• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

2024 FCS Opening Game Schedule of Interest

No team in the country that I know of is scheduling games two levels below...
Idaho State did back early in the new millennium. First home game against that powerhouse Western Montana Bulldogs. Attended by about 4,500. Game was actually fairly close until the fourth quarter.

But, that was then, this is now. I don't think the lessons of App St at Michigan's 'Big House' or Griz at UDub have been lost on schedulers. Players and fans certainly haven't forgotten...
 
Idaho State did back early in the new millennium. First home game against that powerhouse Western Montana Bulldogs. Attended by about 4,500. Game was actually fairly close until the fourth quarter.

But, that was then, this is now. I don't think the lessons of App St at Michigan's 'Big House' or Griz at UDub have been lost on schedulers. Players and fans certainly haven't forgotten...
That's true. And western played Weber back around 08 or 09. They looked great on the first drive, and then it got rough. Bit for one drive, there was hope.

Honestly the attendance numbers are important, but I would also be concerned lack of playoff implications, the way it doesn't help the overall team prepare, and the risk of injury to kids that were not close to the fcs level. To be quite honest, though, I don't know that I would even go to that game.
 
You know there's nothing like live game play.You can't simulate that.If some of our quaterbacks would have had it we would sure be a lot better when it matters
To your point, I'm not trying to be overly disagreeable, and your general point is well taken.

I think we did see the staff getting Ah Yat some time back there when the situation allowed and I hope they keep doing that with him or with others if Ah Yat wins the starting job. I agree that it is great to get the young guns reps. You are totally right in that way, I just disagree with scheduling a game for it.
 
That's true. And western played Weber back around 08 or 09. They looked great on the first drive, and then it got rough. Bit for one drive, there was hope.

Honestly the attendance numbers are important, but I would also be concerned lack of playoff implications, the way it doesn't help the overall team prepare, and the risk of injury to kids that were not close to the fcs level. To be quite honest, though, I don't know that I would even go to that game.
No playoff considerations, it was Idaho State. And, it was in Pocatello, where entertainment is...I'm drawing a blank in the analogy department here. Sorry.
 
So you do not think that anyone would come watch say Carrol or Montana Tech play the Griz ? I am not talking Ferris State. My take is we are not getting the reps for people like Ah YAT or others in live play enought to make them game ready.How else could you do it?
Your take is piss poor. Also, why do you think game reps against a NAIA school are better than practice reps against the Griz second and third team?
 
I know it's the coaches job to figure out who is ready but do you think that teams loose good players because they are not developed yet and move on because they see very little if any play time.I think it happens more than you might know.
 
because there is no crowd - there is no action- no excitement - just another day of practice
Well old, they can't afford to play a game that has no chance to be a playoff counter, and that is what a game against a NAIA school would be. It is a losing proposition for the program more so than the possible play time for the bottom of the roster.
 
I know it's the coaches job to figure out who is ready but do you think that teams loose good players because they are not developed yet and move on because they see very little if any play time.I think it happens more than you might know.
Teams will lose players for numerous reasons, and the guys you suggesting would be pretty low on the list to accommodate.
 
No playoff considerations, it was Idaho State. And, it was in Pocatello, where entertainment is...I'm drawing a blank in the analogy department here. Sorry.
Oh, totally. I meant our playoff implications this year if we scheduled it. I took a tangent.
 
Oh, totally. I meant our playoff implications this year if we scheduled it. I took a tangent.
Agreed. Scheduling a NAIA team has no upside.
I did, however, come up with an appropriate analogy for Pocatello entertainment: Soft Vanilla Ice Cream, preferably on a cone. Big seller at ISU football games, along with nachos. Not a slam, just descriptive of life in The Gate City area.
 
Last edited:
This may have been posted and discussed previously but since we're taking about scheduling... Next year the Griz have eight home games, with four in a row to start the season, one of which is against D2 Central Washington. The other non- conference games aren't too bad, with UND and Indiana State coming to Msla for the back end of their home and homes. I don't love playing D2s but you can't knock the revenue, especially considering how the cost of the NCAA settlement will affect FCS teams.

 
This may have been posted and discussed previously but since we're taking about scheduling... Next year the Griz have eight home games, with four in a row to start the season, one of which is against D2 Central Washington. The other non- conference games aren't too bad, with UND and Indiana State coming to Msla for the back end of their home and homes. I don't love playing D2s but you can't knock the revenue, especially considering how the cost of the NCAA settlement will affect FCS teams.

Every single time since 2001 that we've been to the NC game, except for 2004, we've played a D2 team, and last year just added to that trend (although UNC in 2004 was in their first year being D1, so they were basically a D2 team).

People should be STOKED every year we play a D2 team, now. lol
 
I know it's the coaches job to figure out who is ready but do you think that teams loose good players because they are not developed yet and move on because they see very little if any play time.I think it happens more than you might know.
Loose good players?
 
Every single time since 2001 that we've been to the NC game, except for 2004, we've played a D2 team, and last year just added to that trend (although UNC in 2004 was in their first year being D1, so they were basically a D2 team).

People should be STOKED every year we play a D2 team, now. lol
Wow good point. 😁
 
So how would you suggest we get the younger quarterbacks more playing time to get them experience?IMO it should happen in the first non conference games but its all about winning so that would never happen unless it was 70 to nothing.Then we would be playing the bench and so would other teams.
 
So how would you suggest we get the younger quarterbacks more playing time to get them experience?IMO it should happen in the first non conference games but its all about winning so that would never happen unless it was 70 to nothing.Then we would be playing the bench and so would other teams.
The same way every other team in the nation does. Develop them in practice and the off season. What teams do you see out there that are scheduling easy opponents two levels down so that their young QB can get a start? It seems like it would waste an opportunity for all of the current starters to get tuned up going into the season. I'm not trying to be mean to you, but it seems like you are pretending that it is abnormal to develop a young QB in practice. That is how teams do it.

Also, to answer a previous question of yours about money, I just read this about MSU taking a "money" game to go up against New Mexico. "The Cats will open the 2024 season at New Mexico on Aug. 24, and they'll receive $360,000 from the Lobos, who compete in the Football Bowl Subdivision (the highest level of college football)."

We make a lot more than that by staying home and playing a team like Indiana State.
 
Back
Top