Colter_Nuanez56
Well-known member
Lady Griz battle Idaho State but Bengals advance
http://skylinesportsmt.com/lady-griz-battle-idaho-state-but-bengals-advance/
http://skylinesportsmt.com/lady-griz-battle-idaho-state-but-bengals-advance/
GrizLA said:grizzlyjournal said:HelenaHandBasket said:journal, they shot poorly all season. They were dead last in shooting and scoring in the conference. We will see how much better they shoot next season, but I would just hope for average.
You're correct. There's no guarantee at this point that their shooting will improve into the mid 40s (where a team needs to shoot to be a winner).
Nonetheless, I saw dramatic improvement in team floor play, defense and rebounding over the last 8-10 games. I believe they'll be competitive in the Big Sky next season. They were primarily a freshman team that had to play tough games as they learned how to play D1 ball. I believe they did pretty well and cite their win over Idaho State last Friday as proof. If they start next season using that game as a compass, I believe they'll be a top 4 Big Sky Conf. team next year.
I admire your optimism, but that is a low bar, indeed. This team was simply not good, judging from their record and this game. That they won as many games as they did, shows a lot of heart but......
EverettGriz said:Look!!! lala is spewing negativity about a Griz BB program. Why, that's completely different....
GrizLA said:grizzlyjournal said:HelenaHandBasket said:journal, they shot poorly all season. They were dead last in shooting and scoring in the conference. We will see how much better they shoot next season, but I would just hope for average.
You're correct. There's no guarantee at this point that their shooting will improve into the mid 40s (where a team needs to shoot to be a winner).
Nonetheless, I saw dramatic improvement in team floor play, defense and rebounding over the last 8-10 games. I believe they'll be competitive in the Big Sky next season. They were primarily a freshman team that had to play tough games as they learned how to play D1 ball. I believe they did pretty well and cite their win over Idaho State last Friday as proof. If they start next season using that game as a compass, I believe they'll be a top 4 Big Sky Conf. team next year.
I admire your optimism, but that is a low bar, indeed. This team was simply not good, judging from their record and this game. That they won as many games as they did, shows a lot of heart but......
westsider said:They will NEVER dominate like they did for many years. I think the rest of the league has caught up to the Lady Griz, and just because they had injuries and youth this year, does not guarantee they will be a top 4 team next year. Other teams are recruiting just as well as Montana.
grizzlyjournal said:GrizLA said:grizzlyjournal said:HelenaHandBasket said:journal, they shot poorly all season. They were dead last in shooting and scoring in the conference. We will see how much better they shoot next season, but I would just hope for average.
You're correct. There's no guarantee at this point that their shooting will improve into the mid 40s (where a team needs to shoot to be a winner).
Nonetheless, I saw dramatic improvement in team floor play, defense and rebounding over the last 8-10 games. I believe they'll be competitive in the Big Sky next season. They were primarily a freshman team that had to play tough games as they learned how to play D1 ball. I believe they did pretty well and cite their win over Idaho State last Friday as proof. If they start next season using that game as a compass, I believe they'll be a top 4 Big Sky Conf. team next year.
I admire your optimism, but that is a low bar, indeed. This team was simply not good, judging from their record and this game. That they won as many games as they did, shows a lot of heart but......
I THINK I understand some of your references, GrizLA. If it's important to criticize a team composed almost entirely of freshmen, I'll go along with you and admit that this team wasn't very good for much of the year. By the last three weeks and, in particular, last weekend, however, they had demonstrated on-court ability to compete with most teams in the Big Sky. On a broader national level, that still doesn't place them on a par with a lot of west coast teams. For now, I say "so what?" But there's more to examine.
New Griz coach, Shannon Schweyen, took over this team last August... AFTER all incoming recruits had committed. Then, she had to hire a staff, one of whom came on board and left a week later for a better paying job. Calling her first-year job a challenge was an understatement. All that took place before her two returning senior starters went down.
I watched this team closely this year. This young group just STARTED to get an understanding of Schweyen's program (with the assistance of Eric Hays, Mike Petrino and Sonya Stokken) by late January. I personally think it's unfair to judge Schweyen's first year without acknowledging the transitional barriers. In essence, she's just now going into her first full year as a coach. This spring will be the first time she'll be able to look at her program and roster as actually her own program.
And this year will be her actual FIRST year to begin recruiting to her own program. So, the best signs of this team's future will start slowly shaping up sometime over the next 5 months. I'm following that with interest myself. What kind of players will be her first recruits? Will Hays stick around for another year? Will Schweyen start inserting her own unique schemes on offense and defense (Yes, because we've already seen numerous signs of that).
Robin Selvig was an outstanding coach, very unique in D1 basketball... especially over the past few years. I can't make any predictions, but I believe Schweyen will be making changes that will have an impact (I do NOT want this construed as criticism of Selvig) on this program. I think those changes will result in a Lady Griz style of game that'll be much faster paced. What I see so far I really like.
But, getting back to this "bad" team, as you put it. I am not setting the bar low. But I am emphasizing that this program where it stands today, and its coach, cannot really be judged for another 2-3 years. We may see some signs next year, but probably won't see the evolution of the Montana women's program under SS for another 2-3 years. Then we can discuss whether the bar set for Montana women's basketball is in need of being raised a few notches.
grizzlyjournal said:GrizLA said:grizzlyjournal said:HelenaHandBasket said:journal, they shot poorly all season. They were dead last in shooting and scoring in the conference. We will see how much better they shoot next season, but I would just hope for average.
You're correct. There's no guarantee at this point that their shooting will improve into the mid 40s (where a team needs to shoot to be a winner).
Nonetheless, I saw dramatic improvement in team floor play, defense and rebounding over the last 8-10 games. I believe they'll be competitive in the Big Sky next season. They were primarily a freshman team that had to play tough games as they learned how to play D1 ball. I believe they did pretty well and cite their win over Idaho State last Friday as proof. If they start next season using that game as a compass, I believe they'll be a top 4 Big Sky Conf. team next year.
I admire your optimism, but that is a low bar, indeed. This team was simply not good, judging from their record and this game. That they won as many games as they did, shows a lot of heart but......
I THINK I understand some of your references, GrizLA. If it's important to criticize a team composed almost entirely of freshmen, I'll go along with you and admit that this team wasn't very good for much of the year. By the last three weeks and, in particular, last weekend, however, they had demonstrated on-court ability to compete with most teams in the Big Sky. On a broader national level, that still doesn't place them on a par with a lot of west coast teams. For now, I say "so what?" But there's more to examine.
New Griz coach, Shannon Schweyen, took over this team last August... AFTER all incoming recruits had committed. Then, she had to hire a staff, one of whom came on board and left a week later for a better paying job. Calling her first-year job a challenge was an understatement. All that took place before her two returning senior starters went down.
I watched this team closely this year. This young group just STARTED to get an understanding of Schweyen's program (with the assistance of Eric Hays, Mike Petrino and Sonya Stokken) by late January. I personally think it's unfair to judge Schweyen's first year without acknowledging the transitional barriers. In essence, she's just now going into her first full year as a coach. This spring will be the first time she'll be able to look at her program and roster as actually her own program.
And this year will be her actual FIRST year to begin recruiting to her own program. So, the best signs of this team's future will start slowly shaping up sometime over the next 5 months. I'm following that with interest myself. What kind of players will be her first recruits? Will Hays stick around for another year? Will Schweyen start inserting her own unique schemes on offense and defense (Yes, because we've already seen numerous signs of that).
Robin Selvig was an outstanding coach, very unique in D1 basketball... especially over the past few years. I can't make any predictions, but I believe Schweyen will be making changes that will have an impact (I do NOT want this construed as criticism of Selvig) on this program. I think those changes will result in a Lady Griz style of game that'll be much faster paced. What I see so far I really like.
But, getting back to this "bad" team, as you put it. I am not setting the bar low. But I am emphasizing that this program where it stands today, and its coach, cannot really be judged for another 2-3 years. We may see some signs next year, but probably won't see the evolution of the Montana women's program under SS for another 2-3 years. Then we can discuss whether the bar set for Montana women's basketball is in need of being raised a few notches.
Oh, I forgot, this is Egriz where UM is always absolutely the tops in everything and no improvement is needed and all must think alike. No negativity on this board, for sure. All I read from the same tired people is either move up, the Big Sky sucks, we are in a death spiral, etc.....yes, I will look in again next year. But, I don't get the part where such highly "supportive" fans were not sitting behind the women's team in Reno cheering them on over all odds.maroonandsilver said:EverettGriz said:Look!!! lala is spewing negativity about a Griz BB program. Why, that's completely different....
NEXT YEAR! All those freshmen will be sophomores with lots of game experience. Valley and Sims will be back, and hopefully 100%. Two highly thought-of freshman (Stiles and Anderson) will be on the team. It will be the year of redemption and revenge!
....and lala might "tune in" during the BSC Tourney with no idea how the season has gone. And will then make comments on e-Griz, but only if he has something negative to spew.
GrizLA said:Oh, I forgot, this is Egriz where UM is always absolutely the tops in everything and no improvement is needed and all must think alike. No negativity on this board, for sure. All I read from the same tired people is either move up, the Big Sky sucks, we are in a death spiral, etc.....yes, I will look in again next year. But, I don't get the part where such highly "supportive" fans were not sitting behind the women's team in Reno cheering them on over all odds.maroonandsilver said:EverettGriz said:Look!!! lala is spewing negativity about a Griz BB program. Why, that's completely different....
NEXT YEAR! All those freshmen will be sophomores with lots of game experience. Valley and Sims will be back, and hopefully 100%. Two highly thought-of freshman (Stiles and Anderson) will be on the team. It will be the year of redemption and revenge!
....and lala might "tune in" during the BSC Tourney with no idea how the season has gone. And will then make comments on e-Griz, but only if he has something negative to spew.
EverettGriz said:GrizLA said:Oh, I forgot, this is Egriz where UM is always absolutely the tops in everything and no improvement is needed and all must think alike. No negativity on this board, for sure. All I read from the same tired people is either move up, the Big Sky sucks, we are in a death spiral, etc.....yes, I will look in again next year. But, I don't get the part where such highly "supportive" fans were not sitting behind the women's team in Reno cheering them on over all odds.maroonandsilver said:EverettGriz said:Look!!! lala is spewing negativity about a Griz BB program. Why, that's completely different....
NEXT YEAR! All those freshmen will be sophomores with lots of game experience. Valley and Sims will be back, and hopefully 100%. Two highly thought-of freshman (Stiles and Anderson) will be on the team. It will be the year of redemption and revenge!
....and lala might "tune in" during the BSC Tourney with no idea how the season has gone. And will then make comments on e-Griz, but only if he has something negative to spew.
LA, with all due respect, you cannot find one person posting in the BB section claim that LG team doesn't need improvement. Hell, plenty of weaknesses and areas of opportunity have been outlined in this very thread.
The point is that while we can be objective in a negative manner but also recognize upside, you seem to consistently struggle with the latter.
Fat Bruno said:Well, it's clear to me that without some inner city posters, this site will never be worth a damn.