markson161
Well-known member
34-28 Griz
Can you answer my question to what makes Marion’s Go-Go Offense go? What’s he do differently that’s given him credit for being so innovative?
It utilizes a lot of Triple Option and Wing-T concepts with a modern twist, in particular to how the O-Line blocks and alot of Shotgun formations.
The Go-Go offense is a modern, fast-paced offensive football scheme that blends elements of traditional power football with spread concepts, often out of two-back shotgun formations. It was developed by Brennan Marion, a former college coach who made the scheme famous while coordinating record-breaking offenses at smaller programs like Howard University.
Key Characteristics of the Go-Go Offense:
- Two Running Backs in the Backfield
- Unlike most spread offenses that use one running back, the Go-Go consistently keeps two backs in the backfield.
- Backs are often aligned side-by-side or slightly staggered, giving the offense multiple run/pass threats on both sides of the formation.
- Shotgun Formation
- The quarterback lines up in shotgun, but the offense still emphasizes the run game—a blend of zone reads, power runs, and RPOs (run-pass options).
- Tempo and Misdirection
- High-paced tempo is used to wear down defenses.
- Motion, fakes, and deception are used to keep defenses off-balance, particularly with jet motions and play-action looks.
- Power + Spread Hybrid
- Combines downhill running with wide formations and vertical passing concepts.
- It's not purely finesse like some Air Raid schemes; it incorporates physical blocking and gap-scheme runs.
- Creative Formations & Pre-Snap Movement
- Frequent use of motion and unorthodox alignments to disguise intentions and stress defensive assignments.
- Sometimes includes stacked receivers, compressed sets, or unbalanced lines.
How It's Different from Other Offenses:
Offense Backfield Focus Key Traits Go-Go 2 RBs Balanced (run + pass) Tempo, misdirection, versatility Spread 1 RB Pass-first Wide formations, fast tempo Air Raid 1 RB Heavy pass 4-5 WRs, quick throws Pro-Style 1-2 RBs + FB/TE Balanced Under center, play-action, varied personnel Wing-T/Option 2-3 backs Run-heavy Misleading motions, pulling linemen
Why It Works:
- Confuses defenses by forcing them to prepare for both power runs and modern passing schemes.
- Creates mismatches, especially with motion and dual-back threats.
- Maximizes talent, particularly when there are multiple capable backs or hybrid athletes.
Notable Usage:
- Howard University (2017): Brennan Marion’s offense upset UNLV 43–40 as a 45-point underdog—the biggest point-spread upset in college football history.
- Has since influenced college programs and some NFL wrinkles (e.g., Ravens with Lamar Jackson occasionally use similar two-back shotgun sets).
It utilizes a lot of Triple Option and Wing-T concepts with a modern twist, in particular to how the O-Line blocks and alot of Shotgun formations.
The co
The complexities of learning these blocking schemes and doing it as a cohesive unit can be difficult. They won’t be running on all cylinders to start the year. I could some stumbles early then when they reach familiarity and trust with each other it could take off to another level. Regardless of how good the offense is, if the defense doesn’t provide the support you end up with how EWU looked with EB at QB. Lots of scoring, but giving up lots of scoring and always in questionable barn burner games.
That's why you watch film. Right now the coaches have 2 years of UNLV film they can watch and then they'll have about 7 games of Sac State they can watch. It's not like defending the triple option.I do have concerns regarding the ability to put together a scout team that can adequately depict the Go Go offense so the defense can see a realistic version and make adjustments during preparation for the game.
I think it's safe to say none of the payers and/or coaches have tried to defend it.
It starts and ends in the trenches.Actually, it is exactly like defending a non-typical form of the triple option...and that's only one component that the defense will have to deal with. I'm going to suggest that you go watch some of that readily available film you speak of.
Yep, we should just forfeit the game. “We” don’t stand a chance.Actually, it is exactly like defending a non-typical form of the triple option...and that's only one component that the defense will have to deal with. I'm going to suggest that you go watch some of that readily available film you speak of.
I'm not suggesting that Sac State will win. I was just attempting to point out that the preparation for that game will be atypical.Yep, we should just forfeit the game. “We” don’t stand a chance.
Prophetic. Did you make that up on your own?It starts and ends in the trenches.