HikeGlacier
Well-known member
Special teams was difference once again. Get Bobby out of here.
special teams made the difference—coached by Bobby.A Few plays on either side of the ball could have made the difference.
You only blame the special teams all the time because you have a hard on for Bobby.special teams made the difference—coached by Bobby.
My take…we couldn’t keep the D-line off of Ah Yat long enough to let longer pass plays develop. That’s why after the 4 sacks in the 1st quarter EVERY pass was a 5-yard out.I have a question for some of you folks that know football: why did we not once throw the long ball? I suppose the first t d to Davis might just barely be called a long ball but to my recollection that was our only long ball attempt of the day. Why?
I never said those words...yes - the pick six was awful.The scats offense scored 24 points. Their lowest conference output by far. Our O scored 28.
The pick six was entirely the difference. That and the holding call on the TD.
This game in no way falls on the defense. Sure they couldn’t get a stop AT THE END, but they did fine all day, relatively to literally anyone else the ‘scats have played.
He's a stud.Lamson played his ass off. That sure didn't help. He was particularly effective. Not sure if it was an outlier or the norm.
Their d-line was mostly as advertised. Their o-line was also excellent - especially when it mattered at the end of the game. Davis is a stud.My take…we couldn’t keep the D-line off of Ah Yat long enough to let longer pass plays develop. That’s why after the 4 sacks in the 1st quarter EVERY pass was a 5-yard out.
Take no offense HHB because I’ve heard the expression used like this a lot. But if someone has disdain for someone else, isn’t that the opposite of having a hard-on for them?You only blame the special teams all the time because you have a hard on for Bobby.
Or an unhealthy infatuationTake no offense HHB because I’ve heard the expression used like this a lot. But if someone has disdain for someone else, isn’t that the opposite of having a hard-on for them?
One blocked FG? ST wasn't the difference. Cats making more plays than Griz was the difference. An easy pick 6. A bad holding call bringing back a TD. Their QB throwing and running well. Had nothing to do with ST's. The coach doesn't do the kicking. The kick would have been good. The defender made a huge leap and play.Special teams was difference once again. Get Bobby out of here.
I wasn't overly impressed with their DL. Their 2 pre-season all-conference guys had 2 tackles a piece and 1 sack between them. No. 41 is overrated. The Cat OL gave up 4 sacks, I believe. UM OL gave up 2 sacks.Their d-line was mostly as advertised. Their o-line was also excellent - especially when it mattered at the end of the game. Davis is a stud.
They have championship caliber lines...not yet sure the Griz do...we'll see.
True. Ay Yat rifled the ball on a fairly short pass. Ball seemed to hit the receiver in the chest before he could get his hands triggered.Tipped pass happened because QB threw a 90 mph short pass.
True. Ay Yat rifled the ball on a fairly short pass. Ball seemed to hit the receiver in the chest before he could get his hands triggered.
scats were playing cover 2 (2 deep safeties) and their corners were 7-10 yards off the Griz outside wide receivers. We could have gone deep with a likely interception but why go deep when they are giving you 5-7 yards every throw.I have a question for some of you folks that know football: why did we not once throw the long ball? I suppose the first t d to Davis might just barely be called a long ball but to my recollection that was our only long ball attempt of the day. Why?
They were playing with two high safeties the entire game. Not that they shouldn't have tried more deep shots but their cover 2 zone is tough to throw the deep vertical route.I have a question for some of you folks that know football: why did we not once throw the long ball? I suppose the first t d to Davis might just barely be called a long ball but to my recollection that was our only long ball attempt of the day. Why?
Yup, I agree.They were playing with two high safeties the entire game. Not that they shouldn't have tried more deep shots but their cover 2 zone is tough to throw the deep vertical route.
The defender that was run off Montana for character problems. Fits in well there.One blocked FG? ST wasn't the difference. Cats making more plays than Griz was the difference. An easy pick 6. A bad holding call bringing back a TD. Their QB throwing and running well. Had nothing to do with ST's. The coach doesn't do the kicking. The kick would have been good. The defender made a huge leap and play.
My take…we couldn’t keep the D-line off of Ah Yat long enough to let longer pass plays develop. That’s why after the 4 sacks in the 1st quarter EVERY pass was a 5-yard out.
100% agree on #41. Dude is sloooooooow.I wasn't overly impressed with their DL. Their 2 pre-season all-conference guys had 2 tackles a piece and 1 sack between them. No. 41 is overrated. The Cat OL gave up 4 sacks, I believe. UM OL gave up 2 sacks.
Gillman is a much better back than Davis, but Davis is good.