Thanks Brint. I sent the following to the committee:
Pat Williams attempted to influence the outcome of a criminal trial. He also used a broad brush to paint all football players as thugs. He may now claim that’s not what he was doing but that’s exactly the way it appeared. When he had an opportunity to clarify himself ... after the backlash to his statements became widespread, he merely repeated himself. This ... from a man who understands how to shape perceptions.
If Pat Williams was only concerned about the football program having gone in wrong directions, why didn’t he acknowledge to the national press all the changes the university had already made (personnel terminations, new disciplinary policies, general and athletic student sexual misconduct awareness , etc.)? As a regent representing the university system, that would have been the appropriate thing to do. One can only assume its football in general that truly disturbs him.
We all recognize the primary goal of the university system ... the higher education of our citizens. My fear is Pat Williams does not see the value that sports add to that goal (keeping alumni involved, student athletic scholarships, pride in your university, etc.).
Please do not confirm Pat Williams as a regent to the board.