HelenaHandBasket
Well-known member
He is an egotistical creeper.And why exactly is he using an IP address to geolocate?
He is an egotistical creeper.And why exactly is he using an IP address to geolocate?
I asked him the same thing.And why exactly is he using an IP address to geolocate?
This is like step one of becoming an internet stalker, I think. When he fails to threaten you as a poster he moves to try and find your real identity. No great.I asked him the same thing.
He said so he could track down the poster and stop the poster from defaming his online persona.
Classic narcissistic response to being challenged.
Be careful, you might make his list too.
![]()
I said no such thing. The internet stockers are people like you two. Just following my name around egriz. Commenting, making up stuff and telling lies. As I have said before, anyone who starts saying narcissism and making other diagnoses on the internet shows that they don't know what they are talking about and likely have serious problems themselves.I asked him the same thing.
He said so he could track down the poster and stop the poster from defaming his online persona.
Classic narcissistic response to being challenged.
Be careful, you might make his list too.
![]()
No such thing, eh?I said no such thing.
Your posts:He said so he could track down the poster and stop the poster from defaming his online persona.
Nope. None of my life has been about DEI.
Why do you keep this up? I think I will get PI to track you down. Be careful. Watch your IP addresses.
Track him down for what purpose?
To put a top to his lies and his defamatory comments. They are actionable. Should I put you on the list too?
"No such thing, eh?
Let’s take a look.
I paraphrased what you said as:
Your posts:
I mean … you did say “top to,” but I was pretty sure you meant “stop to.”
Anyway, @GrizRealist, I think you get the picture about hoops.
No, I meant what I said.No such thing, eh?
Let’s take a look.
I paraphrased what you said as:
Your posts:
I mean … you did say “top to,” but I was pretty sure you meant “stop to.”
Anyway, @GrizRealist, I think you get the picture about hoops.
Sometimes egos and politics get involved and it becomes obvious to the observer despite what the coach says publicly.Why do some fans think they know more than coaches?
I think it usually because fans don't know much about football, if anything. You are a prime example of that.Sometimes egos and politics get involved and it becomes obvious to the observer despite what the coach says publicly.
This is the way.Your offensive line play has hindered QB development as much as hauck screwing around with the rotation, i think. Teams can throw a lot of looks at your QBs because they can get home with 4 so often. You need line play like you had for eternity before Bob Stitt. I remember well how dominant those lines were for eternity. Fix that and your QBs will magically develop better. IMO.
Maybe not but fans know how to count wins and losses.I think it usually because fans don't know much about football, if anything. You are a prime example of that.
This isn’t accurate. Most people coming into this season said “with the talent we have at skill positions coming into this season ANYONE could play quarterback and we’d have a deep playoff run”I don't think Fife was much better than Ah Yat and Ah Yat has more years of eligibility. I think everyone knew this years team had glaring weaknesses and wasn't making a deep playoff run. Fife sealed his fate with his twitter post and calling out Hauck. Hauck did what any coach would have done and what any of the smarter egriz posters would have done.
Hoops is actually right on this one. Almost every AD only cares that the money is still coming in. That’s their number one priority. And for Montana it is. (See indoor facility).And as AD he doesn’t know football or influence football decisions. The top boosters like and support Bobby more Haslam. Haslam is an administrator and caretaker of a good program. In many programs, the coach is much bigger than the AD. In most programs, the AD doesn’t go against the top boosters. If the coach no longer has strong support from top boosters, then the dynamics are different from what I have said.
not at the start of the play offsThis isn’t accurate. Most people coming into this season said “with the talent we have at skill positions coming into this season ANYONE could play quarterback and we’d have a deep playoff run”
That was actually the general consensus
Because cash has become king in college football, public relations has become a much bigger piece of building a top tier program. Whenever you’re asking for money, you must, to some extent, put on your tap shoes. That is unless you’re going to solely rely on the “big boosters” that you already have in your pocket.Hoops is actually right on this one. Almost every AD only cares that the money is still coming in. That’s their number one priority. And for Montana it is. (See indoor facility).
A good AD could work with the coach to fix the public perception of the program and in turn help out maybe getting recruits with things like positive media and social media relationships. That Haslam very much could coordinate. But I think he like Bobby is not good in those arenas.
Never been truer statement. Kant is a baseball guy and doesn’t know sht about football.And as AD he doesn’t know football or influence football decisions. The top boosters like and support Bobby more Haslam. Haslam is an administrator and caretaker of a good program. In many programs, the coach is much bigger than the AD. In most programs, the AD doesn’t go against the top boosters. If the coach no longer has strong support from top boosters, then the dynamics are different from what I have said.