”

Federer summed up his motivation for speaking at Dartmouth in two words: beer pong.

The actual reason was more personal; his agent Tony Godsick is a Dartmouth alum and Godsick’s daughter was a member of the 2024 class. But Federer understood that nearly every commencement speech features a few local shoutouts, in this case a mention of the EBA’s chicken sandwich from Lou’s and the local pastime, Pong, a drinking game said to have been invented by Dartmouth students.

Federer’s speech, which was 3,200 words and lasted 25 minutes, was structured to share three lessons — “tennis lessons,” as Federer explained — all of which emanated from his long career and his own recent “graduation” from tennis.
https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/3621407/2022/09/23/roger-federer-retirement/
The first lesson: Effortless is a myth.

For as long as Federer dominated on court, commentators had remarked upon how easy he made it look. He glided around in balletic fashion, ripping one-handed backhands. He never seemed to sweat. But there was only one way, Federer explained, to make something look that easy.

“It’s not about having a gift,” he said. “It’s about having grit.”

Federer’s second lesson: It’s only a point.

It was here that he shared the story of his five-set loss to Rafael Nadal in the 2008 Wimbledon final, a match widely considered by many as one of the greatest of all time. Seeking his sixth consecutive Wimbledon title, Federer had lost the first two sets, clawed back into the match by winning tie-breaks in the third and fourth sets, only to lose 9-7 in an epic fifth, the match ending in the evening dusk.

“You can work harder than you thought possible and still lose,” Federer said, before adding: “Perfection is impossible.”

It was at this moment that Federer referenced his career record and his percentage of points won: 54 percent.

“Negative energy is wasted energy,” Federer said. “You want to become a master at overcoming hard moments.”

If you lose one point, there’s no use in wallowing, because there might be another point — a break point, a set point — that means more. The match is long. There’s always time to come back. In classical rhetoric terms, the anecdote was an example of logos, or using a compelling statistic to appeal to logic.

In tennis, a small, consistent edge over your opponent can translate into big margins in the long run. Nadal, for instance, also won exactly 54 percent of his points. And when Carlos Alcaraz defeated Jannik Sinner on Sunday in the French Open final — in one of the greatest matches since the 2008 Wimbledon final — Alcaraz, the champion, actually won one fewer point than Sinner.

It’s an easy concept to apply to almost any field. In 2022, Ronald van Loon, a portfolio manager at BlackRock, authored a paper on the percentage of investment decisions that need to be correct to beat market benchmarks for returns. He researched markets, crunched the numbers and came up with a number: As low as 53 percent.
https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6392045/2025/05/30/michael-kosta-comedian-tennis-losing-stand-up/
Michael Kosta, a rotating host of The Daily Show on Comedy Central and a former professional tennis player, viewed the clip through the lens of a standup comedian. Federer may have only won 54 percent of his points, Kosta said, but he always seemed to win the points that mattered most.

“He always brought his best at the right time,” Kosta said. “And that’s an important part of comedy, too. You can have a rough five minutes in your set. You can lose the audience. But as long as you get them back by the end, I think that’s kind of most important.”

Which set up Federer’s final lesson: Life is bigger than the court.

The graduates before him would be record-breakers and world travelers, leaders and philanthropists. In other words, they were going places, and if they ever saw him in the future, he said, they should say hi.

As Federer concluded his speech in the rain, he finished up his “tennis lessons” and pivoted to something fun — a real tennis lesson. He stood on stage and clutched a racket in his hand, suggested an Eastern grip and showcased the proper placement for your knuckles, which, he said, should allow for easy switching from forehand to backhand.

0/2025/06/10/roger-federer-viral-commencement-speech/
Great lessons of life and competition. Thanks for sharing this and enjoy a great New Year, my friend.
 
Coaches are fired all the time with winning records

Mark Stoops at Kentucky was the programs all time winningest coach
Jimbo Fisher at Texas A&M
Brian Kelly at LSU
James Franklin at Penn St
Mike Gundy at OK St (170-90)

This is aging as well as its hard to beat the same team twice in a season bullshit! LOL
 
BS. No coach in the world would be fired for 13-2 seasons. NONE. And playoffs ever year. And semis and champ game 2 out of 3. Few people in the world would make dumb comments like you do.
And for being responsible for selling 19,737 season ticket packages (sold out), highest number in school history and more than any Mountain West team, more than WSU, Oregon State… Also sold out the stadium every game until playoffs.
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
 
And for being responsible for selling 19,737 season ticket packages (sold out), highest number in school history and more than any Mountain West team, more than WSU, Oregon State… Also sold out the stadium every game until playoffs.
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Spoken like a fan who had a great Festivus this year. Great post!
 
Coaches are fired all the time with winning records

Mark Stoops at Kentucky was the programs all time winningest coach
Jimbo Fisher at Texas A&M
Brian Kelly at LSU
James Franklin at Penn St
Mike Gundy at OK St (170-90)

This is aging as well as its hard to beat the same team twice in a season bullshit! LOL
13-2 records. No one said anything about winning records. Are you that dumb, or just not paying attention?
 
I think that the idea of firing a coach that went 13-2 in a season and got his team to the semifinals is odd. I do think it is acceptable to question some obvious deficiencies as Andrew Schmidt has. Regardless of how good a team is there are always areas for improvement, it’s naive to assume otherwise or to assume the coaches aren’t looking at those areas as well.
 
Coaches are fired all the time with winning records

Mark Stoops at Kentucky was the programs all time winningest coach
Jimbo Fisher at Texas A&M
Brian Kelly at LSU
James Franklin at Penn St
Mike Gundy at OK St (170-90)

This is aging as well as its hard to beat the same team twice in a season bullshit! LOL
Bobby isn't getting fired and he shouldn't because outside of MSU we had a great season, that is a basic fact. Most teams would kill for a 13-2 record with a Semi final appearance at any level of CFB.

At the same time however we absolutely need to make some changes if we want to get over the hump (beating MSU, winning Road Playoff games etc.) and unfortunately I don't know if Bobby and Co. will do anything that needs to be done.
 
BS. No coach in the world would be fired for 13-2 seasons. NONE. And playoffs ever year. And semis and champ game 2 out of 3. Few people in the world would make dumb comments like you do.
Never called for him to be fired. This is just one of your typical geriatric deflection tactics to avoid taking accountability for your boyfriend’s track record.

Bobby set the on-field priorities for the program when he was hired:

1. Beat the Cats
2. Win the Big Sky
3. Win Natties

These are his standards, not mine. The simple reality is that Bobby is a failure by his own metrics (3 for 21) and there’s no amount of mental gymnastics that can change that.

Why would we renew a coach that doesn’t live up to his own self-prescribed standards?
 
Never called for him to be fired. This is just one of your typical geriatric deflection tactics to avoid taking accountability for your boyfriend’s track record.

Bobby set the on-field priorities for the program when he was hired:

1. Beat the Cats
2. Win the Big Sky
3. Win Natties

These are his standards, not mine. The simple reality is that Bobby is a failure by his own metrics (3 for 21) and there’s no amount of mental gymnastics that can change that.

Why would we renew a coach that doesn’t live up to his own self-prescribed standards?
It seems that there are 2 sides, the "Bobby can't do wrong" and "Fire Bobby now" crowd and very few people wanting to actually have a discussion and fix the problems we have which is somewhere in the middle.

Bobby shouldn't be fired (he has 1 year left on his contract) but things like Defensive scheme and Coordinators, recruiting strategy, strength and conditioning etc. absolutely need to be addressed and tough decisions made.
 
Bobby isn't getting fired and he shouldn't because outside of MSU we had a great season, that is a basic fact. Most teams would kill for a 13-2 record with a Semi final appearance at any level of CFB.

At the same time however we absolutely need to make some changes if we want to get over the hump (beating MSU, winning Road Playoff games etc.) and unfortunately I don't know if Bobby and Co. will do anything that needs to be done.
This is the best perspective on here and the one that I think the majority of Griz Nation shares. Bobby's a good coach and there is zero justifiable reason to fire him after a 13 win season. That being said, there are things that need to change with him and the program as a whole if we're going to get over the hump. Next year is going to be a big year for him. He can either exorcise the demons and lead us to the promise land, or he can maintain the status quo and we can have a similar finish to the season that we had this year. The ball is in his court. What will he do with it?
 
This is the best perspective on here and the one that I think the majority of Griz Nation shares. Bobby's a good coach and there is zero justifiable reason to fire him after a 13 win season. That being said, there are things that need to change with him and the program as a whole if we're going to get over the hump. Next year is going to be a big year for him. He can either exorcise the demons and lead us to the promise land, or he can maintain the status quo and we can have a similar finish to the season that we had this year. The ball is in his court. What will he do with it?
I agree, I’m just extremely skeptical that Bobby is either willing or capable of the type of significant, responsive change that is necessary.

Love or hate him, it’s undeniable that some of his core features as a human being are loyalty to a fault and a stubborn unwillingness to change.

The thought that he’d be willing to scrap the 3-3-5, which is clearly an enormous issue, seems far fetched at best. And even if he did, it’s seems extremely unlikely that he’d be able to build a defense that is replacing 9 starters in an single season into one that can stop the Cats & Dakota States of world.

The in-state recruiting issue is a systemic one that is going to take a sea change on both a philosophical and staff level. Recruiting is a young man’s game and this staff clearly needs some youth to reinvigorate its efforts. Prioritizing winning the top recruits in the state would give us a nice foundation for depth that we are currently missing in a big way. Would also love to see the recruiting relationship with Sentinel repaired, so that we don’t have to watch kids from our literal backyard killing us in the Brawl every year.

I’d love to see Bobby make these kind of changes to get us over the hump, I just highly doubt he is capable of it based on his prior resume.
 
Back
Top