• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Why not get the players together and...

G&B said:
Besides Jesus and football should never have anything to do with each other.

I thought I saw Jesus during a game in high school. Turned out to just be a concussion.... :) Followed the concussion protocol back then. Sat out a play....
 
I think it might be better for the Head Coach to have a series of meetings with his coaches and teach them the basics and objectives of teaching the players their responsibilities on field.
 
grizpack said:
G&B said:
Besides Jesus and football should never have anything to do with each other.

I thought I saw Jesus during a game in high school. Turned out to just be a concussion.... :) Followed the concussion protocol back then. Sat out a play....

That must have been one heck of a practice!
 
66volvo said:
Have a real come-to-Jesus talk about last year's season and subsequent melt-down? I mean, what would be the harm in convening a meeting to air gripes, concerns, suggestions and overall observations, especially from the graduating seniors on how to improve next season? This should be moderated by someone other than the HC and coaching staff. They should be included but there should be no reprisals and they should only be listeners. Let the players, who worked so hard together, offer their individual thoughts and collective ideas for a better outcome next year. Is this ever done?
As others on here have said, Yes. However, I believe that players, sans coaches, should have these sessions. Maybe already done. Every team needs its on-field, on-court, on-pool, etc., leader(s). These are the leaders that translate the coaches' teachings, strategies, etc., to the players, game to game, and provide the fire to other players, by backing up their own performance on the field, court, or pool.

A hypothesis, here: Leadership of any football program goes like this: players>players; players>coaching staff; coaching staff>AD; AD>admin; admin.>fans/public. Could be in reverse. Yet, if players are not executing on the field, the rest is BS.
 
rocklobster said:
kemajic said:
rocklobster said:
There were a lot of positives that came out of last year
That would be a good list to review.
Well there's...and there's...that time when...ok, other than that statement, everything's true.
I've seen your cheerleaders. They are easy on the eyes. That's a positive that you got to watch them at all the games.


Has anyone been a part of a bitch session? Because let's call it what it is. They suck. People feel ganged up on. Feelings get hurt. They don't accomplish what people think they do. In my opinion they make divisions worse.
 
66volvo said:
Have a real come-to-Jesus talk about last year's season and subsequent melt-down? I mean, what would be the harm in convening a meeting to air gripes, concerns, suggestions and overall observations, especially from the graduating seniors on how to improve next season? This should be moderated by someone other than the HC and coaching staff. They should be included but there should be no reprisals and they should only be listeners. Let the players, who worked so hard together, offer their individual thoughts and collective ideas for a better outcome next year. Is this ever done?


You dont know how college football works...do youuuu
 
As a wise Jimmy Johnson once said....

Its not about the Xs and the Os...but the Jimmy's and the Joe's...

truer words have never been spoken. And Stitt seems to be real good at getting the Jimmy's and the Joe's
 
I'm sure that has happened. Involving egriz is just not part of that process. And rightfully so.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
BadlandsGrizFan said:
As a wise Jimmy Johnson once said....

Its not about the Xs and the Os...but the Jimmy's and the Joe's...

truer words have never been spoken. And Stitt seems to be real good at getting the Jimmy's and the Joe's

Stitt might get a few Jimmy's, Joe's and Ju's, Don't need no bad Ju Ju's.
 
Back
Top