As we all know, due to conference scheduling imbalances, some teams don't face the top contenders in a given year. Occasionally, like in 2019, the best teams all play each other, creating a fun title race between the best of the best. Other, more frequent times (e.g., 2015 SUU, 2022 msu/SAC), teams benefit from avoiding strong opponents. Even non-title contenders (like NAU last year) can inflate their records with weaker schedules.
This isn’t a complaint—just an observation, and I wanted to look at the schedules this season to get an idea of who might benefit from playing fewer of the perceived stronger teams.
This is my own criteria, and people may disagree, but that's part of the fun. I consider these teams to be the top potential 5 right now that are legit playoff contenders:
cats
Montana
Sac State
Davis
Idaho
Weber, Idaho State and NAU were honorable mention, but I can't really make a case for any of the other teams. For this exercise, I left them all out of the top teams (because I don't think they will be).
Based on this, the team that has the WORST schedule in the conference is Idaho State: They play 4 of the top 5 teams (msu, UM, UCD, and Idaho), with 3 of those games (msu, UCD, Idaho) all on the road.
The team with the EASIEST schedule is...........
The neighbors lol did you think it would be anyone else?
The cats play just 2 of the other top teams (UM, UCD), and only the game against us is on the road. They do have a potential trap game @ NAU, but the rest of their schedule should be a walk in the park.
The Griz, thankfully, don't have too difficult a slate, even though we play Sac, msu, and Idaho--only one of those games is an away contest. Sac is in a similar boat, with only one away game against the other top teams. Idaho and UC Davis play 3 of the other top teams, with 2 of those games on the road each.
Throughout the season, I'll come back to this thread and take stock of which teams avoided top teams, especially if something crazy happens, and teams we don't consider contenders somehow step up. I may even make a Google doc where people can pick their own top teams and see how the schedules' difficulty changes. Here is the number of top teams each school plays based on my top team assumptions for the whole conference:
*Top team
If I somehow made any mistakes in this, please let me know, I did this in between work, and may have gotten some things wrong.
This isn’t a complaint—just an observation, and I wanted to look at the schedules this season to get an idea of who might benefit from playing fewer of the perceived stronger teams.
This is my own criteria, and people may disagree, but that's part of the fun. I consider these teams to be the top potential 5 right now that are legit playoff contenders:
cats
Montana
Sac State
Davis
Idaho
Weber, Idaho State and NAU were honorable mention, but I can't really make a case for any of the other teams. For this exercise, I left them all out of the top teams (because I don't think they will be).
Based on this, the team that has the WORST schedule in the conference is Idaho State: They play 4 of the top 5 teams (msu, UM, UCD, and Idaho), with 3 of those games (msu, UCD, Idaho) all on the road.
The team with the EASIEST schedule is...........
The neighbors lol did you think it would be anyone else?
The cats play just 2 of the other top teams (UM, UCD), and only the game against us is on the road. They do have a potential trap game @ NAU, but the rest of their schedule should be a walk in the park.
The Griz, thankfully, don't have too difficult a slate, even though we play Sac, msu, and Idaho--only one of those games is an away contest. Sac is in a similar boat, with only one away game against the other top teams. Idaho and UC Davis play 3 of the other top teams, with 2 of those games on the road each.
Throughout the season, I'll come back to this thread and take stock of which teams avoided top teams, especially if something crazy happens, and teams we don't consider contenders somehow step up. I may even make a Google doc where people can pick their own top teams and see how the schedules' difficulty changes. Here is the number of top teams each school plays based on my top team assumptions for the whole conference:
*Top team
| Team | Home games against top teams | Away games against top teams |
| msu | 1 - (UCD) | 1 - (UM) |
| UM | 2 - (msu, IDAHO) | 1 - (SAC) |
| SAC | 2 - (UM, IDAHO) | 1 - (UCD) |
| IDAHO | 1 - (UCD) | 2 - (UM, SAC) |
| UCD | 1 - (SAC) | 2 - (msu, IDAHO) |
| CP | 2 - (msu, UCD) | 2 - (UM, SAC) |
| ISU | 1 - (UM) | 3 - (msu, UCD, IDAHO) |
| WEB | 2 - (UM, SAC) | 2 - (msu, UCD) |
| EWU | 2 - (SAC IDAHO) | 2 - (UM, msu) |
| PSU | 2 - (UM, SAC) | 1 - (IDAHO) |
| UNC | 2 - (msu, UCD) | 2 - (SAC, IDAHO) |
| NAU | 2 - (msu, IDAHO) | 1 - (UCD) |
If I somehow made any mistakes in this, please let me know, I did this in between work, and may have gotten some things wrong.